Did spark plug change on STR, and found a big surprise!
#41
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,263 Likes
on
1,845 Posts
#42
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
100K. It's consistent with both jag and Denso recommendations and there are technical articles about why. Please post your detailed evidence (not opinion) about why.
The following users liked this post:
jag79 (03-27-2011)
#43
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Damon /Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,254
Received 2,192 Likes
on
1,358 Posts
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
first its hard to foul IR and platinums compared to conventional, they last longer and much less prone to fouling in my experiance. Also I think you getting too worried needlessly at this point. Change the plugs, run them for 10k miles and pull them out and look again. Yes theres some oil(more normal for SC/Turbo cars) and ash deposits. Yes there alot of crap added and taken out of todays gas in addition to gas samples Ive seen with over 10% ethanol. Keep your oil changed regularly, run supreme on SC engines and have alook in 10k and THEN see what you have on the fresh plugs.
As for your cats, normally missfires/rich mixes are what take them out prematurely. Not octane or gas issues that Ive seen...
As for your cats, normally missfires/rich mixes are what take them out prematurely. Not octane or gas issues that Ive seen...
The following users liked this post:
jag79 (03-27-2011)
#44
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It was brought up as worth noting. In addition, some reasons for the difference were proposed.
No where was reader *told* that they *must* do anything different from whatever turns their crank. If anyone wants to run try to run their plugs to 1,000,000 miles they are free to do so. If they want to use Krazy Glue instead of anti-seize, they are free to do so.
If everyone *must* do as their Jaguar marketing organisation tells them, then US owners *must* change plugs at 100,000 miles and UK owners *must* change plugs at 30,000 miles. Same engine, same plugs, same gas.
The question then becomes why are the recommendations different and whether US or UK(+ROW) owners are better served.
100K ... there are technical articles about why.
Please post your detailed evidence (not opinion) about why.
Last edited by plums; 03-27-2011 at 01:44 AM.
#45
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That is not what was said.
What was said is that there is an interesting anomaly in a Jaguar publication.
What was also said or at least implied is that an adequate spark may not be a satisfactory spark for a particular owner or purpose.
Given what you know, how many hours of engine time does the FAA or DOT allow for plugs in piston engine planes? The interesting thing about planes is that pulling over to the shoulder and waiting for a tow truck is usually not a good option.
The following users liked this post:
jag79 (03-27-2011)
#46
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think we've heard all sides of this, there's plenty of information to consider, and like oil change intervals, spark plug changes should be placed up there with it, although I think the types of plugs can have a little more science involved in their support or opposition.
There are many opinions, and logical arguments for the various debates, and sharing them with the respect for all others, is what we all need. Thank you guys for your input...take a deep breath, and exhale. Feels better, doesn't it.
There are many opinions, and logical arguments for the various debates, and sharing them with the respect for all others, is what we all need. Thank you guys for your input...take a deep breath, and exhale. Feels better, doesn't it.
The following users liked this post:
jag79 (03-27-2011)
#47
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,263 Likes
on
1,845 Posts
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
For the OP- has there been any unexplained loss of coolant? I've got 5 or 6 engine geek buddies following this thread, this is one of the suggested causes for the weird deposits.
For plumsauce-
Neither the FAA nor Transport Canada (not DOT) sets any replacement interval for components. That's a common misconception, but is not how the industry works. The OEM develops the interval based on solid engineering and testing principles using well established procedures and methods. The OEM presents the equivalent of a thesis to the regulatory agency in their home country for examination and approval. Once an initial basic interval is set, field data is used to confirm that the interval is appropriate or possibly can be extended.
I know that the auto industry does not certify products to the same standards via the same methods but the feedback loop with respect to reliability and durability is still there.
I was always amazed by owners who 'knew better' than the OEM with respect to the above and would farque things up royally and then submit a warranty claim hoping that we would pay. Again, this is getting way off topic. If you're interested in pursuing the discussion, maybe start a new thread?
For plumsauce-
Neither the FAA nor Transport Canada (not DOT) sets any replacement interval for components. That's a common misconception, but is not how the industry works. The OEM develops the interval based on solid engineering and testing principles using well established procedures and methods. The OEM presents the equivalent of a thesis to the regulatory agency in their home country for examination and approval. Once an initial basic interval is set, field data is used to confirm that the interval is appropriate or possibly can be extended.
I know that the auto industry does not certify products to the same standards via the same methods but the feedback loop with respect to reliability and durability is still there.
I was always amazed by owners who 'knew better' than the OEM with respect to the above and would farque things up royally and then submit a warranty claim hoping that we would pay. Again, this is getting way off topic. If you're interested in pursuing the discussion, maybe start a new thread?
#48
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
FFS. If you want to read it do some googling for Denso iridium spark plugs.
Maybe you found a bug.
Last edited by JagV8; 03-27-2011 at 10:06 AM.
#49
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Damon /Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,254
Received 2,192 Likes
on
1,358 Posts
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Smile](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#50
#51
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
For the OP- has there been any unexplained loss of coolant? I've got 5 or 6 engine geek buddies following this thread, this is one of the suggested causes for the weird deposits.
For plumsauce-
Neither the FAA nor Transport Canada (not DOT) sets any replacement interval for components. That's a common misconception, but is not how the industry works. The OEM develops the interval based on solid engineering and testing principles using well established procedures and methods. The OEM presents the equivalent of a thesis to the regulatory agency in their home country for examination and approval. Once an initial basic interval is set, field data is used to confirm that the interval is appropriate or possibly can be extended.
I know that the auto industry does not certify products to the same standards via the same methods but the feedback loop with respect to reliability and durability is still there.
I was always amazed by owners who 'knew better' than the OEM with respect to the above and would farque things up royally and then submit a warranty claim hoping that we would pay. Again, this is getting way off topic. If you're interested in pursuing the discussion, maybe start a new thread?
For plumsauce-
Neither the FAA nor Transport Canada (not DOT) sets any replacement interval for components. That's a common misconception, but is not how the industry works. The OEM develops the interval based on solid engineering and testing principles using well established procedures and methods. The OEM presents the equivalent of a thesis to the regulatory agency in their home country for examination and approval. Once an initial basic interval is set, field data is used to confirm that the interval is appropriate or possibly can be extended.
I know that the auto industry does not certify products to the same standards via the same methods but the feedback loop with respect to reliability and durability is still there.
I was always amazed by owners who 'knew better' than the OEM with respect to the above and would farque things up royally and then submit a warranty claim hoping that we would pay. Again, this is getting way off topic. If you're interested in pursuing the discussion, maybe start a new thread?
Cheers!
![Icon Toast](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_toast.gif)
Last edited by jag79; 03-27-2011 at 03:39 PM.
#52
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have just been on the phone to the tech dept. at NGK here in AUS.
They told me the plugs that last 100,000km are the 'double iridium' type not the single iridium ones; BKR5EIX11 being single iridium IX. The single ones have a recommended interval of 'only' 60,000km.
Also NGK do a slightly lesser plug; a 'OE Laser Iridium" to fit the STR.
I am not sure if there if there is a 'double iridium' to suit the STR.
AND I am not sure if the original JAGUAR branded plugs (C2A1535) are really one of the above NGKs with just Jaguar written on the plug.
Anyhow due to a deteriorating poor idle, I had to change all the eight points. The condition was so bad the engine was nearly stalling; at idle (in gear). Also with poor take of.
Probably not all points would have needed changing but the dealer never changes just one or two, all 8 are usually changed.
I was also told by the dealer to change all the plugs as well, as bad points usually foul the plugs! Even though these plugs had done nowhere near 60,000km.
Odometer reading on vehicle: 68,000km.
They told me the plugs that last 100,000km are the 'double iridium' type not the single iridium ones; BKR5EIX11 being single iridium IX. The single ones have a recommended interval of 'only' 60,000km.
Also NGK do a slightly lesser plug; a 'OE Laser Iridium" to fit the STR.
I am not sure if there if there is a 'double iridium' to suit the STR.
AND I am not sure if the original JAGUAR branded plugs (C2A1535) are really one of the above NGKs with just Jaguar written on the plug.
Anyhow due to a deteriorating poor idle, I had to change all the eight points. The condition was so bad the engine was nearly stalling; at idle (in gear). Also with poor take of.
Probably not all points would have needed changing but the dealer never changes just one or two, all 8 are usually changed.
I was also told by the dealer to change all the plugs as well, as bad points usually foul the plugs! Even though these plugs had done nowhere near 60,000km.
Odometer reading on vehicle: 68,000km.
#53
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have just been on the phone to the tech dept. at NGK here in AUS.
They told me the plugs that last 100,000km are the 'double iridium' type not the single iridium ones; BKR5EIX11 being single iridium IX. The single ones have a recommended interval of 'only' 60,000km.
Also NGK do a slightly lesser plug; a 'OE Laser Iridium" to fit the STR.
I am not sure if there if there is a 'double iridium' to suit the STR.
AND I am not sure if the original JAGUAR branded plugs (C2A1535) are really one of the above NGKs with just Jaguar written on the plug.
They told me the plugs that last 100,000km are the 'double iridium' type not the single iridium ones; BKR5EIX11 being single iridium IX. The single ones have a recommended interval of 'only' 60,000km.
Also NGK do a slightly lesser plug; a 'OE Laser Iridium" to fit the STR.
I am not sure if there if there is a 'double iridium' to suit the STR.
AND I am not sure if the original JAGUAR branded plugs (C2A1535) are really one of the above NGKs with just Jaguar written on the plug.
The construction of the NGK Iridium MAX is iridium center electrode with a platinum side electrode carrying a small iridium inlay. The part numbers are suffixed with "P" to differentiate from the NGK Iridium IX.
The NGK Iridium IX is what is generally available in North America.
100,000 kilometers = 62,137.12 statute miles
#54
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It appears that the ONLY place it says it is something YOU found. And it's out of date, if it indeed says what you claim.
#55
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I told you to google for Denso iridium spark plugs. Is that really so hard. No.
It's years out of date and has been superseded.
Last edited by JagV8; 03-28-2011 at 07:27 AM.
#56
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Looks like there has been a dyno test done comparing denso iridums vs. NGk iridiums and pulstar. YOu be the judge which is better, have a look, http://www.sparkplugs.com/sparkplug4...fid=0&KID=3147
#57
#58
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,263 Likes
on
1,845 Posts
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Looks like there has been a dyno test done comparing denso iridums vs. NGk iridiums and pulstar. YOu be the judge which is better, have a look, Sparkplugs.com - Spark Plug 411
A spark is a spark.
![Icon Couchhide](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_couchhide.gif)
#59
#60
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,263 Likes
on
1,845 Posts
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Icon Doh](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/icon_doh.gif)
I think you've misunderstood what 'hot' and 'cold' plugs are for.