F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

F-Type SVR Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #181  
Old 01-24-2016, 01:39 AM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,661 Likes on 3,366 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cbroth1
Absolutely!!
ok, so ante up the money (about $1700 plus loss of engine warranty) and let VMax do a tune for you.. We know with an upper pulley and tune alone that VMax can get close to 430 hp from the 3.0L. That puts the 5.0L within easy reach of 715hp. A lower pulley, properly designed long tube headers and a less restrictive converter can only take that number higher. Are you in?
 
  #182  
Old 01-24-2016, 09:08 AM
cbroth1's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Diego
Posts: 305
Received 81 Likes on 50 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by Unhingd
ok, so ante up the money (about $1700 plus loss of engine warranty) and let VMax do a tune for you.. We know with an upper pulley and tune alone that VMax can get close to 430 hp from the 3.0L. That puts the 5.0L within easy reach of 715hp. A lower pulley, properly designed long tube headers and a less restrictive converter can only take that number higher. Are you in?
I'm already in...
 
  #183  
Old 01-24-2016, 05:36 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,661 Likes on 3,366 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cbroth1
I'm already in...
Welcome to the land of the terminally unhinged.
 
The following users liked this post:
Uncle Fishbits (01-26-2016)
  #184  
Old 01-25-2016, 02:55 AM
thisissparta's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austria
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
  #185  
Old 01-25-2016, 07:02 AM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,661 Likes on 3,366 Posts
Default

A couple new (to me) things here: the titanium and nickle-chrome exhaust system (for weight) and the 265 tires in front/315 tires in back. The other upgrades noted were already well publicized.
 
  #186  
Old 01-25-2016, 10:40 AM
Arne's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 1,100
Received 338 Likes on 213 Posts
Default

I am a bit surpriced that they have not managed to shave off more weight.

It is still heavier than a standard rwd R...
 
  #187  
Old 01-25-2016, 11:08 AM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,028 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Arne
I am a bit surpriced that they have not managed to shave off more weight.

It is still heavier than a standard rwd R...
+1 and considerably heavier than a base V6. I think that is just ridiculous!
 
  #188  
Old 01-25-2016, 01:29 PM
cbroth1's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Diego
Posts: 305
Received 81 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
+1 and considerably heavier than a base V6. I think that is just ridiculous!
+1, There is no point to this car other than status. I do like the front end though. I will be creating my own "SVR" for about $50K less.
 
  #189  
Old 01-25-2016, 01:38 PM
thisissparta's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austria
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cbroth1
+1, There is no point to this car other than status. I do like the front end though. I will be creating my own "SVR" for about $50K less.
agreed.

ill put the front if possible on my v6s, there is no point to get the svr over the r imho, especially as the fixed spoiler is damn ugly
 
  #190  
Old 01-25-2016, 11:27 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,661 Likes on 3,366 Posts
Default

This is what I would have paid $160k+ for:

1. 625-650 hp V8 5.0L Coupe
2. SVR front facia with real brake cooling vents.
3. 20" carbon fiber wheels 9.5x20" front, 11.0x20 rear.
4. Michelin PSC2 265/35 front, 305/30 rear
5. Carbon fiber roof.
6. 7 speed (2 O.D. gears) manual transmission (no clutch delay valve)
7. carbon/ceramic brakes
8. no A/C
9. RWD only
10. Lightweight Recaro buckets (manual 3 way adjustment).
11. Convertible 6pt. to 3pt. seat belts.
12. Minimum legally required number of airbags.
15. No infotainment system.
16. Touchscreen only for system readout and setup.
17. Integrated removable rollcage.
18. Suspension 1.5" less than R. (matching dampening and anti-sway bars)
19. Computer modulated spoiler deployment (variable extension based on speed)
20. Torsen style mechanical LSD
21. TVB
22. Manual hatch.
23. fixed vents
24. Manually adjusted mirrors.
25. True short shifter (7cm or less)
26. 2015 style side skirts (flat black)
27. Badged V8U

Probably cheaper to build than an R, but this would be my idea of a super car.
 

Last edited by Unhingd; 01-25-2016 at 11:39 PM.
  #191  
Old 01-26-2016, 08:02 AM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,028 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
This is what I would have paid $160k+ for:

1. 625-650 hp V8 5.0L Coupe
2. SVR front facia with real brake cooling vents.
3. 20" carbon fiber wheels 9.5x20" front, 11.0x20 rear.
4. Michelin PSC2 265/35 front, 305/30 rear
5. Carbon fiber roof.
6. 7 speed (2 O.D. gears) manual transmission (no clutch delay valve)
7. carbon/ceramic brakes
8. no A/C
9. RWD only
10. Lightweight Recaro buckets (manual 3 way adjustment).
11. Convertible 6pt. to 3pt. seat belts.
12. Minimum legally required number of airbags.
15. No infotainment system.
16. Touchscreen only for system readout and setup.
17. Integrated removable rollcage.
18. Suspension 1.5" less than R. (matching dampening and anti-sway bars)
19. Computer modulated spoiler deployment (variable extension based on speed)
20. Torsen style mechanical LSD
21. TVB
22. Manual hatch.
23. fixed vents
24. Manually adjusted mirrors.
25. True short shifter (7cm or less)
26. 2015 style side skirts (flat black)
27. Badged V8U

Probably cheaper to build than an R, but this would be my idea of a super car.
+1, you're on the right track for a true performance-oriented car by leaving a lot of heavy accessories off, BUT I think the entire Jaguar line-up could benefit from R&D funds invested in finding lighter weight alternatives for nuts, bolts, and every component going into the car.

That would also help the company meet its ever-tightening CAFE requirements, while improving overall performance. The future alternative will be ever smaller engines with reduced output.
 
  #192  
Old 01-26-2016, 09:18 AM
LobsterClaws's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 928
Received 218 Likes on 160 Posts
Default

So, not being someone that tracks my car a lot, the above couple of posts have left me with a couple questions.

For $160k+, if you really want a hardcore track monster, why not do a focused 911 build? I think it's unarguably the better track car. Where the F-Type excels IMO is as a very powerful street cruiser.

Not saying you are wrong in your opinion, just that I want to understand it better.
 
  #193  
Old 01-26-2016, 01:48 PM
Uncle Fishbits's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tiburon, CA
Posts: 2,770
Received 714 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

I apologize if this has been seen on this thread:
Jaguar F-Type SVR | Leaked photos, details, specs | Digital Trends

200mph SVR leaks online.... I am sure I am way late to the party
 
  #194  
Old 01-26-2016, 06:58 PM
shift's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,056
Received 580 Likes on 340 Posts
Default

A single, official photo from Jaguar ahead of the Geneva debut. The front looks good, except for that stupid cross bar!!!!

 
  #195  
Old 01-26-2016, 07:06 PM
shift's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,056
Received 580 Likes on 340 Posts
  #196  
Old 01-26-2016, 09:54 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,661 Likes on 3,366 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
.... BUT I think the entire Jaguar line-up could benefit from R&D funds invested in finding lighter weight alternatives for nuts, bolts, and every component going into the car.
+1.

Originally Posted by LobsterClaws
For $160k+, if you really want a hardcore track monster, why not do a focused 911 build? I think it's unarguably the better track car. Where the F-Type excels IMO is as a very powerful street cruiser.
Mostly because the 911 is butt ugly (of course, IMO), and is a tired design from the mid-'60s. After 50 years, I have gotten tired of looking at them.
 
  #197  
Old 01-27-2016, 08:22 AM
Dogbreath!'s Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: People's Republik of MD
Posts: 641
Received 176 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shift
The front looks good, except for that stupid cross bar!!!!
I bet the cross bar is to meet European pedestrian safety standards.
 
  #198  
Old 01-27-2016, 10:58 AM
Schwabe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Grasonville, MD
Posts: 2,042
Received 443 Likes on 323 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JagRag
2017 Jaguar F-Type SVR™, MSRP Coupé: US$179,925.00


2017 Jaguar F-Type SVR™, MSRP Convertible: US$186,925.00


... and those we will be able to buy a year later for $50k less ... they will drop like rocks in value ...
 
  #199  
Old 01-27-2016, 11:07 AM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,028 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Schwabe
... and those we will be able to buy a year later for $50k less ... they will drop like rocks in value ...
Yep, but I'd venture to guess under $100K in a year or so because I don't see a market for it. It just doesn't deliver really anything more than an aggressive look, and as a late Governor of Texas said in reference to a wannabe cowboy . . . "all hat and no gun."
 
  #200  
Old 01-27-2016, 01:11 PM
Schwabe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Grasonville, MD
Posts: 2,042
Received 443 Likes on 323 Posts
Default

Just read in the German brochure that to reach 200mph you have to enter VMax mode in Dynamic mode. This is done by pressing the rear spoiler button for three seconds which then puts the spoiler in the lowest position to reduce drag ....
 


Quick Reply: F-Type SVR Discussion Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 PM.