F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tell me the negatives about the F-Type

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-13-2015, 06:35 PM
Bret_T's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Georgia
Posts: 289
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default Tell me the negatives about the F-Type

This is my first post, so please be gentle. When I first saw the F-Type I fell in love with its looks. It's just an incredibly beautiful car. Then I found out that it couldn't be purchased with a manual transmission. So, I ended up purchasing a 2014 BMW 435i MSport. After driving it for a while, I feel it's a pretty decent car, but there are a few negatives that I didn't anticipate which really take away from the car in my opinion. Not being able to drive an F-Type for a while, I'd like to know your opinion on the negatives. FYI, here are the major negatives I've found regarding my 435i: (1) Steering does not feel connected to the road. My Honda S2000 and Subaru WRX (previous daily driver) felt connected. I definitely want more feedback through the steering. (2) The 435i pours brake dust. In fact, it will dust more in one day than my wife's Toyota Sequoia will in three weeks. (3) The display for the stereo is awful. I can't believe I paid an extra $1000 for an upgraded stereo. (4) Cup holders are small and won't easily let go of cups that are put in them. So what are the negatives that one might not anticipate about the F-Type? Thanks in advance.
 
  #2  
Old 05-13-2015, 06:53 PM
LynxFX's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 969
Received 270 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Biggest negative is that I work only 5 blocks from my home so I can't drive my F-type every day.

This thread probably has what you are looking for.
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/f...f-type-138199/
 
The following 2 users liked this post by LynxFX:
Brutal (05-14-2015), Tar1018 (05-15-2015)
  #3  
Old 05-13-2015, 06:54 PM
TXJagR's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,323
Received 295 Likes on 233 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LynxFX
Biggest negative is that I work only 5 blocks from my home so I can't drive my F-type every day....


I'd just take the LONG way to work if I were you!
 
  #4  
Old 05-13-2015, 07:05 PM
LynxFX's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 969
Received 270 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXJagR
I'd just take the LONG way to work if I were you!
Haha, it's LA so technically, every road is the LONG way.
 
  #5  
Old 05-13-2015, 07:16 PM
BierNut's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 503
Received 121 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

The biggest negative with the F-Type is that you aren't currently driving one!

To quote Nike in the '90s; "Just do it!"
 
  #6  
Old 05-13-2015, 07:17 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,661 Likes on 3,366 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bret_T
Then I found out that it couldn't be purchased with a manual transmission. So, I ended up purchasing a 2014 BMW 435i MSport.
Don't have mine yet so I can't fairly answer your questions. Others, though, have elequently spoken to the car's shortcomings in a vast number of very recent threads.
My question for you is how you like the manual gearbox in your 435i? It's the exact same gearbox as in the F-Type (ZF S6-45).
 
  #7  
Old 05-13-2015, 07:53 PM
Bret_T's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Georgia
Posts: 289
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

It's not as good as the S2000, but still pretty decent. I did not realize they were the same. If I get one, I guess I'll have to live with that push forward for reverse thing.
 
  #8  
Old 05-14-2015, 07:41 AM
OzRisk's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,375
Received 251 Likes on 140 Posts
Default

Not sure what you are hoping to achieve by coming here fishing for negatives about a car you didn't buy, apart from making yourself feel better about a purchase decision you appear to be regretting.

Are you contemplating getting rid of your BMW in favour of an F Type? I would encourage you to do so if you have that option.

In short, my F Type R is simply awesome, and there is not one single aspect of the car that would make me regret buying it.
 
The following 5 users liked this post by OzRisk:
Brutal (05-14-2015), Foosh (05-14-2015), IRRBrogue (11-01-2015), RobsnTX (05-14-2015), Tar1018 (05-15-2015)
  #9  
Old 05-14-2015, 08:02 AM
Bret_T's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Georgia
Posts: 289
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OzRisk
Not sure what you are hoping to achieve by coming here fishing for negatives about a car you didn't buy, apart from making yourself feel better about a purchase decision you appear to be regretting.
I think that I've been pretty straight forward about what I'm hoping to accomplish, but I'll repeat. I likely would have purchased an F-Type a couple of years ago, but it wasn't available with a manual transmission. The 435i is a good car, but it doesn't have the sports car feel that I want. There are things about the 435i that I know now that if I had known then might have changed my purchasing decision. Therefore, I'd like to know what sort of things like this the F-Type might have. It's no more complicated than that. I'm just looking for intelligent feedback and don't have other psychological motivations.


Are you contemplating getting rid of your BMW in favour of an F Type? I would encourage you to do so if you have that option.
Yes. The BMW is currently my daily driver. I drive my S2000 about once a month.

In short, my F Type R is simply awesome, and there is not one single aspect of the car that would make me regret buying it.
That's the way I feel about my S2000. I guess there are things that could be better, but the car as a whole is so awesome that they don't even show up on my radar. The BMW is nice, but it just doesn't give me that same feel even though it is actually faster and significantly easier to push to the edge.
 
  #10  
Old 05-14-2015, 08:40 AM
DJS's Avatar
DJS
DJS is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Metrowest Boston
Posts: 6,286
Received 2,106 Likes on 1,406 Posts
Default

Are you thinking about the convertible? The extremely small trunk and lack of spare tire is an issue to some. I can get my golf clubs in the trunk, along with shoes and hats, but that's it. I'm planning to get a strap-on luggage carrier for longer trips if I have someone in the passenger seat. For now, luggage goes in the passenger seat.
 
  #11  
Old 05-14-2015, 08:54 AM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,028 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

The F-Type has little idiosyncracies as does every other vehicle. I regard them as completely trivial.

My view is it's better than any car I've every owned in terms of balancing pure driving pleasure with suitability as a daily-driver. I prefer it by leaps and bounds over any of the 8 BMWs I've owned in the past, including 3 M-cars, from 3 different generations. To boil it down to the simplest way of saying it, there is NO car I've liked more, and I've owned over 50 at this point in my life.
 
The following users liked this post:
Brutal (05-14-2015)
  #12  
Old 05-14-2015, 09:49 AM
SoCalJagS's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 643
Received 92 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LynxFX
Haha, it's LA so technically, every road is the LONG way.
Your correct, distance is usually measured in time, not miles!
 
  #13  
Old 05-14-2015, 10:27 AM
Schwabe's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Grasonville, MD
Posts: 2,042
Received 443 Likes on 323 Posts
Default

As much as I love my Jaguars and would not replace them, if you are looking for a light weight sports car feeling of the S2000 this is not it. I would say that I enjoy this car much more than I enjoyed my heavily modfied Cayman turbo with GT3 parts for suspension, clutch and flywheel ...
 
The following users liked this post:
Brutal (05-14-2015)
  #14  
Old 05-14-2015, 10:29 AM
RawwR's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 187
Received 53 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Go trade in your 435i for the ///M4 if you feel your steering is disconnected. I came from the E92 M3 and feel the 2015 F Type has every bit of steering feedback I need and its probably due to the fact they're both hydraulic steering. Your biggest negative will be the seating capacity and I feel that manual transmissions are over rated.
 
The following users liked this post:
Brutal (05-14-2015)
  #15  
Old 05-14-2015, 11:04 AM
Bret_T's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Georgia
Posts: 289
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Foosh
My view is it's better than any car I've every owned in terms of balancing pure driving pleasure with suitability as a daily-driver. I prefer it by leaps and bounds over any of the 8 BMWs I've owned in the past, including 3 M-cars, from 3 different generations. To boil it down to the simplest way of saying it, there is NO car I've liked more, and I've owned over 50 at this point in my life.
That says a ton right there.



Originally Posted by Schwabe
As much as I love my Jaguars and would not replace them, if you are looking for a light weight sports car feeling of the S2000 this is not it. I would say that I enjoy this car much more than I enjoyed my heavily modfied Cayman turbo with GT3 parts for suspension, clutch and flywheel ...
I'm not looking for another S2000 as I already have one. My previous daily driver was a Subaru WRX. I really liked it even though it drove much differently than the S2000. I learned to live with the less than good looks and cheap interior.

Originally Posted by RawwR
Go trade in your 435i for the ///M4 if you feel your steering is disconnected. I came from the E92 M3 and feel the 2015 F Type has every bit of steering feedback I need and its probably due to the fact they're both hydraulic steering. Your biggest negative will be the seating capacity and I feel that manual transmissions are over rated.
I could buy an M4, but I figure that I should just get the car that I wanted to begin with. I feel I'm more part of the car when I'm driving a manual. Plus, my wife won't want to drive it.
 
  #16  
Old 05-14-2015, 11:32 AM
shift's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,056
Received 580 Likes on 340 Posts
Default

biggest negative...the interior/infotainment/radio/nav/etc. in the F-Type will probably feel like it's from 1980 compared to a BMW. If you value this aspect of the car, it's horrible.
 
  #17  
Old 05-14-2015, 11:53 AM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,028 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shift
biggest negative...the interior/infotainment/radio/nav/etc. in the F-Type will probably feel like it's from 1980 compared to a BMW. If you value this aspect of the car, it's horrible.
The 80's, really? Perhaps, the 00's.

This post is grossly overstated. The interior itself is very nice, although not the very best among luxury makes. I think is MUCH nicer than current BMWs. However, Mercedes has claimed the best title with their new interior designs.

The sound system is NOT horrible when they don't have vibration and rattling issues, which most don't, but too many have. I think it sounds great in my car, but it's not as good as the Burmester in my wife's MB.

The Nav is just OK, but again, not horrible. I don't think any OEM-installed nav systems do as good a job of routing around traffic as the Waze app, so I'd rather have a car without nav anyway.
 

Last edited by Foosh; 05-14-2015 at 12:22 PM.
  #18  
Old 05-14-2015, 12:08 PM
shift's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,056
Received 580 Likes on 340 Posts
Default

The infotainment system is very very very slow. You press something and literally need to wait a second before the next screen. It's like using a very old computer or smart phone. Let me try to do a side by side video comparison of how responsive the Jag's infotainment is compared to a $20K Chevy.
 
  #19  
Old 05-14-2015, 12:12 PM
WhiteTardis's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 969
Received 397 Likes on 210 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bret_T
It's not as good as the S2000, but still pretty decent. I did not realize they were the same. If I get one, I guess I'll have to live with that push forward for reverse thing.
I was a proud owner of an AP1 and AP2. You'll never get the point and shoot handling responses of the s2000 in the F Type..but gotta love the torque!
 
  #20  
Old 05-14-2015, 12:20 PM
Foosh's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 6,177
Received 1,028 Likes on 854 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shift
The infotainment system is very very very slow. You press something and literally need to wait a second before the next screen. It's like using a very old computer or smart phone. Let me try to do a side by side video comparison of how responsive the Jag's infotainment is compared to a $20K Chevy.
You said the 80's. There were no such systems then.
 


Quick Reply: Tell me the negatives about the F-Type



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 PM.