SVR - Fuel economy VS Driving mode and exhaust valve
#1
SVR - Fuel economy VS Driving mode and exhaust valve
Hello folks!
I read on another post that the 3 driving modes we have on the SVR, among other things, change the power distribution between front and rear.
According to your experience, which one causes the lowest fuel consumption?
Being Dynamic mode 90% RWD I tend to think that this is it, provided that one changes the gears at the same rpm as he would in Standard mode.
Also, "Snow" mode should be the least efficient with 50% RWD / AWD.
Am I wrong?
Also, how does the exhaust valve setting enter into this equation? It should increase the consumption a little (by how much?), but besides this, is there any benefit in terms of performance or drawback in terms of wear / reliability in keeping it open?
Thanks a lot for any clarifications you may provide!
I read on another post that the 3 driving modes we have on the SVR, among other things, change the power distribution between front and rear.
According to your experience, which one causes the lowest fuel consumption?
Being Dynamic mode 90% RWD I tend to think that this is it, provided that one changes the gears at the same rpm as he would in Standard mode.
Also, "Snow" mode should be the least efficient with 50% RWD / AWD.
Am I wrong?
Also, how does the exhaust valve setting enter into this equation? It should increase the consumption a little (by how much?), but besides this, is there any benefit in terms of performance or drawback in terms of wear / reliability in keeping it open?
Thanks a lot for any clarifications you may provide!
#2
The following users liked this post:
LilyKalendar (07-14-2021)
#3
That 90% number is not accurate. The F-TYPE AWD sends 100% of the power to the rear wheels unless they lose traction.
Operating on the torque-on-demand principle, the AWD system sends 100 per cent of the engine's torque to the rear wheels under normal driving conditions. This maintains the F-TYPE's rear-wheel drive handling characteristics and also reduces parasitic losses in the drivetrain.
If the system determines that the rear wheels are approaching the limit of available grip the electronically-controlled centre coupling transfers torque to the front axle, improving traction.
If the system determines that the rear wheels are approaching the limit of available grip the electronically-controlled centre coupling transfers torque to the front axle, improving traction.
The following 2 users liked this post by eeeeek:
LilyKalendar (07-14-2021),
newskatercat (07-13-2021)
#4
The following 3 users liked this post by scm:
#5
The following users liked this post:
LilyKalendar (07-14-2021)
#6
I think it's a fair question. I've driven down I-5 for several hours from Sacramento to Paso Robles and there aren't exactly turns on that road. I stuck the cruise control at x MPH, had the car in standard mode and got better than 28 mpg. I made up for that once the road got my interesting towards the coast.
The following 2 users liked this post by eeeeek:
LilyKalendar (07-14-2021),
scm (07-13-2021)
#8
The following users liked this post:
LilyKalendar (07-14-2021)
#9
You guys really aren't trying hard enough! I set my display to show instantaneous mpg and the best I've got is 3! Though it is impressive to cruise downhill off the throttle at legal speed limits at 99 mpg.
The following users liked this post:
mbelanger (07-15-2021)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jallitt
F-Type ( X152 )
1
01-23-2019 04:10 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)