T5 gearbox upgrade
#1
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Fitting a Tremac T5 manual gearbox to an ex auto and having a problem with the gear lever movement being so great as to hit the sides of the tunnel gaiter box before engaging the gears, I need a short shift top on the box to overcome this problem, does anybody know of a short shift unit that will fit this Mk2 adapted T5 gearbox. There are plenty on the market but which one fits this conversion. When I have finished and it’s up and running I will post all issues arising and how we solved the problems.
#2
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What is the T5 from? There are many variants with different shifter positions.
I used a Ford Motorsport version, deigned to fit a Mustang and used the Mustang shift lever, turned 180 degrees. The reason was the shifter came up too far rearward for me, the shifter reversed brought it forward.
I used a Ford Motorsport version, deigned to fit a Mustang and used the Mustang shift lever, turned 180 degrees. The reason was the shifter came up too far rearward for me, the shifter reversed brought it forward.
The following 3 users liked this post by Jagboi64:
#3
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,376
Received 1,443 Likes
on
1,119 Posts
The following users liked this post:
Captain Jim (05-28-2022)
#4
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It sounds as though the shift mechanism sits very low relative to the top of the tunnel? Roadcraft in the UK sell a T5 and mention a shortshift tail housing for Jaguars.
Jagboi, Doesn't the Mustang version (or some of them) have a long tail to move the shifter further back?
Jagboi, Doesn't the Mustang version (or some of them) have a long tail to move the shifter further back?
Last edited by Peter3442; 05-27-2022 at 02:58 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Captain Jim (05-28-2022)
#5
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Mustang:
![](https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.jaguarforums.com-vbulletin/600x265/t5_6fd1a6dbf0ca6ce9b83f1db42eb55657b343d578.jpg)
Chev S10:
![](https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.jaguarforums.com-vbulletin/599x299/s10_t5_transmission_sale_bcfb0500794a321591a66d5aa8bda49c57411f92.jpg)
The following 3 users liked this post by Jagboi64:
#6
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If I was doing it again, I'd probably use the Chev version for two reasons. One is the shifter is further forward and that's a better fit in an S Type/ Mark2, and also I have run into problems getting the rear of the transmission high enough into the car to obtain proper driveline angles on the drive (prop)shaft. The S 10 version has an extension housing that is lower profile than the Ford.
However, the input shaft length is shorter on the Chev, and with the Ford I was able to use a Mark 2 bellhousing and clutch and I made an adapter plate between the bellhousing and the transmission. I couldn't do that with the S10 version, as the input shaft is too short.
However, the input shaft length is shorter on the Chev, and with the Ford I was able to use a Mark 2 bellhousing and clutch and I made an adapter plate between the bellhousing and the transmission. I couldn't do that with the S10 version, as the input shaft is too short.
The following 3 users liked this post by Jagboi64:
Trending Topics
#8
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The T5 I have is the Ford motorsport version, which has all the improvements in terms of the greatest torque capacity, carbon fiber blocker rings and a short throw shifter. As I mentioned, there are many different specifications of T5 out there, as they were used by a number of OEM's and built to different specifications. I'm also using synthetic ATF as the lubricant, if that makes an difference. Regular Dexron III is specified.
One thing I do like is because there were so many variants, it's easy to adapt. Mine originally came with a 0.63 5th gear ratio, and even with a 3.77 axle I found that too tall. I changed it using some Camaro spec gears to a 0.73 OD ratio and the 3.8 is much happier with that. 70 mph works out to around 2400 RPM, which is a good tradeoff between power and economy. Highway cruising I can achieve 30mpg, which I think is excellent for an old car.
The following 3 users liked this post by Jagboi64:
#9
The following 2 users liked this post by JeffR1:
Captain Jim (05-28-2022),
Peter3442 (05-28-2022)
#10
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's good to hear that the T5 works well, especially as the supply of Toyota's W58 seems to have totally dried up. With companies that sell them to the UK kit car market offering much better prices than those in the classic Jaguar business, the T5 is looking a more attractive option.
We've discussed gearbox lubricants a few weeks ago, but I had the same experience with my Moss box: ATF made it much more pleasant (or less unpleasant) than the standard oil. That was years ago, nowadays there are manual transmission fluids.
We've discussed gearbox lubricants a few weeks ago, but I had the same experience with my Moss box: ATF made it much more pleasant (or less unpleasant) than the standard oil. That was years ago, nowadays there are manual transmission fluids.
The following users liked this post:
Captain Jim (05-28-2022)
#11
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,376
Received 1,443 Likes
on
1,119 Posts
The following users liked this post:
Captain Jim (05-28-2022)
#12
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,376
Received 1,443 Likes
on
1,119 Posts
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
A Potassium Borate ISO 32 does the best job by far. We make it but it's going to be hard to find. We even pack it in 500ml squeeze bottles with spouts.
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 05-28-2022 at 07:33 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Captain Jim (05-28-2022)
#13
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
After Jim's earlier thread on the gearbox swap, I met Adrian from Realm Engineering at Spares Day. They seem to be offering the W59 with the excuse that it's better for a heavier vehicle - Toyota used it in trucks. I think that it's as much the case that almost all the W58 boxes have been taken because they are so nice. I'm sure the W59 works well, but the ratios are far from appropriate, especially for a sports saloon that's not that heavy by modrn standards. If I had to use it, I'd want to change the axle ratio to 3.3, something Jaguar almost never used, making the whole process very expensive. Without the W58, I think the T5 looks the best way to go. For those who don't have easy access to a machine shop, it's just a matter of arranging the parts at a better price than the Jaguar specialists ask.
The following users liked this post:
Glyn M Ruck (05-28-2022)
#15
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
For anyone wanting to check RPM / gear ratios / road speed in each gear this is a good web sight.
Put in your criteria and watch the results.
https://www.blocklayer.com/rpm-gear.aspx
Put in your criteria and watch the results.
https://www.blocklayer.com/rpm-gear.aspx
#16
The following users liked this post:
Captain Jim (06-07-2022)
#17
#18
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 5,376
Received 1,443 Likes
on
1,119 Posts
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
PM Sent. I don't advertise my old company on forums & I'm open about where I think the competition did a better job e.g. another company on nuclear ~ not a strength of ours. They can't fire me in retirement. We all have our strong points.
What I will say ~ rest in PM ~ is: We hold the Pottasium Borate patents. We developed it but our additive company will sell the additive to other companies today. Potasium Borate creates a greater film thickness while working best in low viscosity base oils that allow it to migrate to the lubricated part more quickly. It bonds by a process of Electrophoresis to parts.
What I will say ~ rest in PM ~ is: We hold the Pottasium Borate patents. We developed it but our additive company will sell the additive to other companies today. Potasium Borate creates a greater film thickness while working best in low viscosity base oils that allow it to migrate to the lubricated part more quickly. It bonds by a process of Electrophoresis to parts.
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 06-05-2022 at 12:20 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)