F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Does this seem like the F-Type is being devalued? (diesel 4)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 11-09-2016 | 05:51 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,939
Likes: 4,664
From: Maryland, US
Default

Cambo,
I was just clowning around with my previous post, but then decided to look into it. Not such a stupid idea:
"Introducing the R10 (Audi)


The 2005 season would be the R8's last full competition docket, supplanted by the car that stood endurance racing on its ear. The new Audi prototype was the R10, a V12, twin-turbocharged, direct-injected diesel. For the 2005 and 2006 seasons, the 5.5-liter engine produced 650 hp and 737 lb-ft of torque.
The results were almost immediate, proving that diesels could win at Le Mans. Audi pilot Rinaldo Capello put an R10 on the 2006 Le Mans pole with a 3:31.211 lap at 144.57 mph. While lap speeds for the diesels weren't considerably faster than those of the gasoline-powered cars they replaced, the diesels could go longer between fuel stops.
The R10 went on to win the 24 Hours of Le Mans in 2006, 2007 and 2008."


Diesels From Audi and Peugeot at Le Mans - Why Audi and Peugeot Diesels Rule the Le Mans Raceway


Needless to say, though, a V-12 is a far cry from an I-4.
 
  #22  
Old 11-09-2016 | 06:06 PM
Cambo's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 8,638
Likes: 4,467
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Sure there are many fantastic diesel engines out there. Like the 4.4L TDV8 in the Range Rovers, or even the older 3.6L version. The current 3.0L V6's are pretty good too.

But a 2.0L four is a different story... It's fine for the little SUV's and sedans that have no pretence of being "sporty", but in an F-Type, just no...
 
  #23  
Old 11-09-2016 | 06:07 PM
Tel's Avatar
Tel
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 876
Likes: 233
From: South Coast - UK
Thumbs down Diesel F-Type

I just don't think that the sound/growl, or lack of, will suit the car at all, irrespective of whether it is an Oil burner or a Petrol.

Strap two, four cylinder engines together, then the sound will match the image!

Does any Petrolhead sit and watch Formula E and get excited????

Just wrong.
 

Last edited by Tel; 11-09-2016 at 06:18 PM.
  #24  
Old 11-09-2016 | 06:23 PM
Dogbreath!'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 643
Likes: 176
From: People's Republik of MD
Default

[QUOTE=Cambo;1566318]Is everyone missing the DIESEL aspect here?

Do Americans know what DIESEL is? Maybe not since you don't have diesel cars in North America, only trucks.

Au contraire mon ami. VW has done pretty well with diesels here (OK so they pollute a bit more than they should). My daughter has a Jetta TDI and it is a damn fine car. You can count on 40+mpg on the highway with a hefty amount of torque.
 
  #25  
Old 11-09-2016 | 07:19 PM
plums's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 9,733
Likes: 2,185
From: on-the-edge
Default

Except that VW is faced with a buy back due to the engineering clowns.

Hope they resell them to cut their losses. A good chance to pick one
up at a decent price.
 
The following users liked this post:
SinF (11-10-2016)
  #26  
Old 11-09-2016 | 07:22 PM
BruceTheQuail's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,985
Likes: 1,311
From: Gold Coast, Oz
Default

The 3.0TTD would be a sweet engine for a bigger GT like the XK. But it doesnt sound like a diesel. I dont know that it would be any good for the f type because the off the line response isnt so good and the extra weight could knock around the handling.

The Jag 4 pot diesels sound very agricultural. The kind of thing where you hear very prominent clatter if you are idling next to a solid wall. I suspect that if they were to sell the f type as a diesel, it would be for the UK market which I believe is more "why on earth would you buy petrol when you can have diesel?" rather than vice versa.

Personally I'd rather electric with no sound than a car with diesel sound. And I'm a nut for engine noise.
 
  #27  
Old 11-10-2016 | 04:32 AM
Fraser Mitchell's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 2,467
From: Crewe, England
Default

The plain fact is that a lot of markets require cars with low fuel consumption. In the US you have the Corporate Average Fuel Consumption test, so producing a powerful diesel drops this down. Also there are a lot of people who only want to swan around in the car, and don't want to dump rubber every time they go out.
 
  #28  
Old 11-10-2016 | 06:56 AM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,939
Likes: 4,664
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by Fraser Mitchell
The plain fact is that a lot of markets require cars with low fuel consumption. In the US you have the Corporate Average Fuel Consumption test, so producing a powerful diesel drops this down. Also there are a lot of people who only want to swan around in the car, and don't want to dump rubber every time they go out.
But it's a Jaaaag, not a floating bird. lol
 
  #29  
Old 11-21-2016 | 02:38 PM
Burt Gummer's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 354
From: Portland OR
Default

I'll stick to a Diesel in my work van not my sports car.

If Jag is going the route of diesels or I4s for the F-type it is a good thing for the current crop of owners resale wise.

I wonder how long the big V8 Jags, Hellcats, Vets, etc can go on without gov eventually doing a 1970 and ruining all the fun. Screw the 60s muscle car era, the real one started around 2014 (and that is coming from an AARP).
 
  #30  
Old 11-24-2016 | 02:38 AM
AnD3rew's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 952
Likes: 173
From: Sydney Australia
Default

Love Diesels, great engines, great torque, great economy. Wouldn't buy a petrol 4X4 or truck. Small turbo Diesels are great in small urban runabout cars.

It a 2cyl 2lt Diesel does not belong in any sports car and it definitely doesn't belong in an f type.
 
  #31  
Old 11-27-2016 | 08:11 AM
CW3SF's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 62
Likes: 21
From: Franklin, TN
Default

Originally Posted by AnD3rew
Love Diesels, great engines, great torque, great economy. Wouldn't buy a petrol 4X4 or truck. Small turbo Diesels are great in small urban runabout cars.

It a 2cyl 2lt Diesel does not belong in any sports car and it definitely doesn't belong in an f type.
I have the 3.0L TDI engine in my Audi Q7. It doesn't have what most people think of as "that diesel sound". If you didn't see the TDI badge on it, most people wouldn't even know it's a diesel by the sound. Fuel economy is superb and it has excellent torque. I regularly pull a trailer with 2 Harley's and it pulls them effortlessly. It's an incredible machine.

Having said that, it's great in my SUV but I wouldn't want it in my sports car. It just doesn't belong there, IMHO. It doesn't have the same "feel" as a gas engine.
 

Last edited by CW3SF; 11-27-2016 at 08:20 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cambo
Jaguar Engines & transmissions
107
08-15-2023 07:30 PM
Don B
General Tech Help
10
11-09-2015 12:59 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Does this seem like the F-Type is being devalued? (diesel 4)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 AM.