Found silver kitty
#2
#3
#4
The following users liked this post:
Noshame (09-25-2020)
#5
#6
The following 2 users liked this post by linklaw:
Burt Gummer (09-26-2020),
Carbuff2 (09-26-2020)
#7
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The contrast in size between the two is really stunning. I'll bet a lot of the width of current cars has to do with the side impact protection, which was pretty much non existent in an E Type.
I am reminded of a friend who had a 1974 Triumph TR-6. I was driving it one time and noticed that I could touch the top of the door on the passenger side with my outstretched arm. That was one narrow cockpit and I have a 33" sleeve length and not gorilla arms !
I am reminded of a friend who had a 1974 Triumph TR-6. I was driving it one time and noticed that I could touch the top of the door on the passenger side with my outstretched arm. That was one narrow cockpit and I have a 33" sleeve length and not gorilla arms !
Trending Topics
#8
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just look at the differences between the original Mini and todays!
![Icon Eek](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
I am reminded of a friend who had a 1974 Triumph TR-6. I was driving it one time and noticed that I could touch the top of the door on the passenger side with my outstretched arm. That was one narrow cockpit and I have a 33" sleeve length and not gorilla arms !
++++++++++++++
But, I like to look on both sides of the argument. Today's wider cars (and the included wider windscreens) have made room for other stuff, like radar detectors, phone mounts, GPS...
![Icon Couchhide](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_couchhide.gif)
The following users liked this post:
Burt Gummer (09-26-2020)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)