F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Differences between 2015 and 2017/18

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-26-2017, 12:31 PM
dcvickers's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: WI
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Differences between 2015 and 2017/18

I picked up a firesand 2015 R a couple of years ago, but got rid of it and have regretted it since. So, now I'm looking to get back into an F-Type and I'm trying to figure out what the significant differences are between 2015 and 2017/18 aside from the 2015 being RWD. The reason I ask is because I really don't like the body-colored side skirts and rear diffuser, but if there are some improvements (better speakers maybe?) then I may have to look into getting a new one.

Can anyone help me out here?
 
The following users liked this post:
Suaro (09-26-2017)
  #2  
Old 09-26-2017, 01:21 PM
DJS's Avatar
DJS
DJS is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Metrowest Boston
Posts: 6,286
Received 2,106 Likes on 1,406 Posts
Default

Pretty major styling differences for the '18.
New entertainment system.
Different color options.
 
  #3  
Old 09-26-2017, 01:21 PM
xoai's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 73
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

As far as larger changes goes.. I believe just different front air intake design & new infotainment
 
  #4  
Old 09-26-2017, 02:45 PM
dcvickers's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: WI
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DJS
Pretty major styling differences for the '18.
New entertainment system.
Different color options.
Didn't know about the different styling. After looking into this it looks like they made the body-colored side skirts optional for 2018! Too bad the dealers seem to be ordering them with the body-colored option, though . Looks like firesand is also no longer a color option. Ugh.

Are the speakers any better than they used to be? They were pretty awful in the 2015.
 
  #5  
Old 09-26-2017, 03:19 PM
DJS's Avatar
DJS
DJS is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Metrowest Boston
Posts: 6,286
Received 2,106 Likes on 1,406 Posts
Default

There were some software issues in the digital amp which could result in terrible audio. Some folks got that straightened out, some didn't.

Biggest styling difference is the front bumper - look at the vents on the sides in the various '18 models.

Also, for AWD cars, the hood vents moved out some.

Not sure if '15 cars had any torque-vectoring capability - think that came later.
 
  #6  
Old 09-27-2017, 12:16 AM
Arne's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 1,100
Received 338 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DJS
There were some software issues in the digital amp which could result in terrible audio. Some folks got that straightened out, some didn't.

Biggest styling difference is the front bumper - look at the vents on the sides in the various '18 models.

Also, for AWD cars, the hood vents moved out some.

Not sure if '15 cars had any torque-vectoring capability - think that came later.
'15 cars does have the same torque-vectoring capability.
 
  #7  
Old 09-27-2017, 12:32 AM
Chawumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: So Cal
Posts: 800
Received 241 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Not to beat a dead horse or reignite a frequently fought battle on the forum, but considering that the 2014-2015 (aka the classic years with RWD) cars 1) weigh about 180 lbs less, and 2) the hood is about 1.5 inches lower (they had to raise the engine and hence the hoodline to graph in the AWD), and to my mind its a no brainer - get the 2015.
 
The following 4 users liked this post by Chawumba:
15FTypeR (11-01-2017), Don1954 (11-01-2017), Jagged Wire (11-05-2017), sts-v (11-02-2017)
  #8  
Old 09-27-2017, 07:51 AM
dcvickers's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: WI
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chawumba
Not to beat a dead horse or reignite a frequently fought battle on the forum, but considering that the 2014-2015 (aka the classic years with RWD) cars 1) weigh about 180 lbs less, and 2) the hood is about 1.5 inches lower (they had to raise the engine and hence the hoodline to graph in the AWD), and to my mind its a no brainer - get the 2015.
I'm leaning that way because I was more than happy with my 2015. Hard to find one with the specs/color I want and not a ton of miles, though.

I've been reading about removing the ridiculous side skirts on the 2016+ and that seems to be a viable route, but I'm not sure exactly how hard it would be. Also, does anyone know if you can pick up a 2015 diffuser to replace the painted 2016+? Is it an exact fit?
 
  #9  
Old 09-27-2017, 09:02 AM
xoai's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 73
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Oh, also.. Hydraulic steering went away in 2016+
 
  #10  
Old 09-27-2017, 10:27 AM
DJS's Avatar
DJS
DJS is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Metrowest Boston
Posts: 6,286
Received 2,106 Likes on 1,406 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Arne
'15 cars does have the same torque-vectoring capability.
Arne, don't forget your model year is different than the US MY. I think...
 
  #11  
Old 09-27-2017, 11:08 AM
355rockit's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: San Marcos, CA
Posts: 304
Received 104 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DJS
Arne, don't forget your model year is different than the US MY. I think...
+1 on Torque vectoring on 2015 R.
 
  #12  
Old 09-27-2017, 01:19 PM
Arne's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 1,100
Received 338 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DJS
Arne, don't forget your model year is different than the US MY. I think...
Mine is a MY 2015 made in 2014 - first production year for the coupe 😉
 
  #13  
Old 09-27-2017, 03:39 PM
FR500GT's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 737
Received 153 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dcvickers
I've been reading about removing the ridiculous side skirts on the 2016+ and that seems to be a viable route, but I'm not sure exactly how hard it would be...
I'll gladly take those off your hands and pay for shipping
 
  #14  
Old 11-01-2017, 01:54 PM
Burt Gummer's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 2,090
Received 343 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

I am biased, but it is all downhill for looks post 2015. 2018 with the Kia slits, barf. Infotainment is never used; that is what a mobile phone is for, Spofity/Waze.
Outside of looks the 2015R has RWD and drama and that is what an F-type is all about.

 

Last edited by Burt Gummer; 11-01-2017 at 02:02 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Don1954 (11-01-2017)
  #15  
Old 11-01-2017, 01:57 PM
Don1954's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 475
Received 40 Likes on 29 Posts
Default Better Speakers?

You would by one if it had better speakers?
 
  #16  
Old 11-01-2017, 02:07 PM
Burt Gummer's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 2,090
Received 343 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

No I have tinnitus so I can never crank the stereo + I prefer the exhaust noise.

I can afford a new F-type SVR or other, but I truly like the 2015 the best. Having no life parasites (wife or kids) opens the door to just about any life toys a man wants.

Leno: "Money or material things won't make an unhappy person happy, but it will make a happy person happier.'
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Burt Gummer:
15FTypeR (11-01-2017), sts-v (11-02-2017)
  #17  
Old 11-01-2017, 02:17 PM
15FTypeR's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 480
Received 129 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Burt Gummer
Having no life parasites (wife or kids) opens the door to just about any life toys a man wants.
A - f***ing - men

Originally Posted by Chawumba
2014-2015 ... hood is about 1.5 inches lower
Really? I did not know this. Not doubting you, but where is this info?

.
 

Last edited by 15FTypeR; 11-01-2017 at 02:30 PM.
  #18  
Old 11-01-2017, 02:50 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,661 Likes on 3,366 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 15FTypeR
A - f***ing - men


Really? I did not know this. Not doubting you, but where is this info?

.
All the AWDs are that much higher than the RWDs. You have to fit that extra diff. somewhere.
 
  #19  
Old 11-01-2017, 03:17 PM
DJS's Avatar
DJS
DJS is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Metrowest Boston
Posts: 6,286
Received 2,106 Likes on 1,406 Posts
Default

In 2014, the V8S was spec'd at 0.4" taller (51.9") than the V6 (51.5"). This is overall height (roof up), not hood height. (From the Driver's Handbook.)
 
  #20  
Old 11-01-2017, 09:31 PM
Nati's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,400
Received 371 Likes on 257 Posts
Default

I didn't even realize they mucked with the front splitter too. Gah. I wanted to get an R next but the front bumper is really bad. No choice but to go SVR now.
 
The following users liked this post:
Burt Gummer (11-01-2017)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 PM.