MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler 1955 - 1967

62, 3.8, engine and trans removal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-12-2024, 10:57 AM
farina43537's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Maumee, Ohio
Posts: 35
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
Default 62, 3.8, engine and trans removal

Is it best to remove the engine along with the transmission, or individually. I need to remove components anyway. My car is an automatic.
 
  #2  
Old 06-12-2024, 11:16 AM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,274
Received 1,410 Likes on 1,090 Posts
Default

They HAVE to come out together. There is no room to separate them:







 
The following users liked this post:
farina43537 (06-15-2024)
  #3  
Old 06-12-2024, 11:19 AM
Cass3958's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Torquay Devon England
Posts: 1,364
Received 1,088 Likes on 708 Posts
Default

It is difficult to split the engine from the gearbox whilst still in the car due to space at the back to reach the upper bell housing bolts. You can remove the gear box on the Auto first leaving the torque converter and bell housing attached to the engine then pull the engine. Most though remove both engine and gearbox at the same time. They can either come out of the top or by dropping the front subframe they can also be dropped out of the bottom.
 
The following 4 users liked this post by Cass3958:
Bill Mac (06-13-2024), farina43537 (06-15-2024), Glyn M Ruck (06-12-2024), S-Type Owner (06-14-2024)
  #4  
Old 06-12-2024, 11:21 AM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,274
Received 1,410 Likes on 1,090 Posts
Default

You would have to cut holes all over the tunnel to get to the bolts.
 
  #5  
Old 06-12-2024, 11:24 AM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,274
Received 1,410 Likes on 1,090 Posts
Default

You can put both in from the bottom without the crossbeam/crossarm/crossmember but they still need to be together.
 

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 06-12-2024 at 11:31 AM.
The following 4 users liked this post by Glyn M Ruck:
Cass3958 (06-13-2024), farina43537 (06-15-2024), Peter3442 (06-12-2024), S-Type Owner (06-14-2024)
  #6  
Old 06-12-2024, 12:54 PM
Homersimpson's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 638
Received 322 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

If its a DG250 automatic then you can remove the autobox with the engine in the car (leaving the torque converter and bell housing on the engine) but its a bit of a fiddle to get to the two bolts on the top.

Unless there is a real need to do it I would take them out together as it saves a lot of hassle.
 
The following 4 users liked this post by Homersimpson:
Cass3958 (06-13-2024), farina43537 (06-15-2024), Glyn M Ruck (06-12-2024), S-Type Owner (06-14-2024)
  #7  
Old 06-12-2024, 01:02 PM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,274
Received 1,410 Likes on 1,090 Posts
Default

It's not a good move even with the DG250. Just asking for more leaks.
 

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 06-12-2024 at 01:08 PM.
The following users liked this post:
farina43537 (06-15-2024)
  #8  
Old 06-12-2024, 01:09 PM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,274
Received 1,410 Likes on 1,090 Posts
Default

The DG250 leaks badly enough as it is.
 
The following users liked this post:
farina43537 (06-15-2024)
  #9  
Old 06-12-2024, 01:11 PM
Homersimpson's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 638
Received 322 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
The DG250 leaks badly enough as it is.
They don't leak, they just mark their spot!
 
The following 2 users liked this post by Homersimpson:
Cass3958 (06-16-2024), farina43537 (06-15-2024)
  #10  
Old 06-12-2024, 02:21 PM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,274
Received 1,410 Likes on 1,090 Posts
Default

They leak like a sieve. Anybody that knows them knows that. Best floor rust preventative around.
 
The following users liked this post:
farina43537 (06-15-2024)
  #11  
Old 06-12-2024, 02:32 PM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,274
Received 1,410 Likes on 1,090 Posts
Default

And they leak worse as the torque converter slowly drains back to sump. Ask Orlando on this forum or The Resister. He has had Ken Jenkins work on his and Graham Whitehouse. There are no greater specialists on the DG250.
 

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 06-12-2024 at 02:46 PM.
  #12  
Old 06-15-2024, 11:26 PM
farina43537's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Maumee, Ohio
Posts: 35
Received 17 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Where did you get the graphic?
 
  #13  
Old 06-16-2024, 01:23 AM
cat_as_trophy's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Inverell, NSW, Australia
Posts: 3,044
Received 1,437 Likes on 893 Posts
Default

Done SO MANY of these back in the day, although very few autos. Preferred option out here in Oz was 4spd manual + electric overdrive.

It's worth pointing to a number of options . . . and a glaring trap evident in the post #2 graphic, which you will stumble into half way through removal. Graphic clearly shows floor jack positioned under but retracted, not engaging the cross-member, thus not lifting the car. Trying to remove combined engine+trans with car on floor, the tailshaft flange will snag on floor while bell-housing snags on firewall. Here then are the options . . .
  • lift, as per the graphic, but with car itself raised about 300mm (1ft) off the ground (makes for quite tall engine lift);
  • tilt engine down without removing cross-member; remove trans (do-able), then lift engine out separately (nuts to re-installing together);
  • lift, as per graphic, but over a pit so rear of trans can droop below floor level (brilliant but rare even in workshop or racing pits);
  • drop and remove front cross-member; lower engine+trans onto a creeper; then lift car and wheel out engine+trans;

And then there was the method we adopted . . . fast and furious . . . because it takes early advantage of later work anyway . . .
  • first, at TDC, disengage cam pulleys and oil feed, removing head, all manifolds carbs etc as a single unit;
  • with upper cam pulleys tied, the engine + trans can be lifted out as shown in graphic, although we still used trolley jack if needed.

Of course. all methods demand that fan and rad be removed and, in all cases, the re-install is easier if combined, as aligning the shaft into clutch is a pain under car . . .

Cheers,

 
  #14  
Old 06-16-2024, 08:42 AM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,274
Received 1,410 Likes on 1,090 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
And they leak worse as the torque converter slowly drains back to sump. Ask Orlando on this forum or The Resister. He has had Ken Jenkins work on his and Graham Whitehouse. There are no greater specialists on the DG250.
I mean Register!!!!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smgdata
XJS ( X27 )
34
02-24-2024 01:10 PM
Felixbobcat
MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler
11
02-12-2024 04:14 AM
Udiasi
XJ ( X351 )
2
01-09-2021 06:46 AM
DayOff
XJ40 ( XJ81 )
4
09-19-2013 05:12 AM
blk05coupe
X-Type ( X400 )
1
07-30-2013 03:47 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: 62, 3.8, engine and trans removal



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 PM.