View Poll Results: Would you purchase?
Yes
![](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/kirsch/polls/bar2-l.gif)
![](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/kirsch/polls/bar2.gif)
![](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/kirsch/polls/bar2-r.gif)
![](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/clear.gif)
1
5.56%
No
![](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/kirsch/polls/bar3-l.gif)
![](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/kirsch/polls/bar3.gif)
![](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/kirsch/polls/bar3-r.gif)
![](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/clear.gif)
17
94.44%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll
Would you purchase this 16R? "Structural Damage" on Carfax
#1
![Question](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/icons/icon5.gif)
Looking at a used 2016 R with 12k miles but with "structural" damage for 50995 with factory warranty running till July 2021
Damage reported on Carfax is due to rear end collision
https://www.carfax.com/VehicleHistor...WJ6DLXGMK34228
Dealer notes below:
"Please note that when this vehicle was returned to Chase Financial at the end of the lease it was inspected and determined to have had a previous repair to the trunk floor (the area located in the trunk beneath the carpet). Although this was extremely minor and inconsequential with regard to functionality, this repair to the trunk floor is considered structural in nature due to its location as a welded component of the vehicle."
Would any of you have a problem with this vehicle?
Similar vehicles without this on the carfax would run about 10k+ more in my area.
Dealer seems to have very good reviews online as well, so i'm more inclined to believe them at this point in time.
Can anyone talk me out or into this?
Damage reported on Carfax is due to rear end collision
https://www.carfax.com/VehicleHistor...WJ6DLXGMK34228
Dealer notes below:
"Please note that when this vehicle was returned to Chase Financial at the end of the lease it was inspected and determined to have had a previous repair to the trunk floor (the area located in the trunk beneath the carpet). Although this was extremely minor and inconsequential with regard to functionality, this repair to the trunk floor is considered structural in nature due to its location as a welded component of the vehicle."
Would any of you have a problem with this vehicle?
Similar vehicles without this on the carfax would run about 10k+ more in my area.
Dealer seems to have very good reviews online as well, so i'm more inclined to believe them at this point in time.
Can anyone talk me out or into this?
#3
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dealer notes are BS, this is NOT minor. Structural damage is by very definition of a big deal. At the very least take it for independent inspection to determine if it is even road-worthy/would pass safety.
This car should be treated as a salvage title and is likely ineligible for warranty coverage or CPO. 51K for that is LOL. Plus, they already were compensated by PO's insurance for diminished value, so they have a lot of room for discounting. Also, you will never be able to sell this car without 50%+ discounting with something like that noted in the CarFax, so factor that into cost of ownership.
With expensive cars like F-type, a lot of unscrupulous body shops would repair issues that should result in a write-off. You will have potential issues with alignment, panel fitment, drive shaft and CV joints going bad, rattles while driving, water getting in, and last but not least - with the car being unable to absorb impact (i.e. unsafe) in case of another rear end accident.
This car should be treated as a salvage title and is likely ineligible for warranty coverage or CPO. 51K for that is LOL. Plus, they already were compensated by PO's insurance for diminished value, so they have a lot of room for discounting. Also, you will never be able to sell this car without 50%+ discounting with something like that noted in the CarFax, so factor that into cost of ownership.
With expensive cars like F-type, a lot of unscrupulous body shops would repair issues that should result in a write-off. You will have potential issues with alignment, panel fitment, drive shaft and CV joints going bad, rattles while driving, water getting in, and last but not least - with the car being unable to absorb impact (i.e. unsafe) in case of another rear end accident.
Last edited by SinF; 10-03-2019 at 08:51 AM.
#4
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dealer notes are BS, this is NOT minor. This car should be treated as a salvage title and is likely ineligible for warranty coverage or CPO. 51K for that is LOL. Plus, they already were compensated by PO's insurance for diminished value, so they have a lot of room for discounting.
#5
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dealer notes are BS, this is NOT minor. Structural damage is by very definition of a big deal. At the very least take it for independent inspection to determine if it is even road-worthy/would pass safety.
This car should be treated as a salvage title and is likely ineligible for warranty coverage or CPO. 51K for that is LOL. Plus, they already were compensated by PO's insurance for diminished value, so they have a lot of room for discounting. Also, you will never be able to sell this car without 50%+ discounting with something like that noted in the CarFax, so factor that into cost of ownership.
With expensive cars like F-type, a lot of unscrupulous body shops would repair issues that should result in a write-off. You will have potential issues with alignment, panel fitment, drive shaft and CV joints going bad, rattles while driving, water getting in, and last but not least - with the car being unable to absorb impact (i.e. unsafe) in case of another rear end accident.
This car should be treated as a salvage title and is likely ineligible for warranty coverage or CPO. 51K for that is LOL. Plus, they already were compensated by PO's insurance for diminished value, so they have a lot of room for discounting. Also, you will never be able to sell this car without 50%+ discounting with something like that noted in the CarFax, so factor that into cost of ownership.
With expensive cars like F-type, a lot of unscrupulous body shops would repair issues that should result in a write-off. You will have potential issues with alignment, panel fitment, drive shaft and CV joints going bad, rattles while driving, water getting in, and last but not least - with the car being unable to absorb impact (i.e. unsafe) in case of another rear end accident.
![Icon That](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_that.gif)
What are we looking at? Is that a plate that’s simply been welded into the bottom of the boot?
#6
#7
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've seen this type of thing go either way - its possible that it truly is minor damage, or it may have been pretty badly damaged. If you really are into this vehicle, at least get it inspected by a 3rd party - one with the ability to measure paint thickness (can determine which panels have been repainted), etc.
As others have mentioned, even if it is minor damage, when you go to sell you will have a much harder time doing so - so I'd want a bigger discount now. What is low wholesale book on this car? I'd refuse to pay more than that even after confirming damage was minor.
As others have mentioned, even if it is minor damage, when you go to sell you will have a much harder time doing so - so I'd want a bigger discount now. What is low wholesale book on this car? I'd refuse to pay more than that even after confirming damage was minor.
Trending Topics
#8
#9
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm not scared by previous Damage, As long as I can see what was damaged, and what else is affected. From the pic I see. I don't see a damn thing that would make me believe they are being straight up about things. Tell them lots more "Good Pictures" that actually show the damaged, or repaired area. Otherwise walk away. If i can access it myself Ok, if not??? Pass. Just my thoughts
Jack
Jack
The following users liked this post:
peppersam740 (10-04-2019)
#10
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm not scared by previous Damage, As long as I can see what was damaged, and what else is affected. From the pic I see. I don't see a damn thing that would make me believe they are being straight up about things. Tell them lots more "Good Pictures" that actually show the damaged, or repaired area. Otherwise walk away. If i can access it myself Ok, if not??? Pass. Just my thoughts
Jack
Jack
The following users liked this post:
89 Jacobra (10-04-2019)
#12
The following 2 users liked this post by joshx9:
89 Jacobra (10-07-2019),
jaguny (10-07-2019)
#14
#15
#16
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dealer notes are BS, this is NOT minor. Structural damage is by very definition of a big deal. At the very least take it for independent inspection to determine if it is even road-worthy/would pass safety.
This car should be treated as a salvage title and is likely ineligible for warranty coverage or CPO. 51K for that is LOL. Plus, they already were compensated by PO's insurance for diminished value, so they have a lot of room for discounting. Also, you will never be able to sell this car without 50%+ discounting with something like that noted in the CarFax, so factor that into cost of ownership.
With expensive cars like F-type, a lot of unscrupulous body shops would repair issues that should result in a write-off. You will have potential issues with alignment, panel fitment, drive shaft and CV joints going bad, rattles while driving, water getting in, and last but not least - with the car being unable to absorb impact (i.e. unsafe) in case of another rear end accident.
This car should be treated as a salvage title and is likely ineligible for warranty coverage or CPO. 51K for that is LOL. Plus, they already were compensated by PO's insurance for diminished value, so they have a lot of room for discounting. Also, you will never be able to sell this car without 50%+ discounting with something like that noted in the CarFax, so factor that into cost of ownership.
With expensive cars like F-type, a lot of unscrupulous body shops would repair issues that should result in a write-off. You will have potential issues with alignment, panel fitment, drive shaft and CV joints going bad, rattles while driving, water getting in, and last but not least - with the car being unable to absorb impact (i.e. unsafe) in case of another rear end accident.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
andre.iamma
XF and XFR ( X250 )
9
05-21-2019 12:07 PM
bizspeed
US Lower Atlantic
0
08-04-2015 10:56 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)