XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 ) 2003 - 2009

Taking the XJR to the dyno...Guess what I will run

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 1, 2009 | 08:49 PM
  #1  
budsang1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 300
Likes: 4
From: Chicago
Default Taking the XJR to the dyno...Guess what I will run

I'm taking my xjr to the dyno this saturday. I thought it would be fun to have a friendly competition and guess what I'll put down. Mods are in my signature. My guess...338whp and 394 ft lbs...I like to mix it up, lol

What's your guess?
 

Last edited by budsang1; Oct 1, 2009 at 10:21 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2009 | 10:11 PM
  #2  
cincinnati's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 371
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati
Default

GOOD DEAL ! make sure u get fresh gas before you go. im predicting 345hp and 410 lbs torque
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2009 | 10:20 PM
  #3  
budsang1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 300
Likes: 4
From: Chicago
Default

I hope so cinci...I better add my torque guess
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2009 | 11:15 PM
  #4  
patrickw813's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 360
Likes: 105
From: California
Default

Mustang dyno - 313rwhp, 327ft lbs
Dynojet - 328rwhp, 342ft lbs

When will you be taking your car there??
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2009 | 07:01 AM
  #5  
budsang1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 300
Likes: 4
From: Chicago
Default

Tomorrow!
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2009 | 09:34 AM
  #6  
SteveM's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 694
Likes: 100
From: NY
Default

Probably stock numbers, maybe 10hp more.
However, your 1/4 mile numbers say much less than stock, about 320 bhp.
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2009 | 10:08 AM
  #7  
Brutal's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,255
Likes: 2,209
From: Damon /Houston, Texas
Default

depends on what dyno you use, Dyno Dynamics, and Mustang dynos are always lower that Dyno Jet, But they are much more realistic to actual numbers. So what are you gonna dyno on, real world, or overly optimistic?
And then what are the correction factors used for altitude, humidity temps etc..
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2009 | 04:00 PM
  #8  
budsang1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 300
Likes: 4
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by SteveM
Probably stock numbers, maybe 10hp more.
However, your 1/4 mile numbers say much less than stock, about 320 bhp.
well, it was also my first time running a car at the track, and had a bit of wheel spin. That number will improve. I don't expect big gains from the mina exhaust and intake
 
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2009 | 04:40 PM
  #9  
patrickw813's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 360
Likes: 105
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by budsang1
Tomorrow!
Looking forward to hearing the results!
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 08:48 AM
  #10  
cincinnati's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 371
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati
Default

Well, today is the big day ! Im also curious what will be the airfuel ratio will be with the hp that will be made today.
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 05:49 PM
  #11  
budsang1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 300
Likes: 4
From: Chicago
Default

Results are in...

304whp & 310ft lbs
I was a bit disappointed. I did find out that the xjr suffers from heat soak like a mother...That seems to be a big problem right now. I will upload the graph soon
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 06:28 PM
  #12  
budsang1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 300
Likes: 4
From: Chicago
Default

 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 08:00 PM
  #13  
patrickw813's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 360
Likes: 105
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by budsang1
Results are in...

304whp & 310ft lbs
I was a bit disappointed. I did find out that the xjr suffers from heat soak like a mother...That seems to be a big problem right now. I will upload the graph soon
What were the ambient temperatures during this run? And do you know the elevation of the shop where these numbers were taken?

There can be a number of different factors that could result in a lower reading...

Assuming a 20% drivetrain loss from the automatic gearbox, you are sitting at exactly 380bhp to the crank and 387.5ft. lbs to the crank. These numbers are lower than stock which is why I think the weather and conditions may have had a huge influence on your numbers....
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 08:31 PM
  #14  
cincinnati's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 371
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati
Default

Wow ! I dont like the HUGE dip between 3200 rpm's and 3600 rpm's thats some missed hp. right there.
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 08:34 PM
  #15  
cincinnati's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 371
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati
Default

I wonder whats can be done to lessen the "engine heat soak" issue with these XJR's .
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 09:33 PM
  #16  
budsang1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 300
Likes: 4
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by cincinnati
Wow ! I dont like the HUGE dip between 3200 rpm's and 3600 rpm's thats some missed hp. right there.
I'm pretty sure that's just from him feathering the throttle. He said he was having trouble with it, too much throttle and it would downshift

I wonder whats can be done to lessen the "engine heat soak" issue with these XJR's .
a bigger better heat exchanger...I'm going to be looking into having one made

What were the ambient temperatures during this run? And do you know the elevation of the shop where these numbers were taken?
It was a chilly day, I would say ambient temps were only in the high 60's...elevation was around 600 ft above sea level
 

Last edited by budsang1; Oct 3, 2009 at 09:36 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 10:32 PM
  #17  
patrickw813's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 360
Likes: 105
From: California
Default

Well I took a closer look at the dyno chart and noticed that the dyno your car was run on is manufactured by Dyno Dynamics...which is widely known as the "Heartbreak Dyno".

The reason for this is that the Dyno Dynamics dyno reads significantly lower than a dynojet and even a mustang dyno.

Somebody correct me if I am wrong but the Dyno Dynamics dyno usually reads 10%-15% lower than a dynojet. If we take the average of these two, at 12.5%, your wheel horsepower on a dynojet may be around 342rwhp and 349ft. lbs.

These numbers sound about right for the modifications you have done to the car. That intake, when the hood is open, should give you a healthy gain...the exhaust may have helped as well.

My car, with just a 1.5lb upper pulley and oil that was run for 7500 miles made 340rwhp and 346ft. lbs on a dynojet.

Hopefully this makes you feel better about that 304rwhp reading!
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2009 | 10:45 PM
  #18  
budsang1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 300
Likes: 4
From: Chicago
Default

man-o-man, I hope you are right. That does make me feel alot better
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 12:12 AM
  #19  
cincinnati's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 371
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati
Default

whats a heat exchanger ? I never heard of this before .
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2009 | 03:40 PM
  #20  
patrickw813's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 360
Likes: 105
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by cincinnati
whats a heat exchanger ? I never heard of this before .
I think he was referring to the front mount intercooler.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 PM.