F-Type ( X152 ) 2014 - Onwards
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Yikes! 4 cylinder F-Type for $75K...?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-26-2019 | 08:36 PM
NavyBlue's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 511
Likes: 131
From: Houston TX
Default Yikes! 4 cylinder F-Type for $75K...?

Was waiting around dealership while my R was getting free annual service.
Saw a new 4 cylinder F-type that stickers over $75K!!!
Wow, the reason I got my F-type R convertible is for the 550 hp engine, to hold me over in between previous 460 hp C7 Corvette & next gen C8 mid-engine Z06 Vette, hopefully still around 650 hp.
I understand not everyone needs all this horsepower, but interesting to see the dealer's ad on the new F-type:
"...Under the hood you'll find a 4 cylinder engine with more than 200 horsepower,..."
 
  #2  
Old 02-26-2019 | 10:20 PM
jaguny's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,307
Likes: 628
From: upstate new york
Default

criminal really...
 
  #3  
Old 02-27-2019 | 07:17 AM
SinF's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 6,987
Likes: 2,142
From: Canada, eh
Default

It takes a buyer and a seller for asking price to transform into sale price.
 
  #4  
Old 02-27-2019 | 11:07 AM
Chawumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 800
Likes: 241
From: So Cal
Default

I think the 4 cylinder F type is pure genius and should be considered the top of the line (and priced accordingly). Those of you with V-6 models clearly don't respect the planet, and let's face it, you can't really use all that power on the street anyways. Besides, with the lighter weight, even the most experienced drivers struggle to explore the true limits of the 4 cylinder F type, at least on public roads. Anything else is just wretched excess and should be banned.
 

Last edited by Chawumba; 02-27-2019 at 11:10 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by Chawumba:
DJS (02-27-2019), powerhouse (02-27-2019)
  #5  
Old 02-27-2019 | 11:56 AM
fujicoupe's Avatar
Banned
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 425
From: South Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by Chawumba
I think the 4 cylinder F type is pure genius and should be considered the top of the line (and priced accordingly). Those of you with V-6 models clearly don't respect the planet, and let's face it, you can't really use all that power on the street anyways. Besides, with the lighter weight, even the most experienced drivers struggle to explore the true limits of the 4 cylinder F type, at least on public roads. Anything else is just wretched excess and should be banned.
You left off the /sarc/ designation. Some progressives may actually take your comment seriously--yikes!
 
  #6  
Old 02-27-2019 | 12:00 PM
CleverName's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 875
From: Pacific Northwest
Default

Wow....
Kinda sad considering that is the same output as my stock 2.0L turbo Galant from 1991. (And my old 2006 Audi A4 with its 2.0 turbo.)
Unlike the Galant or Audi, I suspect there will be little to no aftermarket goodies to pump it up like the two I mentioned. The Mitsu 2.0 has been pushed into the 9 second range and somewhere near 500-600HP. The Audi 2.0 is easily taken to 350HP.

The lighter and smaller engine can be a real benefit in handling, but without a supporting market for increasing power, this poor F-Type will just be a good looking grocery getter, or something to buy the misses for Christmas.
 
  #7  
Old 02-27-2019 | 12:08 PM
NavyBlue's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 511
Likes: 131
From: Houston TX
Default

Originally Posted by Chawumba
I think the 4 cylinder F type is pure genius and should be considered the top of the line (and priced accordingly). Those of you with V-6 models clearly don't respect the planet, and let's face it, you can't really use all that power on the street anyways. Besides, with the lighter weight, even the most experienced drivers struggle to explore the true limits of the 4 cylinder F type, at least on public roads. Anything else is just wretched excess and should be banned.
Agreed.
All the geniuses in the world should only allowed to buy 4-cylinder Nissan Versa, now priced at $9,900.
Take the leftover $65K & buy carbon credits for the rest of us....
 
  #8  
Old 02-27-2019 | 01:46 PM
DJS's Avatar
DJS
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 6,388
Likes: 2,170
From: Metrowest Boston
Default

Did the ad really say 'more than 200HP'? Should have said 'close to 300HP' - I think 296HP is Jag's number?
 
The following users liked this post:
CleverName (02-27-2019)
  #9  
Old 02-27-2019 | 04:29 PM
powerhouse's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 594
From: Ireland
Default

Have my 4 pot now for a year and love the car, can't say a bad thing about it, I have had several xk versions and before the F-type I had a 520bhp XKR , with ever tweek going, do I miss the power , well no, can't use it anyway, it doesn't bother me in the slightest, it has 300 brake, plenty of power, it has the look, inside and out. Was out today and had it parked up in a few places, loads of people looking at it and the usual pictures, not one person asked what engine it was, for me it looks the part and drives as good as any f-type, the most thing I enjoy is just cruising along and letting people just pass me by, you can see the smiles as they look at the car passing and the head turns, for people that like big engines go for the bigger variant, simple.
Great move by Jag with this car and suits the like of my country with high emission tax.


 
The following users liked this post:
sharx8 (02-28-2019)
  #10  
Old 02-27-2019 | 04:45 PM
CleverName's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,453
Likes: 875
From: Pacific Northwest
Default

Originally Posted by DJS
Did the ad really say 'more than 200HP'? Should have said 'close to 300HP' - I think 296HP is Jag's number?
Ahhhh. That would make my comment much less relevant. (Apologies powerhouse )

Also have my XKR, and agree that 510HP is really too much for the aggressive driving I do. (Fun? Yes. Easy to handle on tight twisty roads? No.) I've been told I'm faster in my XK as I rely less on brute force, and more on precision.

Still.... gotta love the fact my first gen Mitsu 2.0L remains coveted even today for its shocking potential and reliability.
 
  #11  
Old 02-27-2019 | 06:42 PM
uncheel's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 635
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

I hated that JLR cheapened the product line with the 4-banger. I'd personally rather get a year-old V-6S and have money left over to over some mod's.
In fact, that's just what I did.

But, in fairness, the car is a beauty, regardless of what's under the hood. Not everyone prioritizes performance, and, even in my case, I was happy to compromise vs the V8. So, I guess it's a matter of taste.
 
  #12  
Old 02-28-2019 | 04:17 AM
scm's Avatar
scm
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 1,530
From: Southampton, UK
Default

Originally Posted by CleverName
Also have my XKR, and agree that 510HP is really too much for the aggressive driving I do. (Fun? Yes. Easy to handle on tight twisty roads? No.) I've been told I'm faster in my XK as I rely less on brute force, and more on precision.
I've found that my R AWD F-type far more planted and easier to handle on twisty roads than my previous 2010 XKR.
 
The following users liked this post:
CleverName (02-28-2019)
  #13  
Old 02-28-2019 | 10:16 AM
vika01's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 244
Likes: 71
From: Sweden
Default

NEVER buy a brand new Jag. After 3 years they are 50% off. Especially never a super overpriced 2 litre.
 
  #14  
Old 02-28-2019 | 11:04 AM
caviarjag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 335
Likes: 55
From: Westchester
Default

Agreed that is way too much, especially since that is more than I paid for my new 6 speed v6 convertible. That said, all the complaints about jaguar making the car more mass market are misplaced. They don’t exactly move a lot of these cars. Given the choice between some more mass market versions of the car and no f type at all, I know which I would take. Jaguar will pull the plug, as should any business, if they can’t make money.
 
  #15  
Old 02-28-2019 | 11:31 AM
scm's Avatar
scm
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 1,530
From: Southampton, UK
Default

Originally Posted by vika01
NEVER buy a brand new Jag.
Bad advice - if no-one buys them brand new, the 3 year-old supply dries up.
 
The following users liked this post:
Ron Gillespie (02-28-2019)
  #16  
Old 02-28-2019 | 11:41 AM
DJS's Avatar
DJS
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 6,388
Likes: 2,170
From: Metrowest Boston
Default

Originally Posted by vika01
NEVER buy a brand new Jag. After 3 years they are 50% off.
That's a bit like Yogi Berra's "No one goes there anymore, it's too crowded." There's a supply of 3-year old F-types because someone (like me) bought one new. No regrets in my case.



 
The following 3 users liked this post by DJS:
fujicoupe (02-28-2019), JgaXkr (03-02-2019), Ron Gillespie (02-28-2019)
  #17  
Old 02-28-2019 | 12:25 PM
Uncle Fishbits's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 714
From: Tiburon, CA
Default

Originally Posted by NavyBlue
Was waiting around dealership while my R was getting free annual service.
Saw a new 4 cylinder F-type that stickers over $75K!!!
Wow, the reason I got my F-type R convertible is for the 550 hp engine, to hold me over in between previous 460 hp C7 Corvette & next gen C8 mid-engine Z06 Vette, hopefully still around 650 hp.
I understand not everyone needs all this horsepower, but interesting to see the dealer's ad on the new F-type:
"...Under the hood you'll find a 4 cylinder engine with more than 200 horsepower,..."
Does production of a 4 banger help their overall emissions targets? Are they delivering something that that is aspirational to the Festiva and Focus rally crowd, or is it just working within the confines of new regulations, sorta like the easily disabled start/stop that no one wanted?

Regardless of those answers, the base price of a 4 cyclinder vs the earlier base of 6cyl simply means their marketing folks and their biz folk seriously got the entry level pricing on the 4 completely wrong, especially if it's meant to be that tiny-slight-aspirational reach for Ken Block admirers. And base price is not outfitted price, so the idea a 4 cylinder could go over $60K is just absurd.

I started looking for the most expensive 4-cyl, but that's a rabbit hole I don't have time for.
 
  #18  
Old 02-28-2019 | 12:28 PM
Brava's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 68
Likes: 9
Default

well, this is a very beautiful car, so no matter what engine you have under the bonnet, it will turn heads.

however, you can buy a 3 cylinder car from bmw for 150k 😀
 
  #19  
Old 02-28-2019 | 02:31 PM
Unhingd's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,939
Likes: 4,664
From: Maryland, US
Default

Originally Posted by vika01
NEVER buy a brand new Jag. After 3 years they are 50% off. Especially never a super overpriced 2 litre.
Ok to buy brand new if you plan on keeping it. But $75k is not the right price to buy the 2.0
 

Last edited by Unhingd; 02-28-2019 at 02:40 PM.
  #20  
Old 02-28-2019 | 02:38 PM
sov211's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 2,317
From: Victoria, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by scm
Bad advice - if no-one buys them brand new, the 3 year-old supply dries up.
Absolutely correct!
 
The following users liked this post:
fujicoupe (02-28-2019)


Quick Reply: Yikes! 4 cylinder F-Type for $75K...?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.