F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Had F Type S (V6) dynoed. What's average?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-14-2017, 03:38 PM
Dan's cat's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 143
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Had F Type S (V6) dynoed. What's average?

Hi all,

I had my car dynoed yesterday. Best of three pulls was 343 hp & 301 tq to the wheels. What is the normal % of loss? What were numbers for some of you that have tested your stock V6s models?

Thanks!
 
  #2  
Old 05-14-2017, 03:45 PM
Stohlen's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,032
Received 642 Likes on 411 Posts
Default

Seems like you're a tad on the high side. But not unusual numbers.
 
The following users liked this post:
Dan's cat (05-14-2017)
  #3  
Old 05-14-2017, 08:33 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,661 Likes on 3,366 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stohlen
Seems like you're a tad on the high side. But not unusual numbers.
Chances are, they did it on an inertial dyno like the Mustang. Those always seem to read high. To Dan's question, the drivetrain loss is around 15% on an RWD, so divide the dyno results by 0.85.
 
The following users liked this post:
Dan's cat (05-14-2017)
  #4  
Old 05-14-2017, 09:00 PM
Dan's cat's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 143
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
Chances are, they did it on an inertial dyno like the Mustang. Those always seem to read high. To Dan's question, the drivetrain loss is around 15% on an RWD, so divide the dyno results by 0.85.
I don't understand. Why would I have to divide the results if those are the numbers at the wheels? What am I missing? Or, are you telling me this is how I measure crank numbers?
 
  #5  
Old 05-14-2017, 09:04 PM
Dan's cat's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 143
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

lol Duh... Sorry. Brain fart, I guess... Dividing the 343 by .85 gives me 403 hp. Are these inertial dynos that far off?
 
  #6  
Old 05-14-2017, 09:10 PM
Stohlen's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 2,032
Received 642 Likes on 411 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan's cat
lol Duh... Sorry. Brain fart, I guess... Dividing the 343 by .85 gives me 403 hp. Are these inertial dynos that far off?
Absolutely. No two dynos will measure the same, and a dyno will measure different on different days due to conditions.
 
  #7  
Old 05-14-2017, 09:12 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,661 Likes on 3,366 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan's cat
lol Duh... Sorry. Brain fart, I guess... Dividing the 343 by .85 gives me 403 hp. Are these inertial dynos that far off?
Can be. No easy way to calibrate them, and having to only overcome roller inertia rather than having an actual load applied will generally yield slightly higher numbers.
 
  #8  
Old 05-14-2017, 11:29 PM
Dan's cat's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 143
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Oh, I see. What kind of dyno should I look for?
 
  #9  
Old 05-15-2017, 07:22 AM
jfranks's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 258
Received 46 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan's cat
Oh, I see. What kind of dyno should I look for?
Mustang dyno = dream maker

Dynojet = heart breaker
 
  #10  
Old 05-15-2017, 09:19 AM
Dan's cat's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 143
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jfranks
Mustang dyno = dream maker

Dynojet = heart breaker

So, should I still be happy?? Lol This was a dynojet.

 
  #11  
Old 05-15-2017, 10:54 AM
caviarjag's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Westchester
Posts: 335
Received 55 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jfranks
Mustang dyno = dream maker

Dynojet = heart breaker
dynojets also tend to read optimistic. You are probably thinking dyno dynamics. Dynos are just a tool. Great for before and after comparisons, but not a lot more than a fun gimmick if for one time use. They can give you a ballpark, but 20% variation dyno to dyno depending on brand and calibration isn't crazy.
 
The following users liked this post:
jfranks (05-15-2017)
  #12  
Old 05-15-2017, 11:16 AM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,661 Likes on 3,366 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan's cat
So, should I still be happy?? Lol This was a dynojet.
The Dynojet will also read high unless they have the optional Eddy Current Load Control installed. You'll have to ask the dyno shop. I always look for a Dynapack machine.
 
  #13  
Old 05-15-2017, 11:35 AM
Ranchero50's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Hagerstown MD
Posts: 2,936
Received 970 Likes on 654 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan's cat
lol Duh... Sorry. Brain fart, I guess... Dividing the 343 by .85 gives me 403 hp. Are these inertial dynos that far off?
I think you missed the point. The 15% is drive line losses, turning the trans, rear gears etc. So your engine is putting out a theoretical 403 hp but you only seeing 343 at the wheels. It's all funny numbers and pretty meaningless except for back to back tests on the same machines after a modifications.

It's also worth noting that the ECU may be pulling power out or adding power as it doesn't see the engine loading like it normally does on the street. That was discussed in past threads about getting repeatable numbers and how some graphs look 'unusual'. Without knowing exactly what the processor is trying to do the value of the dyno run is suspect.

A timed run up a grade will give similar data.
 
  #14  
Old 05-15-2017, 07:35 PM
Dan's cat's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 143
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ranchero50
I think you missed the point. The 15% is drive line losses, turning the trans, rear gears etc. So your engine is putting out a theoretical 403 hp but you only seeing 343 at the wheels. It's all funny numbers and pretty meaningless except for back to back tests on the same machines after a modifications.

It's also worth noting that the ECU may be pulling power out or adding power as it doesn't see the engine loading like it normally does on the street. That was discussed in past threads about getting repeatable numbers and how some graphs look 'unusual'. Without knowing exactly what the processor is trying to do the value of the dyno run is suspect.

A timed run up a grade will give similar data.
thanks for the info, I understood what you were explaining about the 403 hp and that being at the crank. I've been around cars, mods and dynos most of my adult life, just never with a Jag. That's why I was asking about the percentage of drive train loss. Well, I assume that the only thing I should do at this point is make sure and go back to the same dyno after the mods for comparison.
 
  #15  
Old 05-15-2017, 08:06 PM
SinF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Canada, eh
Posts: 6,987
Received 2,141 Likes on 1,461 Posts
Default

I hope there is fan somewhere out of the picture, otherwise you are torturing your car.
 
  #16  
Old 05-15-2017, 09:19 PM
Dan's cat's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 143
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SinF
I hope there is fan somewhere out of the picture, otherwise you are torturing your car.

Haha No doubt! Yes, that pic was before it was all set to go.
 
  #17  
Old 05-16-2017, 12:26 AM
Dan's cat's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 143
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
Chances are, they did it on an inertial dyno like the Mustang. Those always seem to read high. To Dan's question, the drivetrain loss is around 15% on an RWD, so divide the dyno results by 0.85.
It was a dynojet, but I noticed your response on the other thread. The tech did all three of my pulls in 4th gear. Is this why the numbers were high?
 
  #18  
Old 05-16-2017, 06:42 AM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,661 Likes on 3,366 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dan's cat
It was a dynojet, but I noticed your response on the other thread. The tech did all three of my pulls in 4th gear. Is this why the numbers were high?
No, the gear shouldn't matter much. 4th gear is the correct gear to dyno the MT. Maybe 5th gear for the AT. That get's you to around 135mph at redline.
 
  #19  
Old 05-16-2017, 10:26 AM
Dan's cat's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 143
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
No, the gear shouldn't matter much. 4th gear is the correct gear to dyno the MT. Maybe 5th gear for the AT. That get's you to around 135mph at redline.
oh, ok. Mine is an auto, so I thought doing the pulls in 4th may have had something to do with it.
 

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 PM.