F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

F Type R - RWD vs AWD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-22-2014, 02:47 PM
RobsnTX's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 125
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
Question F Type R - RWD vs AWD

From what I am seeing online, Jaguar has announced that beginning with the 2016 model year they will no longer offer RWD in the F Type models in the United States markets. I don't believe that the 2016 pricing is out yet, and I am not aware that there are any other changes being made to the car other than switching to AWD, however I would assume that adding AWD will increase the price.


My question and quandary is: Is AWD something that is not needed in warm climates (I live in Houston, TX)? I don't drive my current RWD Jag XK if it is raining and haven't felt it to be an issue, however it is not powered like the Type R. The F Type will not be a daily driver, but will be a "fun" car for off work times. I heard that the AWD is heavier, and will require a slightly redesigned hood to accommodate the change. I sort of think that the RWD will be fine (and maybe more desirable from a purest point of view), but if it really makes the car handle so much better in all climates as well as improve the resale value, maybe I should wait to order a 2016, instead of ordering a 2015. Thoughts or opinions?
 
  #2  
Old 11-22-2014, 03:02 PM
qictrk's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Aptos, California, USA
Posts: 92
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I have just ordered the 2016 and don't see any changes, other than the AWD. The salesman said that the price should be listed as soon as the confirmation comes back next week. The only reason I ordered the AWD, was for the traction. But, if the difference is what I consider to high a price, then I will probably change it to a 2015.
Cecil.............
 
The following users liked this post:
RobsnTX (11-22-2014)
  #3  
Old 11-22-2014, 03:09 PM
buickfunnycar.com's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 1,924
Received 334 Likes on 232 Posts
Default

I thought the order bank was closed for MY2015....no?
 
  #4  
Old 11-22-2014, 03:10 PM
Lothar52's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,473
Received 370 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Improved tech with the new in control app thingy...

Also steering is now electric and replaced hydraulic...

More carbon fiber options including a carbon fiber roof!
 
The following users liked this post:
RobsnTX (11-22-2014)
  #5  
Old 11-22-2014, 03:13 PM
RobsnTX's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 125
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by buickfunnycar.com
I thought the order bank was closed for MY2015....no?
My understanding is that you can still order a 2015 - the local dealers have 2015 cars on order that haven't even been started, and they are telling me that I can modify the order for whatever I want.
 
  #6  
Old 11-22-2014, 03:29 PM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,028 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

It is heavier, sits a little higher, the hood has a wider bulge, and hood vents are relocated (further apart and more forward) to accommodate both a higher engine mounting necessary for the transfer case and for better cooling.

Despite the extra weight, it should be quicker than the RWD because of better traction. Getting all that power stuck to the ground is a major limiting factor in the current RWD R.

A UK member said it was several thousand (UK pounds) more expensive than the RWD, which would translate to $6-8K USD, but their pricing is considerably higher than in the U.S.
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Foosh:
Panthro (06-04-2024), RobsnTX (11-22-2014)
  #7  
Old 11-22-2014, 03:34 PM
qictrk's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Aptos, California, USA
Posts: 92
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by buickfunnycar.com
I thought the order bank was closed for MY2015....no?
The salesman at Monterey told me that I took the last slot for the 2016 today. Now, who knows if that's real. I don't know about the 2015. Cecil............
 
  #8  
Old 11-22-2014, 03:37 PM
RobsnTX's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 125
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
It is heavier, sits a little higher, the hood has a wider bulge, and hood vents are relocated (further apart and more forward) to accommodate both a higher engine mounting necessary for the transfer case and for better cooling.

Despite the extra weight, it should be quicker than the RWD because of better traction. Getting all that power stuck to the ground is a major limiting factor in the current RWD R.

A UK member said it was several thousand (UK pounds) more expensive than the RWD, which would translate to $6-8K USD, but their pricing is considerably higher than in the U.S.
I also remember someone telling me that if you have AWD that the tires need to be the same size, versus larger rear wheels on the RWD version. That alone might move me to get the RWD - it should look better, especially from behind.
 
  #9  
Old 11-22-2014, 04:39 PM
WaltB's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 207
Received 98 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

TRACTION!!!!

In my tuned AWD 997 Turbo S when I accelerate hard the beast leaps forward. In my tuned V8S when I accelerate hard the rear wheels spin in 1st, 2nd or early 3rd gear.

Not sure why the front and rear wheels would need to be the same size on the Jag. They are not in the AWD 911 series.

Walt
 
The following users liked this post:
RobsnTX (11-22-2014)
  #10  
Old 11-22-2014, 04:43 PM
shift's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,056
Received 580 Likes on 340 Posts
Default

I would expect around a $5K +/- extra for the RWD. Regarding RWD vs AWD, if you are in drier climates or don't drive in the wet, I think it just comes down to preference. The AWD will no doubt giver you better acceleration and corner exit speeds, but let's be real, no one is buying the F-Type to set the fastest lap times or be a tenth quicker drag racing on the streets. Look at the AWD in the Turbo S or GTR, can do amazing things at putting down the power. Yet, many people (probably majority) prefer the RWD variants of the 911 even though by all accounts they have a very good, seamless AWD system. I suppose one way to answer your question is, would you buy a 2015 Carrera S RWD or AWD?
 
The following users liked this post:
RobsnTX (11-22-2014)
  #11  
Old 11-22-2014, 04:49 PM
RickyJay52's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northeast
Posts: 3,395
Received 1,601 Likes on 861 Posts
Default

The way I see it (in other words, in my opinion):

All of life is a compromise

We all must make our own decisions (not just in general but specifically when it comes to, increasingly, ALL the options and configurations of the F-Type ...it's enough to drive anyone mad)

While AWD has its benefits and proponents, it also have its drawbacks and detractors (real and imagined)

As mentioned here in another thread, there is always bound to be something new and improved next week, next month, next year(s). Which means...

Carpe diem!!! (Worked for me and my 2015 V6S which I couldn't be happier with).

My 2-cents.
 

Last edited by RickyJay52; 11-22-2014 at 04:56 PM.
The following users liked this post:
RobsnTX (11-22-2014)
  #12  
Old 11-22-2014, 05:11 PM
Lovemonet's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 449
Received 105 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

It really is a matter of personal preference. I prefer sports cars with RWD. I also prefer hydraulic steering and one of the reasons I chose the F-Type R was because it had hydraulic steering while most other sports cars now have electronic steering. I am glad I chose the 2015 model as it will be last version of the F-Type R with both RWD and hydraulic steering.
 
The following users liked this post:
RobsnTX (11-22-2014)
  #13  
Old 11-22-2014, 05:15 PM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,028 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WaltB
TRACTION!!!!

In my tuned AWD 997 Turbo S when I accelerate hard the beast leaps forward. In my tuned V8S when I accelerate hard the rear wheels spin in 1st, 2nd or early 3rd gear.

Not sure why the front and rear wheels would need to be the same size on the Jag. They are not in the AWD 911 series.

Walt
+1
 
  #14  
Old 11-22-2014, 05:25 PM
Mulmur's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Mulmur, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,420
Received 259 Likes on 205 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
+1
Just a guess.. however the 'originator' of the thought concerning front and rear having same size wheels might have meant doing an after market taller tire on the rear.. the rear wheels would now turn at a different rate relative to the front as originally designed. As long as a different tire height front to rear is designed in, no probem... etc. etc..

Same for my 4 wheel vehicles.

The jaguar engineers claim 100% power to the rear wheels with their awd system, until slip is detected and I believe also in certain cornering situations... so it should feel the same to drive as rwd in standard street situations.. more or less.
Lawrence.
 

Last edited by Mulmur; 11-22-2014 at 05:27 PM.
  #15  
Old 11-23-2014, 03:54 PM
Stohlen's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,032
Received 642 Likes on 411 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RobsnTX
I also remember someone telling me that if you have AWD that the tires need to be the same size, versus larger rear wheels on the RWD version. That alone might move me to get the RWD - it should look better, especially from behind.
The tires must be the same height, but not the same width. On the RWD R, the rear tires are actually shorter than the fronts, so i would assume you're referring to the width of the tires being staggered. Which they can still be.



Other notable changes for 2016. The center console around the shifter is changed slightly. Many many more standard options, which has lowered the possible combinations significantly (i've been told that the starting price will be the same plus about $3-4k for AWD), and the ground effects are body colored on AWD models (which i hate for the rear diffuser). See the order guide i posted in my order thread for the full list of changes. Everything yellow is new or changed.
 
  #16  
Old 11-26-2014, 06:26 AM
JBsC6's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Rear wheel drive for theOP in warm no snow part of the country....

In the northeast I believe the AWD take rate will be around 80 percent...

Beautiful car!

Good luck
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shawn Svacha
X-Type ( X400 )
16
11-04-2019 02:47 PM
ZJag
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
26
09-05-2016 03:33 PM
raffoulig
F-Type ( X152 )
46
09-08-2015 01:56 AM
KarimPA
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
8
09-03-2015 07:32 PM
nd143
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
1
09-03-2015 04:42 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: F Type R - RWD vs AWD



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:08 PM.