F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

V6S Tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #61  
Old 12-24-2015, 03:25 AM
ss23's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 203
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Can we get any further performance and/or upgrade ideas from the 3.0 v6 SC engines in the Audi S4/S5 (or any other Audi car labelled as having a 3.0"T" engine)?

APR are managing to pull out around 440HP and 375TQ with that engine using a tune and 455HP and 395TQ using a tune and pulley (their engines use the same TVS1320 supercharger).
 
  #62  
Old 12-28-2015, 04:50 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,664 Likes on 3,369 Posts
Default Major Gripe!

Very frustrating: Can anyone share with me why almost all of the pulley vendors refuse to offer actual dimensions on their products? All you can get is: "25 more hp", or "1.7psi more boost", or "increase to 11 psi boost". They make the same claims for the V6 as they do for the V8, even though we know that's impossible.

Thank you VMax for being the exception, as you have been willing to share the proposed diameter increases on the crank pulley. No one else has been forthcoming: ETG, RDE, Mina, Paramount, Eurotoys, etc. Also, none of these folks acknowledge that the V6 upper pulley is already smaller than the V8 pulley.
 
The following users liked this post:
VMaxTuning (12-28-2015)
  #63  
Old 12-28-2015, 08:30 PM
Eurotoys's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 254
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

I think I went over that some of that information with you. I believe our lower pulley kit is 11% larger than the OE pulley, but will confirm next week. I know we only have 1 lower kit fitted to a 3.0 S/C Jaguar, but probably 40-50 have been fitted to 5.0L's. Keep in mind that the lower pulley kits really need to be combined with ECU tuning to achieve full boost.

Here is the dyno sheet provided to us by the shop that fitted our lower pulley kit and tuned the car (their own tuning). However, this does not do me much good since it does not state what the car is on the form.

This shop is located in the UAE and communication with them is challenging. Hard to complain though since we have been dealing with them for a few years now on these.

BTW, I am checking on the requirements for becoming a vendor with the help of JIMC.


Mike
 
Attached Thumbnails V6S Tune-jaguar-3.0l-v6-lower-pulley.jpg  
The following users liked this post:
Unhingd (12-28-2015)
  #64  
Old 01-01-2016, 11:58 AM
Eurotoys's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 254
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
Very frustrating: Can anyone share with me why almost all of the pulley vendors refuse to offer actual dimensions on their products? All you can get is: "25 more hp", or "1.7psi more boost", or "increase to 11 psi boost". They make the same claims for the V6 as they do for the V8, even though we know that's impossible.

Thank you VMax for being the exception, as you have been willing to share the proposed diameter increases on the crank pulley. No one else has been forthcoming: ETG, RDE, Mina, Paramount, Eurotoys, etc. Also, none of these folks acknowledge that the V6 upper pulley is already smaller than the V8 pulley.
PM sent
 
  #65  
Old 01-01-2016, 12:54 PM
Eurotoys's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 254
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Rover kits shown, Jaguar kits similar (lower pulley the same).


Mike
 
Attached Thumbnails V6S Tune-11039084_1112709095422232_1620767787481760121_n-copy.jpg   V6S Tune-11046852_1077556205604188_3131222908373579178_n-copy.jpg  
  #66  
Old 01-01-2016, 01:39 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,664 Likes on 3,369 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eurotoys
PM sent
Response sent.
 
The following users liked this post:
Eurotoys (01-01-2016)
  #67  
Old 01-01-2016, 09:06 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,664 Likes on 3,369 Posts
Default

1 step forwards and 2 steps back. Another difference between the V8 and V6 that nobody has been aware of: The V8 crank pulley may be 1/4" smaller diameter than the V6 in addition to having an upper pulley that is 5/32" larger diameter than the V6. So again, any claims of increases only apply to the V8, not the V6.
 

Last edited by Unhingd; 01-01-2016 at 09:17 PM.
  #68  
Old 01-01-2016, 10:55 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,464 Likes on 2,427 Posts
Default

The bottom pulley is listed as a "crankshaft damper" in the parts catalogue and they are the exact same part for the 5.0L and the 3.0L, p/n AJ811549 and they are also the same on the 5.0L and 3.0L Land Rovers, p/n LR011972, both the Jag and the Land Rover part numbers cross to the engineering p/n 9W83-6316-BA so it's the same on all.
 

Last edited by Cambo; 01-01-2016 at 11:18 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Cambo:
Eurotoys (01-02-2016), VMaxTuning (01-03-2016)
  #69  
Old 01-02-2016, 06:46 AM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,664 Likes on 3,369 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cambo
The bottom pulley is listed as a "crankshaft damper" in the parts catalogue and they are the exact same part for the 5.0L and the 3.0L, p/n AJ811549 and they are also the same on the 5.0L and 3.0L Land Rovers, p/n LR011972, both the Jag and the Land Rover part numbers cross to the engineering p/n 9W83-6316-BA so it's the same on all.
Cambo,
Can you confirm that goes for the 2016 models as well? If you are able to, then it's clear that means we have some options for the V6 (and a few folks I've been talking to don't know how to use a caliper).

Also, if anyone with an R can get it up on a lift to measure their lower pulley diameter, it would be very helpful and greatly appreciated.
 

Last edited by Unhingd; 01-02-2016 at 06:52 AM.
  #70  
Old 01-02-2016, 10:23 AM
Eurotoys's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 254
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
1 step forwards and 2 steps back. Another difference between the V8 and V6 that nobody has been aware of: The V8 crank pulley may be 1/4" smaller diameter than the V6 in addition to having an upper pulley that is 5/32" larger diameter than the V6. So again, any claims of increases only apply to the V8, not the V6.
The Jaguar parts guy told me they have the same part #. I have a feeling that a actual machinist has a more accurate way of measuring the pulley.


Mike
 
  #71  
Old 01-02-2016, 12:33 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,664 Likes on 3,369 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eurotoys
The Jaguar parts guy told me they have the same part #. I have a feeling that a actual machinist has a more accurate way of measuring the pulley.


Mike
Mike,
In the next couple of weeks I will try to get the car up on a lift and will measure that lower pulley with a caliper gauge. It's hard to believe anyone's measurement could be off by a quarter inch, but I guess anything is possible. I hope you are right. Then I'll be back on track again with my tuning project.
 
  #72  
Old 01-02-2016, 12:43 PM
Eurotoys's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 254
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

I will find out from my machinist on what the correct way is to measure. Wrapping a string around the pulley and then measuring it will give you circumference and dividing by pi should tell you the diameter at the base of the grooves.


Again, we looked into this years ago on the 5.0 and then again when the 6 came out. They said it was the same part # for the 6 & 8, so that is far as we looked into it after that.


Mike
 
The following users liked this post:
Unhingd (01-02-2016)
  #73  
Old 01-03-2016, 06:12 PM
VMaxTuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 279
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cambo
The bottom pulley is listed as a "crankshaft damper" in the parts catalogue and they are the exact same part for the 5.0L and the 3.0L, p/n AJ811549 and they are also the same on the 5.0L and 3.0L Land Rovers, p/n LR011972, both the Jag and the Land Rover part numbers cross to the engineering p/n 9W83-6316-BA so it's the same on all.
We checked this with three separate Jag/LR parts dealers.
 
  #74  
Old 01-04-2016, 11:38 AM
Eurotoys's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 254
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
Mike,
In the next couple of weeks I will try to get the car up on a lift and will measure that lower pulley with a caliper gauge. It's hard to believe anyone's measurement could be off by a quarter inch, but I guess anything is possible. I hope you are right. Then I'll be back on track again with my tuning project.
pm sent.
 
The following users liked this post:
Unhingd (01-04-2016)
  #75  
Old 01-04-2016, 01:04 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,664 Likes on 3,369 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eurotoys
pm sent.
OK, back on track!
 
The following users liked this post:
Eurotoys (01-04-2016)
  #76  
Old 01-04-2016, 02:41 PM
VMaxTuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 279
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Unhingd
OK, back on track!
PM sent.

Thanks
Bill
 
  #77  
Old 01-06-2016, 01:03 AM
ss23's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 203
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

So is the consensus that the upper pulley is smaller on the V6 compared to the V8 and that the lower pulley is the same size on both?
 
  #78  
Old 01-06-2016, 07:40 AM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,664 Likes on 3,369 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ss23
So is the consensus that the upper pulley is smaller on the V6 compared to the V8 and that the lower pulley is the same size on both?
Here are the results of my investigations:

OEM V6 upper:62mm
OEM V8 upper: 66mm (exact measurement not confirmed, but certainly close)
Typical aftermarket upper: ~60.5mm (as small as you can go without binding on the SC housing)

OEM (V6 & V8) lower:159mm
 

Last edited by Unhingd; 01-06-2016 at 07:42 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Unhingd:
avos (01-06-2016), ss23 (01-06-2016)
  #79  
Old 01-06-2016, 10:46 AM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,616
Received 1,068 Likes on 761 Posts
Default

Thanks for this update.

This also confirms more or less that the 3.0 cars have the 1320 compressor.

Based on this and a combination of a 20mm larger lower pulley and a 60.5 upper, I would guess the 5.0 cars can come close to 700 hp and the 3.0 close to 460 hp (pending possible other mods as well, it may even go higher)
 
  #80  
Old 01-06-2016, 04:31 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 16,939
Received 4,664 Likes on 3,369 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by avos
Thanks for this update.

This also confirms more or less that the 3.0 cars have the 1320 compressor.

Based on this and a combination of a 20mm larger lower pulley and a 60.5 upper, I would guess the 5.0 cars can come close to 700 hp and the 3.0 close to 460 hp (pending possible other mods as well, it may even go higher)
The Compressor on the F type is an Eaton TVS R1900.
 


Quick Reply: V6S Tune



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 PM.