F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Warning to those without engine covers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-24-2024, 05:50 PM
Luc Lapierre's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 497
Received 223 Likes on 129 Posts
Default Warning to those without engine covers

Like many, I removed my engine cover years ago in order to improve cooling, and because I'd figured it was useless.

However, I recently got told off after getting the cooling system upgraded:







Moving forward I've resolved to replace the engine cover whenever the car will be facing any significant amount of rain!
(Still going to have it off otherwise, however.)
​​​​
Disclaimer: as many may know, Vancouver BC gets a lot of rain. Those in drier climes may not need worry as much.
 

Last edited by Luc Lapierre; 07-24-2024 at 05:52 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by Luc Lapierre:
Don B (07-27-2024), J444G (07-26-2024), uncheel (07-24-2024)
  #2  
Old 07-24-2024, 06:45 PM
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,458
Received 1,001 Likes on 748 Posts
Default

I noticed water in the V when I was removing the symposer and came to the same conclusion that caught you upside the head.

I have mine off for now since we haven't seen rain in months and likely won't for several more, but I've pulled it out of storage.
 
  #3  
Old 07-24-2024, 08:37 PM
sov211's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Victoria, Canada
Posts: 3,695
Received 2,306 Likes on 1,389 Posts
Default

Wait….you drive your F-Type in the rain? You can do that?
 
The following 2 users liked this post by sov211:
bobjagbob (07-26-2024), J444G (07-26-2024)
  #4  
Old 07-25-2024, 03:04 AM
scm's Avatar
scm
scm is online now
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 4,462
Received 1,527 Likes on 1,152 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sov211
Wait….you drive your F-Type in the rain? You can do that?
No choice in the UK! It's surprisingly waterproof.
 
The following users liked this post:
Chris77 (07-25-2024)
  #5  
Old 07-25-2024, 10:13 AM
cpq100's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 561
Received 164 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

In later model years Jaguar added flaps to prevent the water from laying on the engine. I do not know what years and models have the flaps, but my 2018 R Dynamic AWD has them. Being AWD my vents are also farther apart on the hood so it is less of an issue than with a RWD model. A pic of one of the flaps is below.



 
  #6  
Old 07-25-2024, 10:27 AM
Chuckster's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2023
Location: Northern California
Posts: 44
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The same flaps are on my MY 17 SVR
 
  #7  
Old 07-25-2024, 10:48 AM
Thunder Dump's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Western MA
Posts: 694
Received 476 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

The RWD cars are definitely more susceptible to this issue because the vents are larger, further back on the hood, and directly over the plugs/coils on both sides. The 2021+ refresh cars don't have this issue as the vents are much further forward and they have shrouds to channel the water appropriately.
 
  #8  
Old 07-25-2024, 10:53 AM
skizot's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: North Florida
Posts: 461
Received 401 Likes on 179 Posts
Default

This cracks me up and no offense to the shop that worked on these cars, but the engine cover itself does nothing to prevent water intrusion. Maybe some aesthetics and sound reduction, but nothing more. Especially on the RWD models.

The further back vent locations are where the water intrusion comes from. The engine cover does nothing to prevent water from getting everywhere from rain or car washing. Enough time will pass and this will happen, to every single RWD model. AWD models moved the vents further forward to make room for the higher height of the engine position because of the transfer case and was coupled with some additional covers (as shown by CPQ100 above). The SVR models do not even ship from the factory with an engine cover in later model years when they started to be sold in the pre-facelift designed cars.

In my 2016 AWD model, having had the entire top end of the motor apart for coolant pipes, SC coupler, etc, I have no rusted bolts or nuts. I was able to get in there and clean it really well from all the spilled coolant and even coated everything with a rust inhibitor just as a safety precaution in the future. Nevertheless, I laugh at shops who say "put an engine cover on" to prevent this from happening. Just my 2 cents. And yes, opinions are like A$$holes, everyone has one.
 
The following 5 users liked this post by skizot:
CarlB (07-25-2024), jcb-memphis (08-09-2024), Luc Lapierre (07-25-2024), MajorTom (07-25-2024), RGPV6S (07-25-2024)
  #9  
Old 07-25-2024, 01:15 PM
waldo's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 69
Received 46 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

In my limited F-Type experience, the plastic engine cover doesn't buy you much protection from water intrusion. I bought my 2016 F-Type (3.0L, six-speed manual transmission, rear wheel drive) from a gentleman who lived in Washington state. The engine cover was in its factory location when I bought the car.

I am in the process of completing the replacement of the coolant pipes, water pump, and thermostat. With the supercharger off, it was evident that plenty of water had made its way past the engine cover and into the valley of the engine and top of the transmission bell housing. Due to corrosion, I also had to replace six of my valve cover bolts. The six I replaced all looked worse than the middle two in the OP's pictures. Two of the bolts on the passenger side were corroded to the point that the hex-head of the bolt had disintegrated. I was able to use a bolt extractor socket on one bolt. The other was too far gone for the bolt extractor socket and had to be drilled and removed with an Easy Out bolt extractor.

I think a contributing factor to the corrosion of the valve cover bolts are the small heat blankets attached to the underside of the intercooler heat exchangers and sit right above the valve covers. It appears that they retain water and promote corrosion. Both of mine were crusty, and I did not reinstall them with I reinstalled the supercharger.




 
The following 2 users liked this post by waldo:
Luc Lapierre (07-25-2024), mvining (07-25-2024)
  #10  
Old 07-25-2024, 02:01 PM
Luc Lapierre's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 497
Received 223 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cpq100
In later model years Jaguar added flaps to prevent the water from laying on the engine. I do not know what years and models have the flaps, but my 2018 R Dynamic AWD has them. Being AWD my vents are also farther apart on the hood so it is less of an issue than with a RWD model. A pic of one of the flaps is below.



Interesting.

That looks like an easy retrofit, or even something that could be MacGyvered for cheap.

Do you happen to have the part number?
 

Last edited by Luc Lapierre; 07-25-2024 at 02:09 PM.
  #11  
Old 07-25-2024, 02:08 PM
Luc Lapierre's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 497
Received 223 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skizot
This cracks me up and no offense to the shop that worked on these cars, but the engine cover itself does nothing to prevent water intrusion. Maybe some aesthetics and sound reduction, but nothing more. Especially on the RWD models.

The further back vent locations are where the water intrusion comes from. The engine cover does nothing to prevent water from getting everywhere from rain or car washing. Enough time will pass and this will happen, to every single RWD model. AWD models moved the vents further forward to make room for the higher height of the engine position because of the transfer case and was coupled with some additional covers (as shown by CPQ100 above). The SVR models do not even ship from the factory with an engine cover in later model years when they started to be sold in the pre-facelift designed cars.

In my 2016 AWD model, having had the entire top end of the motor apart for coolant pipes, SC coupler, etc, I have no rusted bolts or nuts. I was able to get in there and clean it really well from all the spilled coolant and even coated everything with a rust inhibitor just as a safety precaution in the future. Nevertheless, I laugh at shops who say "put an engine cover on" to prevent this from happening. Just my 2 cents. And yes, opinions are like A$$holes, everyone has one.

To be fair, I'd much rather hear "nah, leave your engine cover off bud!".
​​​​​

I can understand the shop concluding "Aha, that is what the engine cover must be for". Remember that not everyone is an F Type nerd like we are 🤓 (I did see some really cool cars there though, both modern and classic. A good sign, I figure.)

Guess I'll be looking into alternative solutions 🤔
 
  #12  
Old 07-25-2024, 03:32 PM
CarlB's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 66
Received 25 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

^Anti-seize if worried.
 
  #13  
Old 07-25-2024, 05:16 PM
MajorTom's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Location: Luxembourg
Posts: 383
Received 142 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

From what I've seen the engine cover does divert some water on RWD F-Types, especially if the cover has been modded with additional flaps on the sides and especially on RWD F-Types with the open mesh vents that cars without the black pack come with.

My approach has always been - if the car will be subjected to any larger amounts of water like heavy rain or washing: engine cover on. Otherwise my engine cover is always off and when not driven the car lives in a humidity controlled garage.

If the car is driven while or after water seeps in I guess most of the water evaporates due to the heat. The worst is probably to leave the car standing out in rain and constant humidity. Anyways IMHO an F-Type is way too nice not to be garaged although ironically most owners in its rainy country of origin don't seem to have a garage.
 
The following users liked this post:
Luc Lapierre (07-25-2024)
  #14  
Old 07-25-2024, 05:28 PM
Luc Lapierre's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 497
Received 223 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Mine has been garage-kept for the past four and a half years, but I did have an 8-month "transitional period" (i.e. breakup, sorry if TMI &#128513 in my life before then, when the car had to be kept outside. And, as I mentioned, we can get lots of rain around here.

So maybe most of the damage was done in that period.

​​​​​
 

Last edited by Luc Lapierre; 07-25-2024 at 05:30 PM.
  #15  
Old 07-25-2024, 07:03 PM
BritCars's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Boston, MA USA
Posts: 2,437
Received 447 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

Note that the SVR doesn't have an engine cover to start with. So I guess the Jag engineers thought that was ok...
 
  #16  
Old 07-26-2024, 10:54 AM
lizzardo's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,458
Received 1,001 Likes on 748 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BritCars
Note that the SVR doesn't have an engine cover to start with. So I guess the Jag engineers thought that was ok...
AWD has the hood vents placed differently than RWD. The RWD vents do allow water entry that can go to the engine valley if the cover is missing.
 
  #17  
Old 07-27-2024, 05:06 AM
Kuhli's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: Berlin
Posts: 15
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Luc Lapierre
Interesting.

That looks like an easy retrofit, or even something that could be MacGyvered for cheap.

Do you happen to have the part number?



Hello,
the numbers for the covers with the water drain are,
  • GX53-02020-AA
  • GX53-02021-AA
On the V6, however, the vents are in a different location because we don't let the water hit the cover and drain it away
Greetings Frank
 

Last edited by Kuhli; 07-27-2024 at 05:12 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Valerie Stabenow (07-27-2024)
  #18  
Old 07-27-2024, 05:20 AM
scm's Avatar
scm
scm is online now
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southampton, UK
Posts: 4,462
Received 1,527 Likes on 1,152 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kuhli
On the V6, however, the vents are in a different location ...
Are you sure that's not an AWD vs RWD thing rather than a V6 thing?
 
  #19  
Old 07-27-2024, 05:28 AM
OzXFR's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 8,536
Received 3,274 Likes on 2,416 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scm
Are you sure that's not an AWD vs RWD thing rather than a V6 thing?
Yep, the bonnet/hood vent placement is purely about AWD vs RWD and has SFA to do with V6 vs V8.
 
The following users liked this post:
jcb-memphis (08-09-2024)
  #20  
Old 07-27-2024, 06:00 AM
Robtrt8's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Nellyville
Posts: 576
Received 136 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

I had to refer to Urban Dictionary for SFA. I figured out FA all by myself but SFA just isn’t common here.

Motor cover and NVH foam pads removed. The pads didn’t make it back on the car after spark plug replacement. In fact all my car’s motors are naked.

Dealership’s tech called it out on my Pace S but didn’t mention why. Course this is the same guy that wanted to charge me 2 hours and an oil change to replace the gasket on the vacuum pump. The time is ridiculous as it takes 5 minutes to remove the pump. Replacing the gasket is ridiculous because the pumps warp and can’t be resealed. The oil change is ridiculous because you loose SFA oil upon pump removal (if you’re using ramps). Hardest part was finding a 12nm torque wrench.
 


Quick Reply: Warning to those without engine covers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 AM.