F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dyno numbers on DynaPack

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-30-2018, 01:37 PM
sgvkirbster's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles (SGV)
Posts: 220
Received 52 Likes on 33 Posts
Default Dyno numbers on DynaPack

So as a lot of u know, I’ve had my ‘16 f-type r dynoed on a Dyno Dynamics. I try not to get too caught up in numbers since dynoes are a tuning tool more than anything else. However, needless to say, I just wasn’t impressed with those numbers. I guess they don’t call Dynamics the “heartbreaker” dyno for nothing. Hahaha. Anyway, I did another dyno run, this time on a DynaPack at Road Race Engineering in Santa Fe Springs, California. So on this dyno, which reads high like a DynoJet, my R put down 523 whp/512 ft lbs tq. Factoring in the 20% drivetrain loss, that puts me at 655 hp/640 ft lbs tq!! Pretty impressive. Now I do have to say, there is one difference between now and when I dynoed on a DynoDynamics. I took out the 200 cell catalysts and replaced them with a cat-delete straight-pipe. Not sure if that translates to any actual gains. But I can tell u this, my “butt-dyno” tells me there’s a significant difference, particularly in the higher rpm range. Again, not sure if numbers-wise there is any significant difference. Just sharing my personal experience. The drawback? The car sounds like **** now. Like really really bad. Sounds cheap. On top of that, if u live out in California like me, it’s an ultra expensive ticket if you’re caught running a straight pipe on the street. So if u can’t afford the ticket, I definitely wouldn’t recommend it. And that sound? Absolutely horrendous. I’m gonna take it to Fontana Speedway next month for some 1/4 mile time slips. After that, I’m putting the 200 cell cats back on.
 

Last edited by sgvkirbster; 01-30-2018 at 01:40 PM.
  #2  
Old 01-30-2018, 01:39 PM
ndabunka's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 1,260
Received 157 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Info missing here. What were your Dyno Dynamics numbers from that first run?

Disregard. Found the original post here in post #26.
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...-188729/page2/
 

Last edited by ndabunka; 01-30-2018 at 01:45 PM.
  #3  
Old 01-30-2018, 01:44 PM
sgvkirbster's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles (SGV)
Posts: 220
Received 52 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ndabunka
Info missing here. What were your Dyno Dynamics numbers from that first run?
I can’t seem to find the chart. But it was 452 whp. Don’t remember what the torque was.
 
  #4  
Old 01-30-2018, 01:54 PM
sgvkirbster's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles (SGV)
Posts: 220
Received 52 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ndabunka
Info missing here. What were your Dyno Dynamics numbers from that first run?

Disregard. Found the original post here in post #26.
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...-188729/page2/
There was another run after that post. With all my current mods listed in my signature. 452 whp. Which in theory is about right since DynoDynamics read about 12-16% lower than DynoJet or DynaPack.
 
  #5  
Old 01-30-2018, 02:49 PM
ndabunka's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 1,260
Received 157 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sgvkirbster
There was another run after that post. With all my current mods listed in my signature. 452 whp. Which in theory is about right since DynoDynamics read about 12-16% lower than DynoJet or DynaPack.
I guess my real question is... did you get a tune that was able to accommodate the additional airflow? If so, was the result the same 7-10HP?
 

Last edited by ndabunka; 01-30-2018 at 03:10 PM.
  #6  
Old 01-30-2018, 02:59 PM
sgvkirbster's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles (SGV)
Posts: 220
Received 52 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ndabunka
I guess my real question is... did you get a tune that was able to accommodate the additional airflow? If so, was the result the same 7-10HP?

Additional questions/thoughts: The smoothing factor and the type of measurement are both important on Dynos.
The VAP tune accommodates both 200 cell and straight pipe setups.
 

Last edited by sgvkirbster; 01-30-2018 at 06:47 PM.
  #7  
Old 01-30-2018, 04:01 PM
ndabunka's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 1,260
Received 157 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sgvkirbster
The VAP tune accommodates both 200 call and straight pipe setups.
OK, but my question wasn't related to either of those exhaust components. It was related to the new intake you put on that was advertised to provide as much as 30HP. I thought 7-10 was more likely and that was confirmed when you tested with the other dyno prior to the tune. Others on that thread thought that perhaps you weren't getting more as you had not added the tune at that time. However, separating that component out might not be simple so you may not be able to tell without removing and re-testing (now that you have the tune) but few would have any real justification to do unless they were the mfg of the intake.
 

Last edited by ndabunka; 01-30-2018 at 04:04 PM.
  #8  
Old 01-30-2018, 06:36 PM
sgvkirbster's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles (SGV)
Posts: 220
Received 52 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ndabunka
OK, but my question wasn't related to either of those exhaust components. It was related to the new intake you put on that was advertised to provide as much as 30HP. I thought 7-10 was more likely and that was confirmed when you tested with the other dyno prior to the tune. Others on that thread thought that perhaps you weren't getting more as you had not added the tune at that time. However, separating that component out might not be simple so you may not be able to tell without removing and re-testing (now that you have the tune) but few would have any real justification to do unless they were the mfg of the intake.
Looks like u answered your own question. Hahaha. To clarify, the Eventuri Intake was the 1st performance mod I did on my R. There’s no way at this point that I would be able to test that alone. Nowadays, very few cars if any, are that restrictive on the intake end. A 7-10 hp gain is about all u can expect.
 
  #9  
Old 01-30-2018, 06:56 PM
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,682
Received 852 Likes on 479 Posts
Default

That sounds pretty normal for Dynapack. Since they bolt right to the hub they are spinning less mass.

We did a lot of work with a Dynapack setup when we were working on Lance's crank pulley tune, long before anyone else had come out with this. Such a pleasure to work with because it rules out tire pressure, strap tightness and all kinds of other inconsistencies. The runs are so consistent and repeatable.
 
__________________
Stuart Dickinson
Managing Director
VelocityAP Industries Ltd.
O: (1)250-485-5126
E: Stuart@VelocityAP.com
www.velocityap.com

The following users liked this post:
sgvkirbster (01-30-2018)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SpartanX
X-Type ( X400 )
4
09-21-2020 09:50 AM
Darren9090
XF and XFR ( X250 )
40
01-04-2017 11:29 AM
Guille
XK / XKR ( X150 )
0
02-13-2016 06:02 PM
SteveM
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
13
06-11-2014 11:27 PM
Under Pressure
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
31
02-26-2013 07:04 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Dyno numbers on DynaPack



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 PM.