Had F Type S (V6) dynoed. What's average?
#1
#3
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Chances are, they did it on an inertial dyno like the Mustang. Those always seem to read high. To Dan's question, the drivetrain loss is around 15% on an RWD, so divide the dyno results by 0.85.
The following users liked this post:
Dan's cat (05-14-2017)
#4
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't understand. Why would I have to divide the results if those are the numbers at the wheels? What am I missing? Or, are you telling me this is how I measure crank numbers?
#6
#7
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Can be. No easy way to calibrate them, and having to only overcome roller inertia rather than having an actual load applied will generally yield slightly higher numbers.
Trending Topics
#11
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
dynojets also tend to read optimistic. You are probably thinking dyno dynamics. Dynos are just a tool. Great for before and after comparisons, but not a lot more than a fun gimmick if for one time use. They can give you a ballpark, but 20% variation dyno to dyno depending on brand and calibration isn't crazy.
The following users liked this post:
jfranks (05-15-2017)
#12
#13
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's also worth noting that the ECU may be pulling power out or adding power as it doesn't see the engine loading like it normally does on the street. That was discussed in past threads about getting repeatable numbers and how some graphs look 'unusual'. Without knowing exactly what the processor is trying to do the value of the dyno run is suspect.
A timed run up a grade will give similar data.
#14
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think you missed the point. The 15% is drive line losses, turning the trans, rear gears etc. So your engine is putting out a theoretical 403 hp but you only seeing 343 at the wheels. It's all funny numbers and pretty meaningless except for back to back tests on the same machines after a modifications.
It's also worth noting that the ECU may be pulling power out or adding power as it doesn't see the engine loading like it normally does on the street. That was discussed in past threads about getting repeatable numbers and how some graphs look 'unusual'. Without knowing exactly what the processor is trying to do the value of the dyno run is suspect.
A timed run up a grade will give similar data.
It's also worth noting that the ECU may be pulling power out or adding power as it doesn't see the engine loading like it normally does on the street. That was discussed in past threads about getting repeatable numbers and how some graphs look 'unusual'. Without knowing exactly what the processor is trying to do the value of the dyno run is suspect.
A timed run up a grade will give similar data.
#15
#16
#17
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It was a dynojet, but I noticed your response on the other thread. The tech did all three of my pulls in 4th gear. Is this why the numbers were high?
#18
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No, the gear shouldn't matter much. 4th gear is the correct gear to dyno the MT. Maybe 5th gear for the AT. That get's you to around 135mph at redline.
#19