How reliable is the p300?
#21
I tried to find sales numbers that would show how many 4 cylinder f-types were sold compared to the v6 and v8. Couldn’t seem to find that info. Anyone know?
Did the 4 cylinder outsell the v6 and v8?
I’m going to bet it did because of its relative “affordability”, cheaper access to the same beautiful design, etc.
Did the 4 cylinder outsell the v6 and v8?
I’m going to bet it did because of its relative “affordability”, cheaper access to the same beautiful design, etc.
#22
In the past in the UK it's been variously based on engine capacity and emissions, but now all cars carry the same level of tax regardless of engine (even EVs have to pay it from next year!). For new cars there's a hefty fee up front, and then a "luxury car tax" added until the car's 6th birthday - in this case a luxury car is any costing over £40,000.
I can't speak for EU taxation, but I know that in the Netherlands big engines are very heavily taxed.
I can't speak for EU taxation, but I know that in the Netherlands big engines are very heavily taxed.
The following users liked this post:
Tayls77 (08-22-2024)
#23
I have owned a 2.0 for 6 years.
Good acceleration. Mine has the smaller wheels that make it faster. I know how to use traction control. 0-60 is faster than most of the muscle cars of the 60's. only the limited edition factory made race cars are faster from that period.
Driving 80 mph all day the car gets above 30 mpg. Reasonable insurance,
Since it is lighter in the front it should corner better than the heavier front cars.
No cooling pipe issues.
My issues in 6 years is a broken plastic switch. Ham fisted Jag mechanic I think. He broke it changing oil. Now the battery is headed south. Otherwise changing oil only.
I like mine.
Good acceleration. Mine has the smaller wheels that make it faster. I know how to use traction control. 0-60 is faster than most of the muscle cars of the 60's. only the limited edition factory made race cars are faster from that period.
Driving 80 mph all day the car gets above 30 mpg. Reasonable insurance,
Since it is lighter in the front it should corner better than the heavier front cars.
No cooling pipe issues.
My issues in 6 years is a broken plastic switch. Ham fisted Jag mechanic I think. He broke it changing oil. Now the battery is headed south. Otherwise changing oil only.
I like mine.
I’m 49, driving since 16 years of age, perfect record…Still crazy…
#24
I tried to find sales numbers that would show how many 4 cylinder f-types were sold compared to the v6 and v8. Couldn’t seem to find that info. Anyone know?
Did the 4 cylinder outsell the v6 and v8?
I’m going to bet it did because of its relative “affordability”, cheaper access to the same beautiful design, etc.
Did the 4 cylinder outsell the v6 and v8?
I’m going to bet it did because of its relative “affordability”, cheaper access to the same beautiful design, etc.
The following users liked this post:
Cosshog (Yesterday)
#25
I recently read a passing comment on some YouTube video somewhere suggesting that the 4 cylinder accounted for half of the sales. So I wanted to take a look at the numbers…People can say all kinds of thing though, don’t mean it’s true…
Last edited by DMeister; 08-22-2024 at 08:00 AM.
#26
Insurance wise my wife drives a 2016 Ram Heavy duty Diesel pickup. Insurance from one of the top companies is $1100 per year. Full coverage.
My insurance for the the 2018 Ftype 2.0 is $1200 per year. Both vehicles are valued about the same.
I know in the past the engine size made a difference in Ohio.
As I have friends in Canada I can tell you it is hard to compere. So much there is taxed to oblivion.
My insurance for the the 2018 Ftype 2.0 is $1200 per year. Both vehicles are valued about the same.
I know in the past the engine size made a difference in Ohio.
As I have friends in Canada I can tell you it is hard to compere. So much there is taxed to oblivion.
#27
#28
Why do you think the smaller wheels make it faster? Less weight? The overall wheel and tyre size will be about the same regardless of wheel size so it can't be that. And faster than what - the V6?
#29
The place to never add weight is the wheel/tires. Lighter wheels sell for a reason besides looks.
bigger wider tires slow it a bit.
yes likely the diameter is similar but wider is heavier.
Car and a driver I believe tested a 2 liter with the big optional tires and had slower 0-60 times. Well over 6 seconds.
bigger wider tires slow it a bit.
yes likely the diameter is similar but wider is heavier.
Car and a driver I believe tested a 2 liter with the big optional tires and had slower 0-60 times. Well over 6 seconds.
#30
#31
The place to never add weight is the wheel/tires. Lighter wheels sell for a reason besides looks.
bigger wider tires slow it a bit.
yes likely the diameter is similar but wider is heavier.
Car and a driver I believe tested a 2 liter with the big optional tires and had slower 0-60 times. Well over 6 seconds.
bigger wider tires slow it a bit.
yes likely the diameter is similar but wider is heavier.
Car and a driver I believe tested a 2 liter with the big optional tires and had slower 0-60 times. Well over 6 seconds.
#32
I have had my 300 for 4 years now and love it. No major issues and hopefully getting radio update soon thx to class action suit. I did add Ragazzon exhuast for a more pleasurable sound which was the only thing I didn't care for stock.
Comparison is the thief of joy, go with what you want and enjoy it.
Comparison is the thief of joy, go with what you want and enjoy it.
The following 2 users liked this post by Cosshog:
DJS (Yesterday),
Thunderjet Racing (Yesterday)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 6 (0 members and 6 guests)