63 Mk II steering options
#1
63 Mk II steering options
I'm looking at a Mk II that has not been on the road for 11 years. The owner says it took a lot of steering to get down the highway back when he was driving it, so I'm wondering whether a rack & pinion conversion would be necessary to make it a comfortable highway car, or whether simply replacing worn parts and adjustment is indicated. Any experience with this issue?
Thanks,
Steve
Thanks,
Steve
#2
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 117,835
Received 6,364 Likes
on
5,537 Posts
#3
Getting parts for the steering box itself is probably your main problem, but if the box is OK, the track rods are obtainable. As a car in the US, it probably has the Burman power steering fitted, again, parts will be a problem.
There are kits available to convert these cars to rack & pinion, but some modifications are usually necessary to the chassis legs at the front. Converting means you get less turns lock-to-lock and easier parts availability. It does not alter steering geometry, so it will still understeer quite a lot as they all did.
There are kits available to convert these cars to rack & pinion, but some modifications are usually necessary to the chassis legs at the front. Converting means you get less turns lock-to-lock and easier parts availability. It does not alter steering geometry, so it will still understeer quite a lot as they all did.
#4
Steering
Getting parts for the steering box itself is probably your main problem, but if the box is OK, the track rods are obtainable. As a car in the US, it probably has the Burman power steering fitted, again, parts will be a problem.
There are kits available to convert these cars to rack & pinion, but some modifications are usually necessary to the chassis legs at the front. Converting means you get less turns lock-to-lock and easier parts availability. It does not alter steering geometry, so it will still understeer quite a lot as they all did.
There are kits available to convert these cars to rack & pinion, but some modifications are usually necessary to the chassis legs at the front. Converting means you get less turns lock-to-lock and easier parts availability. It does not alter steering geometry, so it will still understeer quite a lot as they all did.
I made an offer and mailed it off, so we'll see whether I will soon be investigating the steering condition.
Have any fitted stiffer rear anti-sway bars to reduce understeer?
#5
The following users liked this post:
russerts (11-26-2010)
#6
Straight and fast
That's fine - if I want to fling it around corners, I'll take the Miata. I'm looking for a comfortable highway car, as opposed to my 49 Ford with a narrowed rear end and ladder bars, combined with the original front suspension.
Thanks!
#7
Trending Topics
#8
I am upgrading my 3.8S to power steering and spoke to others whom said it made a big improvement to the steering.
My car is still at least a few months before complete but I will try to post some pictures and information when it is done as I am doing some suspension mods. Researching it seems like other than poly bushings most people have done little to improve the suspension more. I will be upgrading the front and rears to adjustable coil overs so I can not only choose different spring rates but also adjust the ride height and suspension more to improve the handling. I will also be getting custom offset rims to try to squeeze as much tire in the stock wells. I know I am limited as the 3.8s has part of the rear fenders covering part of the wheels. I know I might only gain a size or two but every tiny bit will help the handling. On my 240Z I modified it to custom coil overs and was able to go from stock 185 tires to 245 tires in the stock fenders but I am guessing the rear on the 3.8S will only get 205 to 225? we will have to see...
My car is still at least a few months before complete but I will try to post some pictures and information when it is done as I am doing some suspension mods. Researching it seems like other than poly bushings most people have done little to improve the suspension more. I will be upgrading the front and rears to adjustable coil overs so I can not only choose different spring rates but also adjust the ride height and suspension more to improve the handling. I will also be getting custom offset rims to try to squeeze as much tire in the stock wells. I know I am limited as the 3.8s has part of the rear fenders covering part of the wheels. I know I might only gain a size or two but every tiny bit will help the handling. On my 240Z I modified it to custom coil overs and was able to go from stock 185 tires to 245 tires in the stock fenders but I am guessing the rear on the 3.8S will only get 205 to 225? we will have to see...
#9
I know it's a bit late, but just discovered this thread.
On my mk2 I installed the front beam from a mk10 / 420G with it's factory power steering already installed. Virtually a bolt in modification.
With regard to your wider wheels in the rear, consider the Coombes type spats, which allow the tires to portrude past the wheel arch.
On my mk2 I installed the front beam from a mk10 / 420G with it's factory power steering already installed. Virtually a bolt in modification.
With regard to your wider wheels in the rear, consider the Coombes type spats, which allow the tires to portrude past the wheel arch.
#10
I know it's a bit late, but just discovered this thread.
On my mk2 I installed the front beam from a mk10 / 420G with it's factory power steering already installed. Virtually a bolt in modification.
With regard to your wider wheels in the rear, consider the Coombes type spats, which allow the tires to portrude past the wheel arch.
On my mk2 I installed the front beam from a mk10 / 420G with it's factory power steering already installed. Virtually a bolt in modification.
With regard to your wider wheels in the rear, consider the Coombes type spats, which allow the tires to portrude past the wheel arch.
#11
#12
Lin I have the rears but have not gotton to the fronts..
I will have to check the brand and post it later but we found a nice quality adjustable coil over shock that is aluminum with adjustable shock settings that are variable that will provide a good amount (1.5 to 2") of height adjustment up or down. We went with about 100lbs stiffer due to the fact I am having a mobile office in the trunk with a HP color laser jet, wire binding machine, fax, machine, and I plan on trying to include a small microwave and refrigerator as well as the two dual batteries.
The fronts will also be adjustable coil over and we will be upgrading the brakes to 4 piston Wilwood with vented rotors. I want to ensure the car can handle and brake well especially after we retrofit the 450HP aluminum block and aluminum head fuel injected GM powerplant!
The fronts will also be adjustable coil over and we will be upgrading the brakes to 4 piston Wilwood with vented rotors. I want to ensure the car can handle and brake well especially after we retrofit the 450HP aluminum block and aluminum head fuel injected GM powerplant!
Last edited by primaz; 10-27-2011 at 06:32 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Lin (10-28-2011)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FS[SouthWest]: Momo Wooden Steering Wheel
RobertTheBloke
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
3
09-24-2015 11:48 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)