What you DON'T LIKE about your F Type
#82
Mentally you do, physically you don't.
The worst thing about my F-Type - in it's current state - is how absolutely dirty it is from driving it. No, Lance, I am not trying in any way to make you feel bad (you know me better than that), merely stating a fact. A rather meaningless fact but a fact nevertheless.
The worst thing about my F-Type - in it's current state - is how absolutely dirty it is from driving it. No, Lance, I am not trying in any way to make you feel bad (you know me better than that), merely stating a fact. A rather meaningless fact but a fact nevertheless.
#83
Ninja edit: I'm always ready to fight for human rights, particularly the right to complain. My complaint is this whistling noise on the highway when the top is down. It comes from the passenger side, but there is no passenger. I was not told my car came with an annoying single-tune ghost.
Last edited by hardwired; 03-10-2015 at 03:09 PM.
#84
#85
Wish there was one in my XFR as well. Sunglasses have to go in the door side pocket.
Last edited by 2010 Kyanite XFR; 03-10-2015 at 11:35 PM.
#86
I don't see many vapor recovery nozzles any more (in VA at least) - didn't the EPA do away with them?
Anyhow - auto pump shut off is controlled by a small tube in the nozzle that turns off the pump when the hole in the end of this tube is blocked by gas (air pressure effect), which happens when the tank is full. If it happens at other times, gas must be backing up in the filler tube. I can only think of 2 reasons for this - a) the design of the car has a kink or bend in the tube that leads to the gas tank (or the tube is too narrow) and gas can't flow quickly enough into the tank or b) air can't escape from the tank quickly enough when gas is flowing in and 'bubbles' it back up (for whatever reason - a vapor recovery 'boot' that fits completely over the opening could certainly slow the flow of air leaving).
Nozzle design (length?) could also be a factor.
Solution would be to pump slowly, giving the gas time to flow into the tank (and air out of the tank) and not letting it back up and activate the auto shutoff feature.
I guess....
Anyhow - auto pump shut off is controlled by a small tube in the nozzle that turns off the pump when the hole in the end of this tube is blocked by gas (air pressure effect), which happens when the tank is full. If it happens at other times, gas must be backing up in the filler tube. I can only think of 2 reasons for this - a) the design of the car has a kink or bend in the tube that leads to the gas tank (or the tube is too narrow) and gas can't flow quickly enough into the tank or b) air can't escape from the tank quickly enough when gas is flowing in and 'bubbles' it back up (for whatever reason - a vapor recovery 'boot' that fits completely over the opening could certainly slow the flow of air leaving).
Nozzle design (length?) could also be a factor.
Solution would be to pump slowly, giving the gas time to flow into the tank (and air out of the tank) and not letting it back up and activate the auto shutoff feature.
I guess....
Tar,
That has been reported by a fair number of people in this forum. The majority of those reports have come from CA.
While we have vapor recovery nozzles (for environmental reasons) in my state as well, but I've never once had a pump shut down prematurely in over 6K miles. The design of these nozzles varies from place to place, and some of these designs appear to be more prone to that problem.
That has been reported by a fair number of people in this forum. The majority of those reports have come from CA.
While we have vapor recovery nozzles (for environmental reasons) in my state as well, but I've never once had a pump shut down prematurely in over 6K miles. The design of these nozzles varies from place to place, and some of these designs appear to be more prone to that problem.
#87
#88
isn't the little storage are between the seats at shoulder height ok for storing sunglasses in the coupe? That has worked for me.
As far as what bothers me about my vehicle, I wish the shift lever would engage drive just by pulling it rearwards from reverse, without having to depress the shift bar again.
As far as what bothers me about my vehicle, I wish the shift lever would engage drive just by pulling it rearwards from reverse, without having to depress the shift bar again.
The following 2 users liked this post by gotwish:
Foosh (03-11-2015),
knoxville379 (03-14-2015)
#89
What I don't like.. For me, these are relative dislikes.. i.e. they aren't horrible, but IMO they should be better for a brand with a name/history like Jaguar:
1. Stereo
2. Base features (there are a lot of addons which should just be standard for brand like Jaguar)
3. Lack of user specific programming (i.e. why can't I program the car to aways have active exhaust on and ECO mode off, I'm the customer and the customer is always right )
That being said, they are relative dislikes as I love the car.
1. Stereo
2. Base features (there are a lot of addons which should just be standard for brand like Jaguar)
3. Lack of user specific programming (i.e. why can't I program the car to aways have active exhaust on and ECO mode off, I'm the customer and the customer is always right )
That being said, they are relative dislikes as I love the car.
#90
I don't think that would be a very good idea. Given the central location of the shift handle around so many other switches and controls, that would cause some to accidentally knock it out of gear. The trigger is a good idea and ensures you really meant to put it forward, neutral or reverse.
#91
Vision Pack Cost Too High
The reality for me is that the lack of visibility is probably the thing I dislike the most about this car, and this vision pack should not even be considered an option - I'd go as far as to say it's a safety issue. The fact that Jaguar would capitalize on this obvious shortcoming of this car, left a very bad taste in my mouth.
#92
I don't think that would be a very good idea. Given the central location of the shift handle around so many other switches and controls, that would cause some to accidentally knock it out of gear. The trigger is a good idea and ensures you really meant to put it forward, neutral or reverse.
#93
The reality for me is that the lack of visibility is probably the thing I dislike the most about this car, and this vision pack should not even be considered an option - I'd go as far as to say it's a safety issue. The fact that Jaguar would capitalize on this obvious shortcoming of this car, left a very bad taste in my mouth.
#94
#96
Going to get a lot of crap for this...but I actually like the limited visibility. It's part of the design, makes me feel like I'm strapped into a jet fighter seat. When I went from a Cayman to a 911, the first thing I missed was the 2-seater, confined atmosphere of the cabin. The 911 was too spacious behind me. Sure, great visibility and can carry more stuff. But I wanted that purposeful cabin feeling. So I'm very happy that the F-Type has that same tight, confined, this is not a grocery-getter feeling cabin.
#97
If the sun visors were any bigger, I wouldn't be able to see out of the windshield, while using them. They are perfect for my height at 6'2". There's an obvious reason that is a necessity given the body and windshield dimensions and shapes, unless you are really, really short.
#98
I don't think that would be a very good idea. Given the central location of the shift handle around so many other switches and controls, that would cause some to accidentally knock it out of gear. The trigger is a good idea and ensures you really meant to put it forward, neutral or reverse.
#99
It does go into N from either F or R if you try it without holding the trigger, and a warning flashes on the gauge display telling me to hold down the trigger.
EDIT: I remember well that I was rather embarrassed when taking delivery, and I sat for a couple of minutes while my saleslady watched me trying to put it into gear. Then I remembered the trigger, smiled and waved goodbye.
Last edited by Foosh; 03-13-2015 at 06:37 PM.