S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Can you run regular in a S-type R?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #141  
Old 07-13-2011 | 05:36 AM
Staatsof's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,110
Likes: 220
From: No. NJ
Default

Originally Posted by jagv8
If you can get a tech who works in the computer part of Jaguar to let us know (and for each of the PCMs), that would be useful. Realistically no-one else is likely to know for sure, though they may have an opinion.

The idea of putting a fuel out of the stated specification into a performance car does strike me as crazy, whatever the answer as to what the PCMs will do.
I'm not going to step back into the debate about whether you should or should not be substituting a lower octane fuel on a regular (no pun intended) basis but it does occur to me that since the engine has knock sensors I'd be very surprised if it couldn't properly adjust itself for such an an occasion when someone can't get or decides to substitute a lower octane fuel. Given how often I hear the supercharger whine when I drive mine I think I'd be cheating myself of the very best performance of the car.
 
  #142  
Old 07-13-2011 | 05:50 AM
Staatsof's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,110
Likes: 220
From: No. NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Count Iblis
I thought about this long and hard. The AJ27 S/C comes with a lower CR than the NA 10.75:1 CR. In addition- at low load- which is in traffic and lower speeds the M112 supercharger is running on bypass and running no boost (this addresses the false claim that the engine is always running boost- at part load not only is it throttled but the SC is bypassed) and considered that it may be possible to run low octane. Then a flash of memory came back from 12 years ago and my Whitley development days in Coventry.I made a long distance call to an old friend/mentor from my Jag development days. I seem to recall some cars coming back from South Africa with badly nibbled pistons.
The knock sensing has a limit and beyond a certain point will no longer retard anymore.
It IS true, knock is far worse at Full load conditions but the S/C Jag engines are knock limited at some points at loads/BMEPs as low as 3 bar! Add to that that under the conditions where it is knock limited and running on 87 octane- the engine will be running alot less efficiently. After considering all of this I decided to continue running 93 octane
The points you're raise is exactly why one should consult the manufacturer's opinion on this matter. They did all the development testing of the engine and know how close to the limits it gets under all the conditions the car might encounter. Finding someone who will give you a straight, fully informed answer and not just read it out of the owners manual is what we really want here. But I can't imagine anyone at Jaguar officially suggesting that it's OK to substitute a lower octane fuel even if were feasible.

In any event, I have a very nice topic to completely ruin the jovial atmosphere one should be experiencing at an annual car club picnic!

Wish me luck.
 
  #143  
Old 07-13-2011 | 06:26 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 26,851
Likes: 4,578
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

Don't ruin it! We've had a good enough answer above from Count Iblis about the AJ27 SC which is near enough the STR. He says it (the PCM) does have knock limits. You're not going to find out exactly what they are. You'd be lucky to find out something as accurate let alone from someone actually in the know.
 
  #144  
Old 07-13-2011 | 08:15 AM
Staatsof's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,110
Likes: 220
From: No. NJ
Default

Thank you for the directive ...

None the less, I found portions of his statements confusing. 3 bar? That would be just north of 29lbs of boost above normal atmospheric pressure. I didn't think this SC system boosted that high? Am I wrong about this? Perhaps he could flesh his statements out a bit to clarify things a bit more.
 
  #145  
Old 07-13-2011 | 09:02 AM
Norri's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 118,028
Likes: 6,388
From: PHX some of the time
Default

It's not boost pressure that he means it is Brake Mean Effective Pressure, don't ask me to explain it though.
Maybe Count Iblis will explain for us?
 
  #146  
Old 07-13-2011 | 09:11 AM
Staatsof's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Veteran Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,110
Likes: 220
From: No. NJ
Default

That would be great.
 
  #147  
Old 07-13-2011 | 09:46 AM
JOsworth's Avatar
Veteran member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,390
Likes: 194
From: Akron, Ohio USA
Default

Originally Posted by Count Iblis
It IS true, knock is far worse at Full load conditions but the S/C Jag engines are knock limited at some points at loads/BMEPs as low as 3 bar! Add to that that under the conditions where it is knock limited and running on 87 octane- the engine will be running alot less efficiently. After considering all of this I decided to continue running 93 octane
Originally Posted by jagv8
With where he lives it will be 93 AKI I think, whereas only 91 is needed (for the S-Type R) I understand. 93 is likely harmless but I suspect also pointless. (Oh what have I said......)

edit: added (for the S-Type R) - the relevant poster (Count I) has an XJR
Originally Posted by jorge911
So he decided to continue with 93 octane... but is that 93AKI or 93RON?

In any case my manual recommends 95RON which is what I put

Thanks,

Jorge.
(By the way, and here comes the misleading, 95RON y "regular" in Spain so I'm not putting "premium" but that is only a relative and misleading word, we should stop using the words "regular" and "premium" and use only what is really important the octane number using RON or AKI)
Yes.... Octane is the term we should be using. The loose definitions of "Premium, Regular, Mid-Grade" vary from country to country.

When I moved to the Chrysler, and got my hands on a hand held tuner, I got a little lesson in the limits of the PCM myself. See, just like Count Iblis talked about, There are limits that the computer works in. If you take the PCM in the Hemi and reprogram it for 91 or 93 octane fuel (it is designed to run on 89 octane) you get a warning from the tuning company that YOU WILL damage the engine if you run lower octane because the knock sensors will not be able to compensate enough to prevent knock damage. Conversely, they also write "economy" tunes for the car to run at lower power with 87 octane. They also tell you that going up in octane will not hurt anything but will also be a waste of money. So, again, it really becomes a matter of the PCM computer's limitations to handle extreme changes. I really wish for you guys that the Jaguar engines had the support out there to have a company produce a hand held tuner. It is one of the neatest things I've ever gotten for a car. I have played with everything from 87 octane to 93 octane. The power the car produces when tuned to 93 octane is awesome, but it makes it almost to powerful. The drive is more high strung. The best I've found is 91 octane tune, with some of the throttle response dialed back (yes you can adjust that along with a ton of other stuff).

I know that a bunch of that is not relevant to the Jaguar discussion. My point is, yet again, I think people over estimate the actual ability of the computers in their cars to compensate for things out of "specification".
 
  #148  
Old 07-13-2011 | 09:49 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 26,851
Likes: 4,578
From: Yorkshire, England
Default

Good stuff about bmep in wiki etc - good if you can understand it
 
  #149  
Old 07-13-2011 | 02:21 PM
Mikey's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,058
Likes: 2,266
From: Perth Ontario Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Count Iblis
I seem to recall some cars coming back from South Africa with badly nibbled pistons.
The knock sensing has a limit and beyond a certain point will no longer retard anymore.
It IS true, knock is far worse at Full load conditions but the S/C Jag engines are knock limited at some points at loads/BMEPs as low as 3 bar! Add to that that under the conditions where it is knock limited and running on 87 octane- the engine will be running alot less efficiently. After considering all of this I decided to continue running 93 octane
This post contains interesting info, albeit with all due respect, some of it is anecdotal. It does seem to confirm that yes, the spark will be retarded to avoid detonation but raises the question of what the resulting lower limit for gasoline octane rating would be. Without know more about the petrol used in S.Africa on what engine in which car, it is similar to the chart previously provided for the 4.2L powered Land Rover products that indicate that 87AKI octane gas is acceptable.

And around and around we go..
 
  #150  
Old 07-13-2011 | 05:55 PM
maxthrottle's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 238
Likes: 33
From: Souderton, PA
Default

Feed the kitty the best gas you can find (other than the 100LL at the airport, now that's real gas, should sell it as perfume.) I've noticed a difference between 91 and 93 octane in the STR
 
  #151  
Old 07-14-2011 | 07:02 AM
Leedsman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 976
Likes: 69
From: Leeds, UK.
Default

BMEP, Brake Mean Effective Pressure:
For those unfamiliar with the integral calculus used often to describe this, BMEP can best be said to be the combustion pressure averaged out over the cycle. It is the indicated mean effective pressure minus the friction, most of which occurs between piston/rings and cylinder wall during power stroke due to the sideways thrust from the conrod/crankpin assy.
For a plain aspirated petrol engine, something like 10bar would be typical, for a turbo or supercharged engine, say up to 15bar, depending on the boost pressure. Typically, turbo/supercharged engines have to have compression ratio reduced to stop knock-ping due to increased compression pressure, greatest at full throttle of course. One of the reasons pressure-charged petrol engines are less fuel-efficient. The diesel situation is completely different.
Leedsman.
 
The following users liked this post:
Staatsof (07-14-2011)
  #152  
Old 07-14-2011 | 07:40 AM
JamesWalker's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 3
From: Franconia, NH
Default You'll save the difference in better mileage

A few years ago my wife drove an A3 withthe 2.0 turbo and I had a V8 Touareg. Both require premium. I always put in 91 or 93. She was frugal and always put in 87. So I tested a tank of 87 against a tank of 91. The premium fuel produced 10% better MILEAGE in addition, of course, to better performance. So, back in those days that was about $0.25 a gallon, now it's about $0.38 a gallon difference. It pays for itself.
 
  #153  
Old 11-07-2011 | 05:09 PM
steadicam's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 84
Likes: 3
From: Northern California
Default

I have been running both in my STR and have seen zero difference in the milage between premium and regular on my test loop 63 miles (mixed highway, full throttle blasts, and city) I was sure I would see some kinda difference if nothing more than a few tenths of a mile but it was the same. As for knocking the has been none, I would expect that as the supercharger spools up that there would be some pinging but unless the knock sensor has psychic abilities i have not even heard a single knock, I of course would run only the best fro the car but i really cannot detect a difference. When I get a chance I am gonna hook up the wds and see if I can get some real time data.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trosty
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
26
12-18-2022 07:40 PM
sogood
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
9
09-15-2015 08:35 AM
Doovoe
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
8
09-08-2015 06:42 PM
pocketrocket
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
9
09-03-2015 08:44 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Can you run regular in a S-type R?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 PM.