F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Prices go UP?!?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-26-2016, 06:01 PM
Lothar52's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,473
Received 370 Likes on 249 Posts
Default Prices go UP?!?!?

I periodically build out my next Jag...a F- Type V6 S AWD fully loaded... I used to be able to get it for about 92k...which I thought... hmmmmm.... thats almost as much at the original F-Type R. Tonight I built a 2017 F-Type V6 S AWD and fully loaded it got over 105k!! WHAT THE HECK!!
 
  #2  
Old 02-26-2016, 06:03 PM
JagRag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,165
Received 283 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Inflation.
 
  #3  
Old 02-26-2016, 06:40 PM
Orkney's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 261
Received 71 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Sorry, still worth that price. At least to me.

Orkney
 
  #4  
Old 02-26-2016, 06:51 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,661 Likes on 3,366 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lothar52
I periodically build out my next Jag...a F- Type V6 S AWD fully loaded... I used to be able to get it for about 92k...which I thought... hmmmmm.... thats almost as much at the original F-Type R. Tonight I built a 2017 F-Type V6 S AWD and fully loaded it got over 105k!! WHAT THE HECK!!
Apples to oranges. That $92k would buy you a loaded RWD S. AWD adds $ and a lot of weight (and that SUV feel we're all striving for)

Just joking...just joking!
 
The following users liked this post:
Lothar52 (02-26-2016)
  #5  
Old 02-26-2016, 07:04 PM
TXJagR's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,323
Received 295 Likes on 233 Posts
Default

FWIW when I was looking at buying my F-Type, I looked at an S and optioned out it was SO close to the R, I went for the R for the extra performance.
 
  #6  
Old 02-26-2016, 10:48 PM
IRRBrogue's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX 78732
Posts: 243
Received 24 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lothar52
I periodically build out my next Jag...a F- Type V6 S AWD fully loaded... I used to be able to get it for about 92k...which I thought... hmmmmm.... thats almost as much at the original F-Type R. Tonight I built a 2017 F-Type V6 S AWD and fully loaded it got over 105k!! WHAT THE HECK!!
There were some problems with the configurator. It kept adding the carbon fiber roof, or the red interior. Look closely at the summary.
 
  #7  
Old 02-27-2016, 03:14 AM
Merlin's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 603
Received 59 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXJagR
FWIW when I was looking at buying my F-Type, I looked at an S and optioned out it was SO close to the R, I went for the R for the extra performance.
Same for me. I think I made the right call.
 
  #8  
Old 02-27-2016, 09:39 AM
mshedden's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 701
Received 192 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Prices have gone up, and there are problems with the online configurator adding expensive stuff like the carbon roof for no reason (and the black pack has totally disappeared for the 'R' coupe...)

For some reason, the RWD V6 British Edition comes out looking like it almost might be 'a deal' compared to building one from scratch. Might be the same for the V6 AWD? And ULTRA BLUE....
 
  #9  
Old 02-27-2016, 12:36 PM
F-typical's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Herefordshire, England
Posts: 1,498
Received 179 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXJagR
FWIW when I was looking at buying my F-Type, I looked at an S and optioned out it was SO close to the R, I went for the R for the extra performance.
TXJagS... Sounds good...
 
  #10  
Old 02-27-2016, 01:48 PM
Dremorg's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 996
Received 116 Likes on 99 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXJagR
FWIW when I was looking at buying my F-Type, I looked at an S and optioned out it was SO close to the R, I went for the R for the extra performance.
Never even thought a second about any of the other models.
 
  #11  
Old 03-01-2016, 12:34 PM
Uncle Fishbits's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tiburon, CA
Posts: 2,770
Received 714 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
Apples to oranges. That $92k would buy you a loaded RWD S. AWD adds $ and a lot of weight (and that SUV feel we're all striving for)

Just joking...just joking!
out the door my base MT RWD after all my special touches was $90K. LOL mind you... out... tha... door. And as soon as I picked it up, I drove 3+ hours to Tahoe. That was a good day.

 
  #12  
Old 03-01-2016, 04:01 PM
bjg625's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: las vegas
Posts: 1,823
Received 213 Likes on 190 Posts
Default

The '16 was cheaper than my '14 SV6 conv. and the '17 is more expensive. You would think with strong dollar and weak pound prices would stay the same, but european cars keep going up.
 
  #13  
Old 03-02-2016, 10:02 AM
Uncle Fishbits's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tiburon, CA
Posts: 2,770
Received 714 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IRRBrogue
There were some problems with the configurator.
That thing sucks on the consumer facing side, and I've seen the sales rep's side at the dealer, that has a bit more of a back end and pricing, etc.... it also sucks.

3 or 4 times I had to vet my order because each time some random thing would be kicked off or not compatible. It's still pretty amazing to get such a highly customized car, but really that process was absolutely and completely miserable.
 

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 AM.