S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2005 and up are better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-07-2010, 09:03 AM
Mikey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,263 Likes on 1,845 Posts
Default 2005 and up are better?

I've seen several posts that mention 2005 and up are 'better'. I know there was a cosmetic upgrade in that year, but what mechanical changes took place that make them superior in a mechanical/reliability sense?
 
  #2  
Old 04-07-2010, 10:21 AM
JOsworth's Avatar
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Akron, Ohio USA
Posts: 3,390
Received 194 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Yes, the major mechanical update was the one for the 2003 model year in North America (2002.5 in Europe). The cosmetic refresh occurred for the 2005 model. Now there may have been some minor changes..I have a press pack for the 2005 refresh that lists all the changes..I'll check that this evening when I get home. There is/was a feeling that the 05's were more "sorted" but I doubt that. They seem to have the same frequency of common failures as the "earlier" cars. IE: Throttle Body, IMT Leak, Coolant Bottle, and the list goes on. Not that they are bad, in my opinion they are really good cars considering the level of complexity. That said, I would rate an 03 the same as an 05 and up. If there are more reported issues with 03's that is probably more a result of age and mileage than anything else.
 
  #3  
Old 04-07-2010, 10:32 AM
carelm's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 3,327
Received 166 Likes on 134 Posts
Default

In my "unbiased" opinion 2005 was the year the S-Type finally matured. As mentioned earlier the cosmetics were updated as well as some other mechanical upgrades. The handling is excellent in my opinion, probably on par with the 5 series BMW or E Class Mercedes. As a used car they represent a pretty good value for the money, especially if you have the extended warranty.

Mike
 
  #4  
Old 04-07-2010, 10:42 AM
Jon89's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 12,624
Received 4,379 Likes on 2,860 Posts
Default

The copious amounts of research I did prior to purchasing our S-Type in December 2008 led me to the conclusion that the 2005-and-up models are indeed the best way to go if you're chasing an S-Type. Others here on the forum have expressed the same opinion or drawn the same conclusion. Part of that reasoning comes from the general consensus that by 2005, some of the earlier common failures attributed to substandard parts (one example is coils, another example is window regulators) had been through multiple re-designs (and in some cases, different vendors and suppliers) and were finally good enough to be considered "fixed". I'm sure that some of the reasoning is also subjective - after all, a newer car with fewer miles is usually a better bet as previously-troublesome issues in the model run get engineering attention once again and usually get fixed if the model run lives long enough....

Do your own research and draw your own conclusions. I'm happy with our 2005 and would not retreat to a 2004-or-older S-Type....
 

Last edited by Jon89; 04-07-2010 at 10:46 AM.
  #5  
Old 04-07-2010, 10:58 AM
JOsworth's Avatar
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Akron, Ohio USA
Posts: 3,390
Received 194 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

But Jon...The things you mentioned...Coils and Window Regualtors were fixed for the 03 and up cars...
 
  #6  
Old 04-07-2010, 11:04 AM
Jon89's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 12,624
Received 4,379 Likes on 2,860 Posts
Default

Yes, the window regulators were re-designed prior to 2005. But I was told by two different Jaguar master techs that they were still experimenting with coils up through most of the 2004 production run and did not sort that issue until just prior to the 2005 production run began....

Truth? Hype? Somewhere in between? I don't know, but all that information went directly into the mix I worked through before I came to the conclusion that 2005-and-newer was the best path for me to follow....
 

Last edited by Jon89; 04-07-2010 at 11:13 AM.
  #7  
Old 04-07-2010, 11:46 AM
Mikey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,263 Likes on 1,845 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JOsworth
But Jon...The things you mentioned...Coils and Window Regualtors were fixed for the 03 and up cars...
Exactly, which is one of the reasons I chose '03 and up in my search. The cosmetic AND mechanical upgrades of that year and newer made it worthwhile.
 
  #8  
Old 04-07-2010, 11:47 AM
Mikey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,263 Likes on 1,845 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by carelm
In my "unbiased" opinion 2005 was the year the S-Type finally matured. As mentioned earlier the cosmetics were updated as well as some other mechanical upgrades. The handling is excellent in my opinion, probably on par with the 5 series BMW or E Class Mercedes.
What is different in 2005 and up suspension?
 
  #9  
Old 04-07-2010, 12:36 PM
JOsworth's Avatar
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Akron, Ohio USA
Posts: 3,390
Received 194 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mikey
Exactly, which is one of the reasons I chose '03 and up in my search. The cosmetic AND mechanical upgrades of that year and newer made it worthwhile.
OK, now a bit of reverse...What were the cosmetic changes to the 03 other than a new dash? I personally don't count the dashboard change as cosmetic since the "real" reason they did it was to fit updated electronics.
 
  #10  
Old 04-07-2010, 12:54 PM
carelm's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 3,327
Received 166 Likes on 134 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mikey
What is different in 2005 and up suspension?
Mikey,

As far as I know the suspension was unchanged. However, an aluminum hood shaved some weight off the front end and the tighter tolerances between the various body panels improved the torsional rigidity.

Mike
 
  #11  
Old 04-07-2010, 03:17 PM
androulakis's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 2,964
Received 507 Likes on 259 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JOsworth
OK, now a bit of reverse...What were the cosmetic changes to the 03 other than a new dash? I personally don't count the dashboard change as cosmetic since the "real" reason they did it was to fit updated electronics.
The only cosmetic change between the 00 and 03 externally were the door mirrors...

The body changed for 05 - new hood, front bumper, tail lights, trunk lid, rear quarters etc...

The interior changed in 03, as well as all the electronics went from Ford to Jaguar.
 
  #12  
Old 04-07-2010, 03:22 PM
Mikey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,263 Likes on 1,845 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JOsworth
OK, now a bit of reverse...What were the cosmetic changes to the 03 other than a new dash? I personally don't count the dashboard change as cosmetic since the "real" reason they did it was to fit updated electronics.
Dash and centre console, deletion of the parking bake handle. That's cosmetic in my book. The 2002 and earlier dash was not my cup of tea.
 
  #13  
Old 04-07-2010, 03:26 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,788
Received 4,538 Likes on 3,947 Posts
Default

The STR arrived in 02/3 and has a mesh grille plus trunk lid spoiler. New, bigger wheels, too, I think. I don't think the tail lights are the same as the pre-facelift cars. Oh and HID lights, don't they look a bit different? Plus they de-chromed. I believe the ride height changed (due to the improved suspension).
 
  #14  
Old 04-07-2010, 07:15 PM
JOsworth's Avatar
Veteran member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Akron, Ohio USA
Posts: 3,390
Received 194 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

So, here is the press release I talked about earlier. They do talk about some revisions to the suspension and steering but from reading it over it is a little vague as to when that was changed.
 
Attached Files
File Type: doc
S-TYPE_JNA.doc (52.0 KB, 105 views)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redxk8
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
18
10-04-2015 08:28 AM
Johnken
X-Type ( X400 )
2
10-02-2015 10:12 AM
Johnken
X-Type ( X400 )
3
10-01-2015 05:07 PM
JaguarSV8
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
9
10-01-2015 01:58 AM
dmatthewman
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
1
09-30-2015 10:10 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: 2005 and up are better?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM.