F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MT 1 Year Review (Pirelli P-Zeros vs Michelin Pilot Super Sports)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 07-05-2015, 07:45 PM
domino_z's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 656
Received 134 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

ever since buying my first set of mpss about 3 years ago, it is default tyre option for me on every car i buy, and f-type is no different (i already have a set waiting for my car to arrive in dec)

just threw away brand new set of oem conti's on my daily for the mpss - even had dealer put on a set of mpss on the porsche cgt i bought out of LA before having it flown home. those US prices make you lose sleep compared to what we pay locally
 
  #22  
Old 07-07-2015, 09:33 PM
StealthPilot's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: South east
Posts: 910
Received 147 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bjg625
I think the P-Zero's are sticky so they can max the specs for advertising. The PSS are the better all around for most of us, with Conti's next!
They aren't stickier than the PSS.
 
  #23  
Old 07-07-2015, 09:35 PM
StealthPilot's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: South east
Posts: 910
Received 147 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
The P-Zeros have a lower wear rating (220), suggesting that they are stickier than the PSS (300), but yes, the reliability of that rating system is questionable, at best. There must be something else about their construction driving the nearly universal perception that the PSS works better on the F-Type.
Wear rating has no direct connection to stickiness, because the compound technology is different. If you take an older design tire it will likely be worse on both dimensions. e.g. Michelin PS2 has lower wear rating and less stickiness than the Michelin PSS. The problem with the P Zero is that it is more like the PS2 when Michelin now has moved on to PSS compound technology.
 
  #24  
Old 07-07-2015, 10:58 PM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,028 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

I don't know how many more times I can say, I know the PSS is superior to the P-Zero. I was just trying to illustrate a point, and I'm also well aware that the rating system for tire wear is next to worthless. That was also part of the point.
 
  #25  
Old 07-10-2015, 03:34 AM
CHATEAUJAGUAR's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

are you guys refering to pzero summers or all seasons?
 
  #26  
Old 07-10-2015, 07:23 AM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,661 Likes on 3,366 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CHATEAUJAGUAR
are you guys refering to pzero summers or all seasons?
Summers. We're talking about the P-Zero summer tires and not the P-Zero Nero all-seasons which I don't believe come in F-Type sizes.
 

Last edited by Unhingd; 07-10-2015 at 07:38 AM.
  #27  
Old 07-10-2015, 09:37 AM
SkipM's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 262
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

3rd set of P-Zeroes went on at ~ 9.5k miles - they suck - I am going to MIchelin after
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wolfy
XJ ( X351 )
58
05-28-2024 08:06 AM
08Z06
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
2
10-24-2015 05:46 PM
philwarner
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
13
09-06-2015 11:10 PM
Jaguar Forums Editor
Jaguar Press release
0
09-05-2015 10:08 AM
Whitnessmouse
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
0
09-04-2015 11:09 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: MT 1 Year Review (Pirelli P-Zeros vs Michelin Pilot Super Sports)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 PM.