Decided on an STR and after your considered opinions.....
#21
#22
#24
#25
Parts cost -- Jaguar.
Actually, you CAN get parts much cheaper than the dealer prices, but you have to work at it, check around. Parts can be half the dealer price this way.
It's a bit like car insurance, shop around and again, swinging cuts can be made. But this is like retail anywhere. In Leeds market, I bought X-mas puddings at £1 each. Then I found another stall in the same market selling the identical X-mas puddings at TWO for a £1.
Quod erat desperandum.
Leedsman.
It's a bit like car insurance, shop around and again, swinging cuts can be made. But this is like retail anywhere. In Leeds market, I bought X-mas puddings at £1 each. Then I found another stall in the same market selling the identical X-mas puddings at TWO for a £1.
Quod erat desperandum.
Leedsman.
#26
Best STR year model as a base for future upgrades
Let's see if I can't breathe some new life into an old thread. I am beginning my hunt in earnest for a low-mileage (50K mi.) STR. I am interested in the S/C upgrades and would plan on performing one of these in the near future.
That said, what is the best year to start with bearing these parameters in mind. I would generally want to buy the latest year of a given model but in the this case I am not sure if changes in the drive line were made along the way which might make an earlier car more desirable than a later car or if there was one particular year model that has better brakes, etc.
I have been digging through the site for the last few days and am finding out a lot about these ares and I will be in need of a new car in the next month so after some research I've settled on the STR. Being a hot-rodder at heart however just means that a new car is merely a starting point. I've been driving an AMG C55 for the last few years (0-60 in 4.7) so I do enjoy a car with a little oooomph.
Let's hear what you experts have to say.
Thanks in advance,
-Robert
That said, what is the best year to start with bearing these parameters in mind. I would generally want to buy the latest year of a given model but in the this case I am not sure if changes in the drive line were made along the way which might make an earlier car more desirable than a later car or if there was one particular year model that has better brakes, etc.
I have been digging through the site for the last few days and am finding out a lot about these ares and I will be in need of a new car in the next month so after some research I've settled on the STR. Being a hot-rodder at heart however just means that a new car is merely a starting point. I've been driving an AMG C55 for the last few years (0-60 in 4.7) so I do enjoy a car with a little oooomph.
Let's hear what you experts have to say.
Thanks in advance,
-Robert
#27
Only way to get decent more power is a twin-screw as member Avos has done so find which PCM can be tuned. Most can't be, simply because it's a very small market so mostly it hasn't been attempted.
Doesn't matter what you do with suspension, brakes etc if you can't fit a TS and tune. You'd be stuck with the M112 and its just about at its end anyway.
Doesn't matter what you do with suspension, brakes etc if you can't fit a TS and tune. You'd be stuck with the M112 and its just about at its end anyway.
The following users liked this post:
quark_boy (10-22-2014)
#29
Definitely looking to do the twin-screw S/C
Thanks for the feedback guys. The twin-screw S/C is exactly what I have in mind. Because of the power potential I see in this mod. I am curious to know what the members feel is the best starting point.
With the understanding that my goal is to buy a low-mileage car and install one of the twin-screw units, what year would you guys vote for as being the best starting point? Are the earlier transmissions more up to task than the later ones? Are the brakes throughout the whole production run essentially the same?
Another way to ask this question would be, in order, what would start to break if BHP was increased by 100 (at the flywheel)? Looking for some good feedback here. My goal is to buy a driving project car as a daily commuter so I want to maintain reliability while increasing my smiles/mile.
Thanks guys.
-Robert
With the understanding that my goal is to buy a low-mileage car and install one of the twin-screw units, what year would you guys vote for as being the best starting point? Are the earlier transmissions more up to task than the later ones? Are the brakes throughout the whole production run essentially the same?
Another way to ask this question would be, in order, what would start to break if BHP was increased by 100 (at the flywheel)? Looking for some good feedback here. My goal is to buy a driving project car as a daily commuter so I want to maintain reliability while increasing my smiles/mile.
Thanks guys.
-Robert
#30
#31
I don't care for the body style but a 500+HP XFR is how much in the used market? I drove this and a similar XJ a few years ago at a Jaguar track event and they really are quite an improvement over an STR. It might be cheaper in the long run and survive the bump in power better if you can stomach the styling. The STR is just so lovely.
The following users liked this post:
quark_boy (10-23-2014)
#33
Let's see if I can't breathe some new life into an old thread. I am beginning my hunt in earnest for a low-mileage (50K mi.) STR. I am interested in the S/C upgrades and would plan on performing one of these in the near future. That said, what is the best year to start with bearing these parameters in mind. I would generally want to buy the latest year of a given model but in the this case I am not sure if changes in the drive line were made along the way which might make an earlier car more desirable than a later car or if there was one particular year model that has better brakes, etc. I have been digging through the site for the last few days and am finding out a lot about these ares and I will be in need of a new car in the next month so after some research I've settled on the STR. Being a hot-rodder at heart however just means that a new car is merely a starting point. I've been driving an AMG C55 for the last few years (0-60 in 4.7) so I do enjoy a car with a little oooomph. Let's hear what you experts have to say. Thanks in advance, -Robert
Last edited by rasputin; 10-23-2014 at 03:31 PM.
The following users liked this post:
quark_boy (10-23-2014)
#34
I don't care for the body style but a 500+HP XFR is how much in the used market? I drove this and a similar XJ a few years ago at a Jaguar track event and they really are quite an improvement over an STR. It might be cheaper in the long run and survive the bump in power better if you can stomach the styling. The STR is just so lovely.
I parked my STR next to an XF once, and the choice was easy! I still lust after that 5.0 SC though, but again, if you could only get over the looks. XJR might be the better of the two.
The following users liked this post:
quark_boy (10-23-2014)
#35
Surely some years must be better than others...
Thanks for all the feedback, guys. I had considered an XF but it is just not nearly as handsome as an S Type. I have also looked at other makes and models including another Benz or another BMW. I've owned several of each and had fun modifying them (including a Five Series and my current turbocharged monster 3.0CSL) and because I always liked the styling of the classic Jag saloons, I became drawn to the STR.
AFA getting year model specific recommendations I have not yet gotten a single recommendation for one year over another.
Surely there must be certain years of these cars that have better reputations than others or did Jaguar get it right every single year of the production run? I'd find that hard to believe.
Let's hear your votes!
Thanks, all.
-Robert
AFA getting year model specific recommendations I have not yet gotten a single recommendation for one year over another.
Surely there must be certain years of these cars that have better reputations than others or did Jaguar get it right every single year of the production run? I'd find that hard to believe.
Let's hear your votes!
Thanks, all.
-Robert
#36
My understanding is that the 2003-2005 STR have the big Brembo brakes up front, while the 2005+ models had a number of Jag mods, possible improvements(?). So, that would suggest 2005 could be the year of choice.
Avos has indicated a power increase of between 100 - 200 HP with the twin-screw S/C, depending on how many options you build in during conversion. It also seems that you will need professional help and, for max HP, could be looking at maybe $25-30,000 by the time the dust settles. I don't know whether or not that includes an LSD.
But then, you would have a 600HP STR! That thought keeps me awake at night.
Avos has indicated a power increase of between 100 - 200 HP with the twin-screw S/C, depending on how many options you build in during conversion. It also seems that you will need professional help and, for max HP, could be looking at maybe $25-30,000 by the time the dust settles. I don't know whether or not that includes an LSD.
But then, you would have a 600HP STR! That thought keeps me awake at night.
The following users liked this post:
quark_boy (10-24-2014)
#37
The 2005 "improvements" were cosmetic - if you like the tweaked looks better.
There were also some extra emissions-related changes whose complexity adds a small risk of new faults (some of which have bitten members).
Tuning is the big issue. Year, mileage, etc simply don't come into it except in that context. If you can't go TS and tune then you're never going to get even 450HP except briefly if you add nitrous.
There were also some extra emissions-related changes whose complexity adds a small risk of new faults (some of which have bitten members).
Tuning is the big issue. Year, mileage, etc simply don't come into it except in that context. If you can't go TS and tune then you're never going to get even 450HP except briefly if you add nitrous.
The following users liked this post:
quark_boy (10-24-2014)
#38
Tuning is definitely the issue...
and part of the appeal. I like the idea of having something less than common. There are tuned BMWs and MBs all over the place. A big horse Jaguar would make a nice sleeper.
I'm going to look deeper in to the changes made along the line and see if that helps to inform by decision.
I'll keep y'all posted.
Thanks for all the feedback so far. I'm still interested in more opinions. My ears are on
-Robert
I'm going to look deeper in to the changes made along the line and see if that helps to inform by decision.
I'll keep y'all posted.
Thanks for all the feedback so far. I'm still interested in more opinions. My ears are on
-Robert
#39
If you get a 2003 or 2004 be sure and drive it. The early STR's are known for short shifting. My 2005 has always went all the way to redline about 6100 rpm.
Since I have a 2005 that is the year I think is best. Last year of the Brembo's and no short shifting.
We never did find out why but it has been reported enough that it is a problem.
If you want a car to mod a CTS-V can be taken as high as you want in HP. Of course it's a Chevy motor but it does run strong. The 556 HP SC version would be my choice.
.
.
.
Since I have a 2005 that is the year I think is best. Last year of the Brembo's and no short shifting.
We never did find out why but it has been reported enough that it is a problem.
If you want a car to mod a CTS-V can be taken as high as you want in HP. Of course it's a Chevy motor but it does run strong. The 556 HP SC version would be my choice.
.
.
.
The following users liked this post:
quark_boy (10-24-2014)
#40
AFA getting year model specific recommendations I have not yet gotten a single recommendation for one year over another.
Surely there must be certain years of these cars that have better reputations than others or did Jaguar get it right every single year of the production run? I'd find that hard to believe.
Surely there must be certain years of these cars that have better reputations than others or did Jaguar get it right every single year of the production run? I'd find that hard to believe.
The S-Type was already 4 years old in 2003, so the kinks were fixed for that years' models. If I got another STR, I would get another '03-04, but that is just subjective on my part, the whole run through '08 was solid. My STR was a late 2002 build, and it stood up to massive abuse without a hiccup.