What else is like the F type?
#21
#22
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ive been thinking about what car I really own here. I was a Porsche guy for years and this car does not handle as well but is a hoot in many other capacities.
I was thinking that its actually quite similar to the sl63 at a considerably lower price point and with subtly better cornering. The sl seemed much heavier and ponderous on track. Both share a quieter gt-ish feel around town (never had that feel in the Carrera) but nothing comes close to the aural appeal of the ftype. Im also abig fan of torque. I was mixing it up a bit with an s4 this am and when we reached a light the driver put down his window and said "nice- that cars got a lot of *****"
I was thinking that its actually quite similar to the sl63 at a considerably lower price point and with subtly better cornering. The sl seemed much heavier and ponderous on track. Both share a quieter gt-ish feel around town (never had that feel in the Carrera) but nothing comes close to the aural appeal of the ftype. Im also abig fan of torque. I was mixing it up a bit with an s4 this am and when we reached a light the driver put down his window and said "nice- that cars got a lot of *****"
![Smile](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I'm ordering 2016 in October.
2015 Aston Martin V8 Vantage GT: The Jalopnik Review
#23
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here is a great option. It's a priced bit higher, but has a proper manual 6 speed, amazing sound track and as for looks, well it wins hands down.
I'm ordering 2016 in October.
2015 Aston Martin V8 Vantage GT: The Jalopnik Review
![Smile](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I'm ordering 2016 in October.
2015 Aston Martin V8 Vantage GT: The Jalopnik Review
#24
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It depends on what you're interested in. The Vantage V8 GT is nice, but it doesn't really compete in the same class as the FTR, in my opinion. The Vantage is more of a GT car where the F-Type is more of a sports car. Honestly I prefer the look of the F-Type as well. But then again everyone has their own preferences.
I'm not a track guy, so none of this matters. This for me will be a pampered garage queen. Taken out on weekends and special occasion.
I love the FTR and really wanted to get on, and still might.
I know looks are subjective and both cars are beautiful. But as for the Aston, it'd a timeless design that looks as beautiful and modern as any car out there. And better. Yu
#25
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here is a great option. It's a priced bit higher, but has a proper manual 6 speed, amazing sound track and as for looks, well it wins hands down.
I'm ordering 2016 in October.
2015 Aston Martin V8 Vantage GT: The Jalopnik Review
![Smile](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I'm ordering 2016 in October.
2015 Aston Martin V8 Vantage GT: The Jalopnik Review
#26
#27
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That's were we disagree. I've researched them a lot, and the only thing the FTR has over the V8 GT is brute power, and I know that makes up for a lot of sins. If they were more evenly matched the GT would shine over the R. Aston has over the years refined the chassis, steering and handling and created a basically bullet proof care. The exhaust note of the Vantage is pure and not artificially enhanced like the R. Don't get me wrong I love the sounds of the a Jaguar.
I'm not a track guy, so none of this matters. This for me will be a pampered garage queen. Taken out on weekends and special occasion.
I love the FTR and really wanted to get on, and still might.
I know looks are subjective and both cars are beautiful. But as for the Aston, it'd a timeless design that looks as beautiful and modern as any car out there. And better. Yu
I'm not a track guy, so none of this matters. This for me will be a pampered garage queen. Taken out on weekends and special occasion.
I love the FTR and really wanted to get on, and still might.
I know looks are subjective and both cars are beautiful. But as for the Aston, it'd a timeless design that looks as beautiful and modern as any car out there. And better. Yu
Maybe with a complete refresh including an all new modern interior, new instrumentation, and a higher power engine it could be the best in class, but to me the outgoing generation isn't quite there. If the F-Type didn't exist I might have considered it, mainly because the Vantage is also beautiful. But more than likely I'd have gone with a 911 Carrera 4S or Boxster GTS over the Vantage.
But that is just me. What is important to me in a car is probably not the same as what you or anyone else is looking for.
#28
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Enumclaw, Washington U.S.A.
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 104 Likes
on
79 Posts
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was cross shopping the V8 vantage and it was very short on features compared to the F-Type. Starting with no keyless entry, to no keyless go, to the dated infotainment, then the engine was basically the prior generation jag engine.
What really sold me was the Aston forum. They report a lot of issues I would not expect at that price point. Like failing finishes on interior parts, persistent squeaks and rattles, oil leaks etc. The car has lots of screws to tighten which is cool if you prefer screws to clips but not cool if you can't easily reach the screws.
What really sold me was the Aston forum. They report a lot of issues I would not expect at that price point. Like failing finishes on interior parts, persistent squeaks and rattles, oil leaks etc. The car has lots of screws to tighten which is cool if you prefer screws to clips but not cool if you can't easily reach the screws.
#29
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I was cross shopping the V8 vantage and it was very short on features compared to the F-Type. Starting with no keyless entry, to no keyless go, to the dated infotainment, then the engine was basically the prior generation jag engine.
What really sold me was the Aston forum. They report a lot of issues I would not expect at that price point. Like failing finishes on interior parts, persistent squeaks and rattles, oil leaks etc. The car has lots of screws to tighten which is cool if you prefer screws to clips but not cool if you can't easily reach the screws.
What really sold me was the Aston forum. They report a lot of issues I would not expect at that price point. Like failing finishes on interior parts, persistent squeaks and rattles, oil leaks etc. The car has lots of screws to tighten which is cool if you prefer screws to clips but not cool if you can't easily reach the screws.
The only piece of the engine shared with the AJV8 is the block casting, everything else is Aston Martin designed. And Jaguar V8 is still the AJV8, their V6's are Ford based engines. Each Aston engine is hand assembled by one technician at Aston's factory inside the Ford engine plant in Germany. I believe Jaguars are built on an assembly line
First I have heard of having to tighten screws, silliest thing I have ever heard. I could care less about the "infotainment", but each to his own there.
The Jaguar is a beautiful car, and I like them a lot. But I don't take my car to the track, it won't be a daily driver and 0 to 60 times really don't mean a thing since I won't be drag racing high school kids at the stop lights.
![Smile](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KarimPA
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
11
09-12-2015 08:15 AM
KarimPA
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
8
09-03-2015 07:32 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)