S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2006 S-Type-R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #121  
Old 06-08-2012, 07:25 AM
joycesjag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sunny South Carolina
Posts: 8,002
Received 1,703 Likes on 1,211 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bfsgross
Robin, pop on the 1.7 lb pulley,

easy peasy Japanesey.....


 
The following users liked this post:
bfsgross (06-08-2012)
  #122  
Old 06-08-2012, 08:06 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,779
Received 4,534 Likes on 3,943 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OESIII
I've spoken to several dyno techs from different garages and two said for an automatic you should multiply RWHP by 18% to 20% to come up with CHP. One tech stated that with a six speed tranny it's more like at least 25% times RWHP.
I don't see why a 6-speed should have larger losses. It's also in direct contradiction of ZF's statements. I think the tech is wrong.
 
  #123  
Old 06-08-2012, 08:12 AM
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,263 Likes on 1,845 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JagV8
I don't see why a 6-speed should have larger losses. It's also in direct contradiction of ZF's statements. I think the tech is wrong.
Agreed. The number of 'speeds' in a transmission is irrelevant. Kinda scary how many ignorant or misinformed techs there are out there. Reminds me of the old joke about '95% of lawyers making the remainder look bad'
 
  #124  
Old 06-08-2012, 11:05 AM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default That's True

Originally Posted by Mikey
Agreed. The number of 'speeds' in a transmission is irrelevant. Kinda scary how many ignorant or misinformed techs there are out there. Reminds me of the old joke about '95% of lawyers making the remainder look bad'
That's True.
 
  #125  
Old 06-08-2012, 12:48 PM
Robinb's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 880
Received 181 Likes on 138 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Avos:
A TS is indeed a way to dramticaly increase power, but it also comes at a cost, so for most this will be out of reach.
Well Avos, my twin-screw piggy bank now has $1000 credit because of no ECU tuning. Look at it this way:
Qwiketx+K&N cost about $300 for a 15+ rwhp increase.
1.7 lb pulley (incl. fitting) cost about $300 for a 15+ rwhp increase.
Hi-flow cats cost about $500 for a 20+ rwhp increase.

A twin-screw SC uses less electricity, generates less heat and maybe could produce 120-150 HP more power in an STR. So, are we talking $2000? (a bargain), $3000 (could be), $4000 (hard to justify) or $5000 (not likely)?
 
  #126  
Old 06-08-2012, 02:29 PM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

TS $$? Fraid your looking at $5000. A blower port/polish ($450) and "Chiller Killer" ($600) has added another 25+ hp on top of the mods you listed. Stiegmier Performance now has a water cooled front snout for the blower. This'll dramatically lower blower temps., maintaining ignition lead. This's the way I'm going....
 

Last edited by bfsgross; 06-09-2012 at 07:54 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Panthro (06-17-2012)
  #127  
Old 06-08-2012, 02:51 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,779
Received 4,534 Likes on 3,943 Posts
Default

Er... the port & polish may have produced ZERO (near enough or actually) from what was posted so where does a non-zero figure come from?
 
  #128  
Old 06-08-2012, 04:20 PM
MirEgal's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 27
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Simple Explanation please

I've been reading the threads of this post with both interest and confusion. The interest is that I also have a 2006 STR and i'm interested in how to pump some more horsepower out of it. My confusion comes from not understanding most of what has been discussed here. I'm sorry to say that although I'm pretty comfortable working on my 68 GT Mustang, when it comes to my STR I am totally in the dark on what to do. Can anyone either point me in the direction of some FAQ's or explain to me the steps/process and/or different options on pumping up my STR. Thanks.
 
  #129  
Old 06-08-2012, 04:57 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,779
Received 4,534 Likes on 3,943 Posts
Default

Someone will, but a major problem to bear in mind is that by law these cars need a complex computer to control and report emissions - which combined with the small production numbers means various things are either not available or are expensive. (I'm not even mentioning that the engine bay is kinda full. LOL)
 
  #130  
Old 06-08-2012, 06:29 PM
Robinb's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 880
Received 181 Likes on 138 Posts
Default

MirEgal, I was an STR ignoramus when I joined this forum about 4 months ago. Once I knew my '05 STR was on its way, I read every single posting about this car on the forum. Soon got a good feel for the strengths (many) and weaknesses (few) of the STR. I would suggest you consider doing the same, if only to get an all-round knowledge of the car rather than just what's needed for more power. However, to answer your question:

Do a search for Mina and read through the Qwiketz inlet tube posting. The first and easiest step is to instal a 3" air inlet tube (quiketz still has 3 available) and K&N filter, part number 33-2273. That will give you 15-18 rwhp and you will feel the difference.

Next, get and fit a smaller supercharger pulley. There are 2 kinds, the 1.7 lb pulley from Mina, and the 3 lb from Eurotoys (1.7 and 3 refers to the increased boost psi that results from the supercharger spinning faster). From all accounts, the Mina is easier to fit, but the Eurotoys will give more power, and you should gain 15 - 25 more rwhp.

The other power gains come from fitting high-flow Magnaflow cats, polishing the supercharger port (Google "Stiegmeyer"), installing a "chiller-killer" device to keep down supercharger temperatures, plus a few others. Other forum members know more about this - bfsgross for sure will be happy to advise the probable cost and power gain of each option. Forum members also advise that the ZF tranny has a limit of around 440-450 HP, so don't go too crazy all at once!
 
The following users liked this post:
bfsgross (06-09-2012)
  #131  
Old 06-08-2012, 07:28 PM
Bad Cattitude's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 9,084
Received 567 Likes on 514 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bfsgross
Robin, pop on the 1.7 lb pulley, hi-flow cats, Maganaflow Tru-X center muffler (has built in x-pipe), hard re-set the ECU, then Hang-On! I'm estimating 450 chp @ nearly 500 lb/ft torque. The beautiful thing about this small motor is that it's a DOHC 4 valves/cylinder, blown, quick winding super breather that puts down immense torque at low RPM's. Though she churns 2.89 rear cogs, the blower coupled with the ZF's low 4:1 1st gear makes it all feel like a big block at launch time, then an auto bahn cruiser after 4th gear, with a power band seemingly nowhere in sight. Where can one get all this plus a beautiful exterior, interior, ride, all for $15,000?
 
The following users liked this post:
bfsgross (06-09-2012)
  #132  
Old 06-08-2012, 11:20 PM
bklynchris's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,050
Received 54 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Robinb, Bfsgross, cat man do, thx for the info. I want to mod out my '05 STR but really didn't have a clue where to start. I have an idea now. Do u suggest I do a dyno pull before I start modding it out? I was just going to let my "butt dyno" be the judge. Thanks again.
 
  #133  
Old 06-08-2012, 11:47 PM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,616
Received 1,068 Likes on 761 Posts
Default

@RobinB,
Am afraid the TS is not for you then ;-)


@All
Everyone is throwing rwhp numbers around, as if you can get easily 50 to 75 hp more. I have been following lots of threads, but somehow I have yet to see any good proof (but could have missed a dyno) of these large numbers mentioned.

So a question; after so many years these cars are on the road, and similar years that the same mods (pulleys, ported superchargers, cooling, intake tubing, cats, exhausts etc) have been around, there should be someone that can show some dyno proof or?
 
  #134  
Old 06-09-2012, 12:56 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,779
Received 4,534 Likes on 3,943 Posts
Default

Most people just dyno once. Mostly after the mods. Beats me why.

Only a few post any figures.
 
  #135  
Old 06-09-2012, 01:05 AM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,616
Received 1,068 Likes on 761 Posts
Default

Maybe, I also think many don't like to show disapointing results...
 
  #136  
Old 06-09-2012, 01:33 AM
Robinb's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 880
Received 181 Likes on 138 Posts
Default

Avos, if the twin-screw S/C is $5000+ I will at least get peace of mind and stop fretting about when it will be available.

it seems that dyno readings are quite temperature and machine-dependent, and the repeatability of the test is so unreliable that spending $125 on a dyno test to confirm a gain of 15-20 rwhp is probably a waste of time and money. Or have I morphed into a bitter dyno-atheist?
 
  #137  
Old 06-09-2012, 01:40 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,779
Received 4,534 Likes on 3,943 Posts
Default

Does seem like people are doing multiple mods, costing at least 10 times that figure, but commonly no dynos. It's fine, but it's no way to prove anything or encourage others
 
  #138  
Old 06-09-2012, 02:21 AM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,616
Received 1,068 Likes on 761 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Robinb
Avos, if the twin-screw S/C is $5000+ I will at least get peace of mind and stop fretting about when it will be available.

it seems that dyno readings are quite temperature and machine-dependent, and the repeatability of the test is so unreliable that spending $125 on a dyno test to confirm a gain of 15-20 rwhp is probably a waste of time and money. Or have I morphed into a bitter dyno-atheist?
A base dyno has great value imho, as it will help to understand the status of your car from the start. Anyone that just wants a little more performance (ie 20 or so), has enough with the butt dyno, as there it only matters that one thinks there is an improvement. Anyone looking for 50 or more is another matter, you want to do this as good as possible, and of course with proven mods. There it does matter to do dyno runs, as costs for all the mods to get to these values do stack up.

Why don’t you send me your dyno slip, I can help in interpreting the results, so at least you do get some more value for your results.
 
  #139  
Old 06-09-2012, 07:58 AM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default Lol

Originally Posted by Cat Man Do
Def. can picture that. LOL
 
  #140  
Old 06-09-2012, 08:23 AM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

To all, these are my thoughts and experience: Though what I write is basically anecdotal, my 03 STR was dynoed nearly two years ago and we observed 360 rwhp. It took 40 minutes to reach the dyno in 80 degree temps. Ice bags on charge cooler, room fan on, and spraying the intercooler radiator with water. Though DSC was disabled she smelled of burning rubber and threw the ABS light. The dyno slip was e-mailed two month post dyno and I haven't a clue how to post info. for the life of me and the slip is gone and the dyno shop and I hate each other due to my recieving the dyno slip two months post dyno. Now... The STR's ECU is adaptive, the modded air intake tube obviously allows her to breath better, a pulley definitely makes a noticeable difference, and hi-flow cats allows the throttle to bang the tach like a pro. Contrary to jagv8's contention but maintaining my respect for him, a blower port/polish will make power and lower temps as proven by numerous dyno pulls on some STR's and Cobra's, etc. As for maintaining power with the stock Eaton blower, a methyl alcohol or "Chiller Killer" is key. We've all enjoyed the raw power when she's cool in the morning? As for reliable dyno numbers, the correct dyno and disabling of DSC is of paramount importance. At the present, my STR is likely experiencing an intake manifold vaccume leak and will be with Jaguar for repair. Without the leak she ran like skunk. She'd smoke her old stock self. Two different animals till heat soak set in. Dyno or Butt dyno...we're on the right track. Go to dragtimes.com Here you'll see STR's in the 12's with all we're doing.
 

Last edited by bfsgross; 06-09-2012 at 08:27 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Robinb (06-09-2012)


Quick Reply: 2006 S-Type-R



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 AM.