MKI / MKII S type 240 340 & Daimler 1955 - 1967

How tell what engine size in a MK2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-15-2023, 04:31 AM
jjsandsms's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Sarasota
Posts: 177
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default How tell what engine size in a MK2

We are currently negotiating to purchase a 1960 MK2 VIN Car No. 125475DN

Using several VIN decoders it seems the car would have come with a 2.4L engine. The engine number on the Vin plate starts with a BG which again says it was a 2.4.

The seller is advertising the car as a 3.8L, so it must have been replaced. We have asked for a photo of the engine serial number which we believe is stamped between the two cam covers at the front. If the engine plate is missing how can we determine the engine size?

Here are the photos supplied by the seller. I have other photos of the engine bay so can one tell by looking at the engine what size it is?

Help
Thanks
jjsandsms





 
  #2  
Old 03-15-2023, 04:57 AM
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,672
Received 2,463 Likes on 1,852 Posts
Default

Hi, the number stamped between the cam covers valley is not the engine number but the cylinder head number and compression ratio.

the engine number would be near the back of the block above the Oil filter head, and on the same side towards the front of the block there will be a JAGUAR 3.8 / 3.4 / 2.4 stamping, a lot more visible than the number.

Being a 1960 early car, chances are the engine was replaced.
 
  #3  
Old 03-15-2023, 05:12 AM
jjsandsms's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Sarasota
Posts: 177
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Thanks for the quick reply, but can you tell from the actual photo of the car we are considering if the engine is a 2.4 or a 3.4/3.8 just by looking at the photo?

Thanks

jjsandsms
 
  #4  
Old 03-15-2023, 05:37 AM
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,672
Received 2,463 Likes on 1,852 Posts
Default

sure looks like a 3.4 or 3.8, and a very good job of it.
 
  #5  
Old 03-15-2023, 06:04 AM
jjsandsms's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Sarasota
Posts: 177
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

here are a couple of more actual photos of engine bay to help ID the engine. Dealer is trying to locate the engine ID plate above the oil filter.







 
  #6  
Old 03-15-2023, 06:11 AM
Jose's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,672
Received 2,463 Likes on 1,852 Posts
Default

there is no ID plate above the oil filter, the number is "punched" on the edge of the block that meets with the sump, near the oil filter head assembly, actually closer to the Starter. But if what you want to know is the displacement, look on the side of the block where it will have the liters shown.
 

Last edited by Jose; 03-15-2023 at 06:14 AM.
  #7  
Old 03-15-2023, 06:56 AM
Cass3958's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Torquay Devon England
Posts: 1,400
Received 1,125 Likes on 731 Posts
Default

The size of the block should be on the side of the block as per the photo under the carbs alongside the distributor. Difficult to see when the engine is in the engine bay but with a decent torch and a rubber neck you should be able to make it out. It will read JAGUAR 3 1/2 LITRE as mine below or 3.8 or 2.4.





The actual engine number is also difficult to read as again it is stamped into the metal of the block just above the oil filter housing underneath the carbs below the embossed JAGUAR name.
Here is my engine number which starts with 7B which designates it as an S Type engine. the numbers 10211 which means in S Type code is a 3.4 and lastly an 8 meaning it has 8:1 compression pistons.



 
The following users liked this post:
Glyn M Ruck (03-15-2023)
  #8  
Old 03-15-2023, 07:42 AM
Peter3442's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,918
Received 1,360 Likes on 1,018 Posts
Default

It looks as those the cam covers have been replaced with a very generous amount of sealant. It's not necessarily a problem, but a good idea to ask why.

Since the engine has been changed, the car is not matching numbers and strictly is a 2.4 with a different engine. Nothing wrong with that, but worth mentioning in discussing the price.

As the engine is swapped, the rear axle should have been changed to match. The ratio should be 3.54 or 3.77 for manual with overdrive. The ratio is given on a tag attached to a diff cover bolt. It appears as a ratio of integers. Originally the 3.8 had a LSD.

Also the overdrive used with the 3.8 engine has stronger springs and a higher hydraulic pressure than that of the 2.4. Make sure it's been swapped or upgraded.
 
  #9  
Old 03-15-2023, 07:59 AM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,524
Received 1,481 Likes on 1,152 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jose
Hi, the number stamped between the cam covers valley is not the engine number but the cylinder head number and compression ratio.

the engine number would be near the back of the block above the Oil filter head, and on the same side towards the front of the block there will be a JAGUAR 3.8 / 3.4 / 2.4 stamping, a lot more visible than the number.

Being a 1960 early car, chances are the engine was replaced.
The number stamped between the cam covers is the engine number & CR. Repeated above the oil filter housing on the block. The 2.4 Diff needs up-rating torque wise if a 3.8 engine has been fitted. If they don't match it usually means the head has been changed likely due to corrosion. (from a donor engine)



 

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 03-15-2023 at 09:21 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Bill Mac (03-15-2023)
  #10  
Old 03-15-2023, 08:05 AM
Cass3958's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Torquay Devon England
Posts: 1,400
Received 1,125 Likes on 731 Posts
Default

Visually you can tell the difference between a 2.4 engine and a 3.4 / 3.8 by the height the engine sits in the engine bay. The 2.4 had a shorter block so sits lower in the engine bay compared to the taller 3.4 / 3.8 engine. Below are a couple of photos as comparison.
At the front of the engine the filler cap spout on the radiator sits above the cam cover on the 2.4 compared with 3.4 shown where it sits half way up the cam cover. At at the back the 2.4 cam covers are a lot lower against the firewall than the 3.4. Tried to show this with the three following photos. Looking at the photos you have shown it definitely looks like a taller block from the position of the radiator filler cap in relation to the cam covers.


2.4 Engine bay.

3.4 Engine bay
 

Last edited by Cass3958; 03-15-2023 at 08:08 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Glyn M Ruck (03-15-2023)
  #11  
Old 03-15-2023, 08:15 AM
Bill Mac's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Joyner, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 962
Received 1,069 Likes on 627 Posts
Default

If there is no number stamped between the cam covers it means that the original head has been replaced with a new head. I have run across this in an XK120 and a MK8.
 
The following users liked this post:
Glyn M Ruck (03-15-2023)
  #12  
Old 03-15-2023, 08:20 AM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,524
Received 1,481 Likes on 1,152 Posts
Default

Absolutely correct Bill as usual.
 
  #13  
Old 03-15-2023, 09:41 AM
Cass3958's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Torquay Devon England
Posts: 1,400
Received 1,125 Likes on 731 Posts
Default

I have no paperwork to suggest this has happened to mine (change of head) but I do not have a number on my head just on the side of the engine block.
 
  #14  
Old 03-15-2023, 09:54 AM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,524
Received 1,481 Likes on 1,152 Posts
Default

Rob ~ some heads slipped through without the engine number repeated somehow. I've seen a couple like that from import production. It was more common on 4.2 engines. Who knows how or why. Our SA built Engines were religiously stamped in both places. Any 3.4 in SA is an import via Rhodesia or whatever. We only built and sold 3.8's & 4.2's here.
 

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 03-15-2023 at 09:21 PM.
  #15  
Old 03-15-2023, 12:04 PM
Peter3442's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,918
Received 1,360 Likes on 1,018 Posts
Default

I'm not sure when, probably late 1960s, possibly early 1970s, Jaguar stopped putting the engine number on the head. I'm fairly sure series XJ6 cars don't have it; the series 3 in my workshop certainly doesn't. As the engine under consideration has already swapped cars and looks as though it has had some work, it may well not have it's original head.

Anyway, from the photos, it looks like a tall block and hence 3.4 litres or bigger.
 
The following users liked this post:
Glyn M Ruck (03-15-2023)
  #16  
Old 03-15-2023, 09:44 PM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,524
Received 1,481 Likes on 1,152 Posts
Default

I knew I had it some where. Genuine Mk2 Engines. Of course your engine could have come from another model as well (e.g. S Type). If so give it to us & we will see if we can trace it.






e.g.. all S Type engine numbers start with 1B or P1B if fitted with Power Steering (with the stamps they use the 1 looks like a 7)


240, 340 Range.




Credit James Taylor.
 

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 03-16-2023 at 05:25 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Peter3442 (03-16-2023)
  #17  
Old 03-16-2023, 03:21 AM
Peter3442's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,918
Received 1,360 Likes on 1,018 Posts
Default

... with the one minor exception that the very rare, special order 3.8 litre 340 cars had engine numbers with the prefixes EE and SE (not from the S-type sequence).
 
The following users liked this post:
Glyn M Ruck (03-16-2023)
  #18  
Old 03-16-2023, 03:39 AM
Cass3958's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Torquay Devon England
Posts: 1,400
Received 1,125 Likes on 731 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
All S Type engine numbers start with 1B or P1B if fitted with Power Steering (with the stamps they use the 1 looks like a 7)
Glyn sorry to correct you but this should read "S Type Chassis numbers start with a 1B or P1B" All S type engine numbers do start with a 7 and are 7B. Your engine number is 7B60908-8 for instance.

See my post #7 and your post #9.
 

Last edited by Cass3958; 03-16-2023 at 03:45 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Glyn M Ruck (03-16-2023)
  #19  
Old 03-16-2023, 03:40 AM
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,524
Received 1,481 Likes on 1,152 Posts
Default

Thanks for that Peter and Cass. One never knows which scribe to believe. The so called 1's on the Register certainly look like 7's in reality. Pleased you cleared that up. My chassis number on the bonnet slam panel also looks like a 7 and not a 1.
 

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 03-16-2023 at 06:53 AM.
  #20  
Old 03-16-2023, 04:00 AM
Peter3442's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,918
Received 1,360 Likes on 1,018 Posts
Default

My info on the 3.8 340 comes from the owner of one who has researched the cars with JDHT. It's also in agreement with Bernard Viart (see link below) who produced a long list of engine numbers and head types

https://www.jag-lovers.org/xk-lovers...y/engines.html
 
The following users liked this post:
Glyn M Ruck (03-16-2023)


Quick Reply: How tell what engine size in a MK2



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 AM.