S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Gentlemen/Ladies..... I need your input.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-08-2012, 09:22 PM
John Fox's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 476
Received 78 Likes on 58 Posts
Default Gentlemen/Ladies..... I need your input.

I've been a Jaguarguy now for some 35 years, have owned many, member on a couple Jaguar forms but im kinda lost here with what Im asking.

I have a very close friend who wants me to find her an S Type. She has driven both my XJ8 and XKR but in reality she needs a small 4 door and not an X type as she doesnt like how they look but she loves S's. She wants something newer so Im thinking 06-08. Good gas mileage so Im figuring a 6 over the 8 but I need some input as to what I should look for. In the XJ8 and XK8 cars I know all the good and bad but know nothing about the S's except they are great looking IMHO.

So if I could get some pointers I would appreciate it. Again, the body, interior and such I can peg good or bad but I need to know what mechanical glitches to look out for or to check.

Thanks in advance.
 
  #2  
Old 03-08-2012, 09:38 PM
joycesjag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sunny South Carolina
Posts: 8,002
Received 1,703 Likes on 1,211 Posts
Default

John, look in the FAQ thread here in the S Type. Loads of useful knowledge, even a "what to look for".

If you or your friend finds one, post up as many pictures on here (S Type) there are many eyes here that will find just about anything wrong.

Good luck to your friend, she will love it!
 
  #3  
Old 03-08-2012, 11:11 PM
Oldengineer's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: WV
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Just a comment about the 6 vs 8. I had an 06 S Type VDP with the 4.2 NA. It got excellent fuel economy. I doubt that the 6 would do significantly better. Before the S, I owned 2 X Types - a 2.5 and a 3.0. Neither delivered the fuel economy of the V8 S Type.

Regards:
Oldengineer
2011 Mercedes Benz GLK350 4Matic
2010 Honda CRV LX
1948 Chevrolet Fleetmaster Town Sedan
 

Last edited by Oldengineer; 03-08-2012 at 11:13 PM.
  #4  
Old 03-08-2012, 11:32 PM
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,263 Likes on 1,845 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Oldengineer
Just a comment about the 6 vs 8. I had an 06 S Type VDP with the 4.2 NA. It got excellent fuel economy. I doubt that the 6 would do significantly better. Before the S, I owned 2 X Types - a 2.5 and a 3.0. Neither delivered the fuel economy of the V8 S Type.
Agreed- go for the 4.2

Aside from knowing the accident history of a car, mileage and general condition, there's not many variables to worry about. Extremely reliable cars.
 
  #5  
Old 03-09-2012, 02:00 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,781
Received 4,534 Likes on 3,943 Posts
Default

The 4.2 can be hard to find so don't rule out the 3.0, though I know which I'd rather drive!
 
  #6  
Old 03-09-2012, 05:48 AM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

I would never put a friend in anything but a V8!
 
  #7  
Old 03-09-2012, 07:29 AM
joycesjag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sunny South Carolina
Posts: 8,002
Received 1,703 Likes on 1,211 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bfsgross
I would never put a friend in anything but a V8!

Kinda like "friends don't let friends drive V6s"(?) !!!!!!!
 
The following users liked this post:
bfsgross (03-09-2012)
  #8  
Old 03-09-2012, 07:34 AM
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Miami
Posts: 361
Received 221 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Im a jaguar tech, dont go for the v6 cause they bring to many problems. A Jaguar owner shouldn't be worried about fuel economy. besides, the 4.2 is the same engine they put on the xks and xjs, so its a proven good engine.
 
  #9  
Old 03-09-2012, 08:13 AM
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 117,454
Received 6,323 Likes on 5,510 Posts
Default

Hmm, not sure that I can agree with that, what additional problems do you see with the V6?
 
  #10  
Old 03-09-2012, 08:22 AM
The Chris X's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,475
Received 128 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Norri
Hmm, not sure that I can agree with that, what additional problems do you see with the V6?
I think just the part with the "V" and "6".....

Ha - just kidding Norri.

I'd opt for the V8 myself, but the 6 is no slouch.

Refer to the FAQ's for sure, and the idea to post up the exact car under consideration is a good one, someone will usually spot something that is useful for further examination. If we can keep the thread on topic, which is 50/50 at best.
 
  #11  
Old 03-09-2012, 08:36 AM
Jon89's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 12,613
Received 4,369 Likes on 2,857 Posts
Default

Many good points have already been made here, especially Rick's advice regarding reading the FAQ section here in the S-Type forum. There are a number of issues that are common and must be addressed regardless of whether you choose the V6 or V8. But the S-Type remains one of the best bang-for-the-buck rear-wheel-drive sedans on the market today. Stick with the 2003-and-up version to minimize the issues. The newer, the better....
 
  #12  
Old 03-09-2012, 08:48 AM
qikcat's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: marietta/ GA
Posts: 396
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Get her an STR and say to heck with the fuel economy! Seriously though if she stays in the 06-08 range it should make her a good car. I would be a little worried getting one with many miles if you could not DIY some things on your own.
 
  #13  
Old 03-09-2012, 09:28 AM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Sorry Rick...just venting. The V6's are cool too. Muddah? Is that you? Time for my meds? Coming.
 
  #14  
Old 03-09-2012, 09:44 AM
Gus's Avatar
Gus
Gus is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Berlin Md.
Posts: 11,341
Received 2,213 Likes on 1,702 Posts
Default

My 3.0 got 26mpg going to Va and 28mpg on the way back to Md. What you want and expect will dictate what you look for and purchase. The 3.0 V6 will give you a kick in the pants but a 4.0 or 4.2 will do it better. As a side note the 4.2 is from 2003.5 on is preferred by many.

Link http://jagrepair.com/images/AutoRepa...sb_09_2009.pdf Engine Data on page 67
 
  #15  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:17 AM
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 117,454
Received 6,323 Likes on 5,510 Posts
Default

We all know bigger is better.

But is there any evidence that there is any reliability advantage of the 4.2 over the 3.0?
 
  #16  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:27 AM
Gus's Avatar
Gus
Gus is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Berlin Md.
Posts: 11,341
Received 2,213 Likes on 1,702 Posts
Default

I have both the 4.0 in my 99XK8 and a 3.0 in my 00S-Type and for the cost of operation both are about the same with the exception of the number of cylinders and the kick in the pants. I am unable to speak for the 4.2 engine but would feel it is about the same as the 4.0.
 
  #17  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:48 AM
Bacardi 151's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,058
Received 78 Likes on 74 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Fox
So if I could get some pointers I would appreciate it.
John Fox, you need to trade Tim Tebow and sign Peyton Manning! Back on topic, I agree with a 4.2 or even a STR...
 
  #18  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:49 AM
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,263 Likes on 1,845 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Norri

But is there any evidence that there is any reliability advantage of the 4.2 over the 3.0?
I'd like to hear more about this too. First I've heard that there's 'iss-yoos' with the V6.
 
  #19  
Old 03-09-2012, 10:52 AM
Gus's Avatar
Gus
Gus is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Berlin Md.
Posts: 11,341
Received 2,213 Likes on 1,702 Posts
Default

?
Originally Posted by Mikey
I'd like to hear more about this too. First I've heard that there's 'iss-yoos' with the V6.
 
  #20  
Old 03-09-2012, 11:10 AM
Jon89's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 12,613
Received 4,369 Likes on 2,857 Posts
Default

The 3.0 V6 is a solid, well-proven engine - the most common engine during the S-Type's 1999 to 2008 run (here in the U.S., anyway). The only "issue" it has that the V8 engine does not suffer from are the two substandard IMT O-rings installed at the factory. But that's a $5 fix that you do yourself with the assistance of this forum....

We have the 3.0 in our S-Type and the 4.2 in my wife's XK8. Our 3.0 has been extremely reliable and exceptionally thrifty on gas mileage, and I expect our 4.2 to be just as reliable but not as thrifty. Time will tell....
 


Quick Reply: Gentlemen/Ladies..... I need your input.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.