Aluminum Cooling Pipes - Finally!!
#381
#382
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm about to pull the pin on having all the coolant pipes renewed (already got a coolant smell so likely a leak somewhere). Engine has done 70k on original pipes so it is overdue.
I asked my garage about fitting Al pipes (I bought some off RKX). They are reluctant, saying that there isn't the mileage on them yet to really know, and added they have not yet seen a failure of the updated pipes. I've heard of the plastic pipes (especially the 'Y') breaking up in the head. Was wondering whether ambient temps have an influence, (I guess in US there is a wider variation in temp, especially very cold). In the UK, with our wet and often miserable climate, the outside temps rarely get 'interesting'. So pondering what causes the break up of the newer pipes in the head, and wondering which route I should take (Al or updated plastic).
I asked my garage about fitting Al pipes (I bought some off RKX). They are reluctant, saying that there isn't the mileage on them yet to really know, and added they have not yet seen a failure of the updated pipes. I've heard of the plastic pipes (especially the 'Y') breaking up in the head. Was wondering whether ambient temps have an influence, (I guess in US there is a wider variation in temp, especially very cold). In the UK, with our wet and often miserable climate, the outside temps rarely get 'interesting'. So pondering what causes the break up of the newer pipes in the head, and wondering which route I should take (Al or updated plastic).
#383
The following users liked this post:
SouthSider (02-11-2024)
#384
#385
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm about to pull the pin on having all the coolant pipes renewed (already got a coolant smell so likely a leak somewhere). Engine has done 70k on original pipes so it is overdue.
I asked my garage about fitting Al pipes (I bought some off RKX). They are reluctant, saying that there isn't the mileage on them yet to really know, and added they have not yet seen a failure of the updated pipes. I've heard of the plastic pipes (especially the 'Y') breaking up in the head. Was wondering whether ambient temps have an influence, (I guess in US there is a wider variation in temp, especially very cold). In the UK, with our wet and often miserable climate, the outside temps rarely get 'interesting'. So pondering what causes the break up of the newer pipes in the head, and wondering which route I should take (Al or updated plastic).
I asked my garage about fitting Al pipes (I bought some off RKX). They are reluctant, saying that there isn't the mileage on them yet to really know, and added they have not yet seen a failure of the updated pipes. I've heard of the plastic pipes (especially the 'Y') breaking up in the head. Was wondering whether ambient temps have an influence, (I guess in US there is a wider variation in temp, especially very cold). In the UK, with our wet and often miserable climate, the outside temps rarely get 'interesting'. So pondering what causes the break up of the newer pipes in the head, and wondering which route I should take (Al or updated plastic).
One thing to consider is that if you have the new Jag pipes installed by a dealership and they crumble prematurely, they should be covered under warranty. An indy is not going to cover you if an ali part you bought online fails, and there aren't a whole lot of documented cases where people have had good or bad warranty service from Euroamp/RKX/etc.
This also is NOT a Jaguar-specific issue - the cooling system on my diesel VW Caddy just sh*t the bed and as soon as we replaced one plastic part, another blew. In its defense though, it has 250,000km on it...
Last edited by dangoesfast; 02-11-2024 at 04:29 PM.
The following users liked this post:
cbarr (02-12-2024)
#386
#387
#388
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
There's nothing wrong with the alloy pipes, in fact the first version of the JLR pipes WERE alloy before they switched to plastic. The plastic pipes WILL fail, including other plastics in the circuit. I know this from my own experience as well as numerous reports here and else where for many models. It's not if, it's when. The leaking O-rings are likely due to poor grade rubber and I'm kicking myself for not working harder at finding a replacement before I installed them the first time around, so here I am with all 3 failed. The grade and quality of the O-rings is very important so make certain you've got nitrile or viton and not plain rubber.
#389
#390
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Buying the part from an overseas seller and having your indy install it makes the waters a bit muddier and it'd be all but impossible for your local consumer protection organisation to take any action if something went wrong.
#391
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well what's weird is Jaguar started with Aluminum cooling pipes when the 5.0L was first introduced. Then a year or two later they swapped to plastic.
Don't know why but suspect cost savings. Aluminum is much superior to plastic in this application and if you look at many cars you will see the Aluminum stuff holds up and the plastic stuff does not.
I will be replacing ANY plastic with Aluminum if I can find the parts. Tired of failed plastic.
.
.
.
Don't know why but suspect cost savings. Aluminum is much superior to plastic in this application and if you look at many cars you will see the Aluminum stuff holds up and the plastic stuff does not.
I will be replacing ANY plastic with Aluminum if I can find the parts. Tired of failed plastic.
.
.
.
#392
#393
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You would get laughed out of a dealership here unless 1. You are a repeat good customer and they were feeling benevolent, or 2. You found a dealer in a rare but good mood to provide customer satisfaction that might give them business in the future.
#394
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Anyways it's simply one thing to consider before making a decision, if you're too afraid of what a dealer might think of you to use the law then the decision's made for you.
Last edited by dangoesfast; 02-12-2024 at 01:49 PM.
#395
#396
#397
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have an interest in law and a background in legislation, and I also find it hard to believe that California doesn't have some sort of similar protection for consumers, so I did a 2 minute google and found this: https://casetext.com/statute/califor...usage-of-trade
Note I have no idea how the law works in the US, so I can only go off what I read and this is only one tiny piece of legislation.
Based on that, I would argue that an engine part lasting one year and one month, apart from wear items which are allowed for above as "exclusions," is not "fit for purpose." Looking at this piece of legislation, it seems you would have a reasonable case to claim that Jag cannot limit their warranty to one year in this case.
One of the biggest problems that consumer law organizations have is that consumers take the word of companies when they tell them what their warranty rights are. Almost all developed countries have legal protections in place for consumers for exactly this sort of thing, and it seems California is no exception. Jag's limited warranty might last 12 months, but it seems the law might be on your side for a while longer.
That being said, definitely don't take legal advice from a guy 10,000 kilometers away talking s*** on an Internet forum 😂
Goods to be merchantable must be at least such as:
(a) Pass without objection in the trade under the contract description; and
(b) In the case of fungible goods, are of fair average quality within the description; and
(c) Are fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used; and
(d) Run, within the variations permitted by the agreement, of even kind, quality and quantity within each unit and among all units involved; and
(e) Are adequately contained, packaged, and labeled as the agreement may require; and
(f) Conform to the promises or affirmations of fact made on the container or label if any.
(a) Pass without objection in the trade under the contract description; and
(b) In the case of fungible goods, are of fair average quality within the description; and
(c) Are fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used; and
(d) Run, within the variations permitted by the agreement, of even kind, quality and quantity within each unit and among all units involved; and
(e) Are adequately contained, packaged, and labeled as the agreement may require; and
(f) Conform to the promises or affirmations of fact made on the container or label if any.
Based on that, I would argue that an engine part lasting one year and one month, apart from wear items which are allowed for above as "exclusions," is not "fit for purpose." Looking at this piece of legislation, it seems you would have a reasonable case to claim that Jag cannot limit their warranty to one year in this case.
One of the biggest problems that consumer law organizations have is that consumers take the word of companies when they tell them what their warranty rights are. Almost all developed countries have legal protections in place for consumers for exactly this sort of thing, and it seems California is no exception. Jag's limited warranty might last 12 months, but it seems the law might be on your side for a while longer.
That being said, definitely don't take legal advice from a guy 10,000 kilometers away talking s*** on an Internet forum 😂
Last edited by dangoesfast; 02-12-2024 at 02:33 PM.
#399
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think there are already a couple of posts in this thread with prices, if not there's a second thread on this topic in the XJ forum