2016 base coupe building off racechip
#21
#22
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Does the race chip impact any of the ecu’s inherent safety features that might prevent engine issues? How safe is it?
ive always preferred software tunes that output actual values vs piggy backs that trick the Ecu with incorrect values, but with the way this car stores codes in the Ecu and all other modules, I don’t see any other options for tuning and maintaining warranty.
ive always preferred software tunes that output actual values vs piggy backs that trick the Ecu with incorrect values, but with the way this car stores codes in the Ecu and all other modules, I don’t see any other options for tuning and maintaining warranty.
#23
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Racechip isn't exactly a "tune" because the ECU continues to run the standard OEM ECU programing. That's why it's undetectable. The quality of health monitoring is inherent to the OEM software. Since any health monitoring scheme works by monitoring resulting conditions rather than analyzing control inputs, the OEM software should catch any dangerous result like it does all the time. The exception is the higher than known boost which puts the engine's overall build strength to the test like any tune.
And what the differences are for each these parameters between the 5-7 maps that come with the racechip unit?
i wasn’t able to find this info on the site.
#24
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks - is there any detailed information about what specific parameters are adjusted by the Racechip and to what degree for each map?
And what the differences are for each these parameters between the 5-7 maps that come with the racechip unit?
i wasn’t able to find this info on the site.
And what the differences are for each these parameters between the 5-7 maps that come with the racechip unit?
i wasn’t able to find this info on the site.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...lZ3HyNwOTQm8uf
There is a brief Jag blurb on their .us site from the 2014 days.
https://www.racechip.us/presse-news/...type-v8-s.html
It confirms exactly what I found with my V8 S, the base motor puts down more than 495 HP, 488 WHP to be exact or 508 WHP with a supercharger pulley. So the V8 S makes 555 HP at the flywheel from the factory, or 575 HP with a pulley. The numbers seem strangely coincidental with the R, so maybe they are truly the same car?
#25
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
https://www.youtube.com/user/RaceChipChiptuningyoutube
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...lZ3HyNwOTQm8uf
There is a brief Jag blurb on their .us site from the 2014 days.
https://www.racechip.us/presse-news/...type-v8-s.html
It confirms exactly what I found with my V8 S, the base motor puts down more than 495 HP, 488 WHP to be exact or 508 WHP with a supercharger pulley. So the V8 S makes 555 HP at the flywheel from the factory, or 575 HP with a pulley. The numbers seem strangely coincidental with the R, so maybe they are truly the same car?
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...lZ3HyNwOTQm8uf
There is a brief Jag blurb on their .us site from the 2014 days.
https://www.racechip.us/presse-news/...type-v8-s.html
It confirms exactly what I found with my V8 S, the base motor puts down more than 495 HP, 488 WHP to be exact or 508 WHP with a supercharger pulley. So the V8 S makes 555 HP at the flywheel from the factory, or 575 HP with a pulley. The numbers seem strangely coincidental with the R, so maybe they are truly the same car?
#26
#27
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
https://www.youtube.com/user/RaceChipChiptuningyoutube
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...lZ3HyNwOTQm8uf
There is a brief Jag blurb on their .us site from the 2014 days.
https://www.racechip.us/presse-news/...type-v8-s.html
It confirms exactly what I found with my V8 S, the base motor puts down more than 495 HP, 488 WHP to be exact or 508 WHP with a supercharger pulley. So the V8 S makes 555 HP at the flywheel from the factory, or 575 HP with a pulley. The numbers seem strangely coincidental with the R, so maybe they are truly the same car?
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...lZ3HyNwOTQm8uf
There is a brief Jag blurb on their .us site from the 2014 days.
https://www.racechip.us/presse-news/...type-v8-s.html
It confirms exactly what I found with my V8 S, the base motor puts down more than 495 HP, 488 WHP to be exact or 508 WHP with a supercharger pulley. So the V8 S makes 555 HP at the flywheel from the factory, or 575 HP with a pulley. The numbers seem strangely coincidental with the R, so maybe they are truly the same car?
Thanks for the links, I was looking for information around what engine / ecu paramaters are altered and how, for example:
-are fuel tables altered? Does the car utilize short / long term fuel trims and if so how are these adjusted in real time to account for increased boost?
-how is afr kept adjusted, what's the curve like under load?
-is timing advanced, how much?
-how is the intake air temp increase due to higher boost impacting everything (feuling, timing corrections, etc.)?
-Are knock tables or sensors adjusted in any way, if so how, and why?
-are there logs showing what the above paramaters and more look like under wot?
On the bmw platforms we have a great piggy back called jb4, and all the above details and more are fully transparent, you can take logs to check the health of your engine against the tune, and much more. It's hard for me to trust what this race chip is trying to accomplish without knowing more about what it being altered and to what extend and what is not being altered.
#28
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for the links, I was looking for information around what engine / ecu paramaters are altered and how, for example:
-are fuel tables altered? Does the car utilize short / long term fuel trims and if so how are these adjusted in real time to account for increased boost?
-how is afr kept adjusted, what's the curve like under load?
-is timing advanced, how much?
-how is the intake air temp increase due to higher boost impacting everything (feuling, timing corrections, etc.)?
-Are knock tables or sensors adjusted in any way, if so how, and why?
-are there logs showing what the above paramaters and more look like under wot?
On the bmw platforms we have a great piggy back called jb4, and all the above details and more are fully transparent, you can take logs to check the health of your engine against the tune, and much more. It's hard for me to trust what this race chip is trying to accomplish without knowing more about what it being altered and to what extend and what is not being altered.
-are fuel tables altered? Does the car utilize short / long term fuel trims and if so how are these adjusted in real time to account for increased boost?
-how is afr kept adjusted, what's the curve like under load?
-is timing advanced, how much?
-how is the intake air temp increase due to higher boost impacting everything (feuling, timing corrections, etc.)?
-Are knock tables or sensors adjusted in any way, if so how, and why?
-are there logs showing what the above paramaters and more look like under wot?
On the bmw platforms we have a great piggy back called jb4, and all the above details and more are fully transparent, you can take logs to check the health of your engine against the tune, and much more. It's hard for me to trust what this race chip is trying to accomplish without knowing more about what it being altered and to what extend and what is not being altered.
The only similarity to JB4 is it can be removed in a few minutes without a trace. The RC harness only has two intercepts instead of JB4's four. One sensor is easier than any of the JB4 locations, and one is harder the first time, but similar to JB4 once you figure it out.
Go RC if you want the possibility of preserving your warranty and you don't have any bolt-ons that will throw a code without a tune. You can combine high flow air filters and an upper pulley without issue. It's also about $200 cheaper.
Go VAP if you are out of warranty and/or want bolt-ons that require a tune.
Both seem to give comparable performance boosts to a stock car including an upper pulley. If you want a lower pulley you can't use RC.
Neither are going to give you anything in the ball park of a JB4 experience, with a hundred tunable parameters on the fly, seven programmable maps, pedal programming, gauge hijacking to repurpose the instrument cluster, a USB/BT interface with laptop performance logging and detailed firmware tweaking and a dashboard UI to use while driving.
Both RC and VAP cost more than a JB4 too, so be ready for that. Obviously the F-Type can't support a 100K tuners and those kinds of economies of scale. What the Jag does give you is a ferocious bitch lion of a car, before tuning.
Last edited by RacerX; 10-11-2019 at 07:22 PM.
#29
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Can someone go in to more detail on how to "rig" the exhaust valves open? Someone mentioned pulling a fuse. What am I looking for? (This would be on my 3.0 SC XF so I might not have the same options).
#31
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks, do you know what Fuse 43 is listed as controlling in the owners manual? Is it just "exhaust valve" or something similar? It might be a different number if it exists at all in my car.
ETA: I have three different fuses all listed as "Exhaust Sensors". Maybe just related to catalytic converter?
ETA: I have three different fuses all listed as "Exhaust Sensors". Maybe just related to catalytic converter?
Last edited by XFJoe; 10-11-2019 at 08:05 PM.
#32
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Or a playdough BMW charge pipe that cracks into 5 pieces and blows off the throttle body if you add 1 psi more boost. And a plastic boost solenoid that fails after a year. And a sensor connector so cheap it breaks in half. And plastic turbo intercooler piping that leaks in three places you can't fix without upgrading. Or a turbo plagued with oil control problems that coats your valves in caked carbon build-up if you don't add a catch can and methanol injection. Or a crap pressed tin and plastic FMIC that can't hold a seal when boosted and has to be replaced with a aftermarket all-aluminum quality part. Seriously.
Last edited by RacerX; 10-12-2019 at 02:03 AM.
#33
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Or a playdough BMW charge pipe that cracks into 5 pieces and blows off the throttle body if you add 1 psi more boost. And a plastic boost solenoid that fails after a year. And a sensor connector so cheap it breaks in half. And plastic turbo intercooler piping that leaks in three places you can't fix without upgrading. Or a turbo plagued with oil control problems that coats your valves in caked carbon build-up if you don't add a catch can and methanol injection. Or a crap pressed tin and plastic FMIC that can't hold a seal when boosted and has to be replaced with a aftermarket all-aluminum quality part. Seriously.
![Icon Laugh](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_laugh.gif)
![Icon Toast](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_toast.gif)
#34
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Icon Laugh](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_laugh.gif)
![Icon Toast](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_toast.gif)
Last edited by RacerX; 10-13-2019 at 12:53 AM.
#35
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Don’t bother with the upper pulley. The OEM upper pulley on the V6 is 62mm (as opposed to 66mm on the V8). The smallest pulley that will fit on the SC is 60.5, a mere 2.4% reduction in size on the V6. No, a RaceChip tune and an upper pulley will not throw any codes. A lower pulley provides enough added boost to require modified ecu mapping to prevent throwing a code. The RaceChip will not resolve that issue.
That would be a 4.11% with a 59.5mm pulley (the smallest one on the market for the F-Type)
#36
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
10 XF Premium
XF and XFR ( X250 )
4
07-27-2017 06:15 PM
Manofsteel
XF and XFR ( X250 )
13
06-18-2011 05:31 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)