F-type R Carbon/Ceramic brakes.
#1
F-type R Carbon/Ceramic brakes.
I want to get some input on the F-type Carbon/Ceramic brakes. I want to order with them, but I've never drove a car with them. Only what I've read and that can be conflicting from different articles. Some say they don't feel right until they are hot, some say otherwise. One review says they speak, another says they don't sqeak.
My 03 STR, are brembo stock steel obviously but sqeak like a mother when they heat up ever since it was new, and the brake dust is incredible. They go from spotless to dusty in just a short drive.
I think the C/C brakes make the F-type. I'm just hoping for good news when it comes to sqeaking, dust and brake feel.
Thanks in advance for any input.
My 03 STR, are brembo stock steel obviously but sqeak like a mother when they heat up ever since it was new, and the brake dust is incredible. They go from spotless to dusty in just a short drive.
I think the C/C brakes make the F-type. I'm just hoping for good news when it comes to sqeaking, dust and brake feel.
Thanks in advance for any input.
The following users liked this post:
George Smith (06-15-2021)
#2
I want to get some input on the F-type Carbon/Ceramic brakes. I want to order with them, but I've never drove a car with them. Only what I've read and that can be conflicting from different articles. Some say they don't feel right until they are hot, some say otherwise. One review says they speak, another says they don't sqeak.
My 03 STR, are brembo stock steel obviously but sqeak like a mother when they heat up ever since it was new, and the brake dust is incredible. They go from spotless to dusty in just a short drive.
I think the C/C brakes make the F-type. I'm just hoping for good news when it comes to sqeaking, dust and brake feel.
Thanks in advance for any input.
My 03 STR, are brembo stock steel obviously but sqeak like a mother when they heat up ever since it was new, and the brake dust is incredible. They go from spotless to dusty in just a short drive.
I think the C/C brakes make the F-type. I'm just hoping for good news when it comes to sqeaking, dust and brake feel.
Thanks in advance for any input.
You're about to get bombarded by a lot of members here who DON'T have CCB's, justifying their choice for not getting them.
You will inevitably be pointed to this thread where the discussion has been played out in detail, so I'll get in first...
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...brakes-135628/
I have CCB's so my firsthand experience is that they are really effective (saved me twice today), develop a tiny bit of squeal if only used lightly all the time, but a serious stop will get rid of that pretty quickly. They look fantastic, and I have had two instances where people pulled up at the lights next to me and specifically photographed the brakes.
They are very expensive, no doubt, and that is a significant enough reason advanced by many people for not buying them.
It is claimed in the thread above that Evo's test of them vs iron proves they're not worth it. There is a discussion of the flawed methodology in that test too, so you can draw your own conclusion.
If you are planning to track your car, then they are definitely a good idea.
I have not regretted my choice for even one second.
Cheers,
Oz
The following users liked this post:
Panthro (10-21-2016)
#3
#5
Even though I am unlikely to track the car, and despite all the reasons to the contrary that were expressed in the other thread, I would certainly opt for the CCBs. However, they are unfortunately not offered with the 6 speed. My reasons would include in order of importance: 1) substantial un-sprung weight reduction,2) significantly reduced dust, and 3) reduced maintenance costs over the next 2 or 3 decades.
The following users liked this post:
Panthro (10-21-2016)
#6
Hi SoCalJagS,
You're about to get bombarded by a lot of members here who DON'T have CCB's, justifying their choice for not getting them.
You will inevitably be pointed to this thread where the discussion has been played out in detail, so I'll get in first...
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...brakes-135628/
I have CCB's so my firsthand experience is that they are really effective (saved me twice today), develop a tiny bit of squeal if only used lightly all the time, but a serious stop will get rid of that pretty quickly. They look fantastic, and I have had two instances where people pulled up at the lights next to me and specifically photographed the brakes.
They are very expensive, no doubt, and that is a significant enough reason advanced by many people for not buying them.
It is claimed in the thread above that Evo's test of them vs iron proves they're not worth it. There is a discussion of the flawed methodology in that test too, so you can draw your own conclusion.
If you are planning to track your car, then they are definitely a good idea.
I have not regretted my choice for even one second.
Cheers,
Oz
You're about to get bombarded by a lot of members here who DON'T have CCB's, justifying their choice for not getting them.
You will inevitably be pointed to this thread where the discussion has been played out in detail, so I'll get in first...
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...brakes-135628/
I have CCB's so my firsthand experience is that they are really effective (saved me twice today), develop a tiny bit of squeal if only used lightly all the time, but a serious stop will get rid of that pretty quickly. They look fantastic, and I have had two instances where people pulled up at the lights next to me and specifically photographed the brakes.
They are very expensive, no doubt, and that is a significant enough reason advanced by many people for not buying them.
It is claimed in the thread above that Evo's test of them vs iron proves they're not worth it. There is a discussion of the flawed methodology in that test too, so you can draw your own conclusion.
If you are planning to track your car, then they are definitely a good idea.
I have not regretted my choice for even one second.
Cheers,
Oz
#9
Hi SoCalJagS,
You're about to get bombarded by a lot of members here who DON'T have CCB's, justifying their choice for not getting them.
You will inevitably be pointed to this thread where the discussion has been played out in detail, so I'll get in first...
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...brakes-135628/
I have CCB's so my firsthand experience is that they are really effective (saved me twice today), develop a tiny bit of squeal if only used lightly all the time, but a serious stop will get rid of that pretty quickly. They look fantastic, and I have had two instances where people pulled up at the lights next to me and specifically photographed the brakes.
They are very expensive, no doubt, and that is a significant enough reason advanced by many people for not buying them.
It is claimed in the thread above that Evo's test of them vs iron proves they're not worth it. There is a discussion of the flawed methodology in that test too, so you can draw your own conclusion.
If you are planning to track your car, then they are definitely a good idea.
I have not regretted my choice for even one second.
Cheers,
Oz
You're about to get bombarded by a lot of members here who DON'T have CCB's, justifying their choice for not getting them.
You will inevitably be pointed to this thread where the discussion has been played out in detail, so I'll get in first...
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...brakes-135628/
I have CCB's so my firsthand experience is that they are really effective (saved me twice today), develop a tiny bit of squeal if only used lightly all the time, but a serious stop will get rid of that pretty quickly. They look fantastic, and I have had two instances where people pulled up at the lights next to me and specifically photographed the brakes.
They are very expensive, no doubt, and that is a significant enough reason advanced by many people for not buying them.
It is claimed in the thread above that Evo's test of them vs iron proves they're not worth it. There is a discussion of the flawed methodology in that test too, so you can draw your own conclusion.
If you are planning to track your car, then they are definitely a good idea.
I have not regretted my choice for even one second.
Cheers,
Oz
So:
No brake dust;
Never having to replace the pads/disks (unless you keep it for a really long time...);
Bragging rights.
If you track it, you may also benefit from reduced unsprung weight and rotational inertia (the latter can be felt on the road too with some models).
Additionally if you are the Last of the Late Brakers, you may notice that the brakes are completely consistent no matter how long you stay on track.
Fundamentally, if you like the look of them (plus the wheels that come with them), and you can afford them, why not?
There may be other Options and Accesories that you prefer for the money however.
Have fun.
#10
Oz may however be considered to be suffering from some "Confirmation Bias" in his assertion that the methodology was flawed. I miss-quoted the article, but that's not the same as flaws in the methodology of the test itself.
So:
No brake dust;
Never having to replace the pads/disks (unless you keep it for a really long time...);
Bragging rights.
If you track it, you may also benefit from reduced unsprung weight and rotational inertia (the latter can be felt on the road too with some models).
Additionally if you are the Last of the Late Brakers, you may notice that the brakes are completely consistent no matter how long you stay on track.
Fundamentally, if you like the look of them (plus the wheels that come with them), and you can afford them, why not?
There may be other Options and Accessories that you prefer for the money however.
Have fun.
So:
No brake dust;
Never having to replace the pads/disks (unless you keep it for a really long time...);
Bragging rights.
If you track it, you may also benefit from reduced unsprung weight and rotational inertia (the latter can be felt on the road too with some models).
Additionally if you are the Last of the Late Brakers, you may notice that the brakes are completely consistent no matter how long you stay on track.
Fundamentally, if you like the look of them (plus the wheels that come with them), and you can afford them, why not?
There may be other Options and Accessories that you prefer for the money however.
Have fun.
#11
Oz may however be considered to be suffering from some "Confirmation Bias" in his assertion that the methodology was flawed. I miss-quoted the article, but that's not the same as flaws in the methodology of the test itself.
So:
No brake dust;
Never having to replace the pads/disks (unless you keep it for a really long time...);
Bragging rights.
If you track it, you may also benefit from reduced unsprung weight and rotational inertia (the latter can be felt on the road too with some models).
Additionally if you are the Last of the Late Brakers, you may notice that the brakes are completely consistent no matter how long you stay on track.
Fundamentally, if you like the look of them (plus the wheels that come with them), and you can afford them, why not?
There may be other Options and Accesories that you prefer for the money however.
Have fun.
So:
No brake dust;
Never having to replace the pads/disks (unless you keep it for a really long time...);
Bragging rights.
If you track it, you may also benefit from reduced unsprung weight and rotational inertia (the latter can be felt on the road too with some models).
Additionally if you are the Last of the Late Brakers, you may notice that the brakes are completely consistent no matter how long you stay on track.
Fundamentally, if you like the look of them (plus the wheels that come with them), and you can afford them, why not?
There may be other Options and Accesories that you prefer for the money however.
Have fun.
I did warn you, SoCalJagS, didn't I?
FTypical... The irons completely failed at one point in the test where they then stopped it. The CCB's didn't show any sign of fade, but Evo chose to stop the test at the same point, and then draw the conclusion that the irons are somehow better because they're cheaper and their average stopping time over their limited life before failure was comparative to the CCB's. Huh??? If they had've done a CCB test up to their point of failure first, looked at that average, then tried to get the irons to match that, they would've drawn a totally different conclusion ( after they stopped laughing )!
Anyway, I just pointed him to the thread and suggested he draw his own conclusions.
The following users liked this post:
OzRisk (03-03-2015)
#14
#15
#16
#18
When I ordered my car I ended up with pretty much every major option, other than suede, pano roof and ceramic brakes.. the one that I should have ordered? The Ceramic Brakes.. they look great and no brake dust which is a big deal to me.
I will have to see what pads I can order that will reduce the copious amount of dust that these brakes produce.
Lawrence
I will have to see what pads I can order that will reduce the copious amount of dust that these brakes produce.
Lawrence
#19
Then on top of that is our 10% Goods and Sales Tax, so more hard earned dollars off to fund govt inefficiency.
Shipping costs to Aus probably cost a little bit more too. And we have a smaller market, which means individual margins need to stay high at the premium end or those dealers would struggle to survive.
But yes, there is a large component that is unexplainable.
We know we're being screwed, but for heavens sake, they don't even kiss us first!
Last edited by OzRisk; 03-03-2015 at 07:15 PM.