S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

At dyno now (PTuning)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 10-10-2012, 09:34 AM
Michael Star's Avatar
Veteran member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 2,327
Received 251 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1320racer
Cambo351,

Thanks for the suggestion as we are all in the same boat in the search for more power.

I searched and read through threads this morning regarding the boring of the throttle body from 75mm to ~80-81mm. I likely missed something since I did not see the cost or dyno results showing this modification is actually worth doing.

I went back to the stock cats because the hi-flow cats failed.
Usually you can expect 3-4hp across the powerband. Not really that much for the cost.
 
The following users liked this post:
1320racer (10-10-2012)
  #22  
Old 10-10-2012, 09:52 AM
Ingo's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 245
Received 36 Likes on 33 Posts
  #23  
Old 10-10-2012, 09:56 AM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,453 Likes on 2,426 Posts
Default

1320racer, have you done the intake elbow as well? That was dyno proven for 10-12HP
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/s...e6/#post519314

Regarding the Maxbore, it's $120 for the service plus shipping (and your time). Even if that only gets you 5HP it's still a cheap mod.
 
  #24  
Old 10-10-2012, 10:03 AM
Michael Star's Avatar
Veteran member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 2,327
Received 251 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ingo
Ya but no dynos to prove it. Kinda like the ECU tunes, people promise a lot, but can't prove anything.
 
  #25  
Old 10-10-2012, 11:12 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,738
Received 4,516 Likes on 3,927 Posts
Default

Frankly I don't believe it. The Eaton is known as Heaton with good cause.
 
  #26  
Old 10-10-2012, 11:32 AM
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,295
Received 251 Likes on 169 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Michael Star
Ya but no dynos to prove it. Kinda like the ECU tunes, people promise a lot, but can't prove anything.
End of the day, the eaton can only flow so much air. This is evident when you look at any of the upgraded pulley dyno graphs posted. They make more power around peak torque, but by redline, they've run out of steam, and are making more or less the same power as without a pulley.
At best, vendors will advertise 'peak' gains, but one glance at the dyno sheet goes to show you those benefits are isolated to mid-range/torque numbers.

1320racer's observations are right on the money when describing his 2.6lb pulley upgrade; he says, "the smaller 2.6 inch pulley helped just a bit when launching but diminished top end horse power...

We can make small gains through efficiency improvements (read: how the motor breathes), otherwise, any substantial gains require pushing MORE AIR, which just isn't going to happen on the already maxed out factory Eaton supercharger.

Same goes for chips/tune's on mostly stock STR's. A/F ratio is a *bit* on the rich side when stock, but the A/F traces on modified dyno sheets appears to have little to no room to lean it out more safely, and even then, gains through A/F tweaks at that point are minimal. Ignition timing is trickier and dependent on fueling too, and the factory computer seems to do a good job optimizing at it as is. Theres no such thing as to keep throwing timing at it and it will keep making more power on a given fuel. Eventually, you hit the 'right' timing profile and that is it.
 

Last edited by GT42R; 10-10-2012 at 11:35 AM.
  #27  
Old 10-10-2012, 11:52 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,738
Received 4,516 Likes on 3,927 Posts
Default

+1 (an alternative being cooler air, so better intercooling etc)
 
  #28  
Old 10-10-2012, 12:30 PM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Avos, you felt a 90mm TB was needed to support your 600+ chp 4.2 w/TS?
 

Last edited by bfsgross; 10-10-2012 at 12:32 PM.
  #29  
Old 10-10-2012, 01:18 PM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,616
Received 1,065 Likes on 760 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bfsgross
Avos, you felt a 90mm TB was needed to support your 600+ chp 4.2 w/TS?
It certainly helps.
 
  #30  
Old 10-10-2012, 01:43 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,453 Likes on 2,426 Posts
Default

Larger throttle bodies are a standard aftermarket performance item for other makes, just a few example for Fords;

Mammoth Supercharger

Ford BA-BF V8 Big Mouth Throttle Body Performance Automotive Enhancements

Check the prices from SS Inductions in Oz, $675 for an 80mm TB (stock being 75mm) and Maxbore does it for $120 or so....
 
  #31  
Old 10-10-2012, 01:56 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,738
Received 4,516 Likes on 3,927 Posts
Default

hmm. What to do about the two TPSs?

Seems to me they make this very hard.
 
  #32  
Old 10-10-2012, 02:00 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,453 Likes on 2,426 Posts
Default

But i'm not saying fit the Kenne Bell or SS to the Jags, just to show that a bigger TB is a normal modification on modern mainstream V8 engines....

Two TPS? There is only one, & besides, we have found an aftermarket supplier of the OEM part!
 
  #33  
Old 10-10-2012, 02:19 PM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Wonder if a 90mm TB would "help" on our STR's as they presently sit?
 
  #34  
Old 10-10-2012, 02:48 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,738
Received 4,516 Likes on 3,927 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cambo351
But i'm not saying fit the Kenne Bell or SS to the Jags, just to show that a bigger TB is a normal modification on modern mainstream V8 engines....

Two TPS? There is only one, & besides, we have found an aftermarket supplier of the OEM part!
Er... wrong, surely? One TB, 2 TPSs. Used for safety. You can see them in the Electrical Guide as TP1 and TP2, in sich as fig 03.5
 
  #35  
Old 10-10-2012, 02:52 PM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,453 Likes on 2,426 Posts
Default

You mean one of these



It's two separate sensors in the one housing....
 
  #36  
Old 10-10-2012, 03:29 PM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,738
Received 4,516 Likes on 3,927 Posts
Default

So the bigger TB... does it have the same sensors as the OE TB? Or what? (The PCM needs to see the right signal from each, and they're different on purpose.)
 
  #37  
Old 10-10-2012, 11:55 PM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,616
Received 1,065 Likes on 760 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bfsgross
Wonder if a 90mm TB would "help" on our STR's as they presently sit?
Don't know, I would say it would be too expensive for what you can get out of the Eaton, as that is your main problem.

The boring out is cheap enough to do and will certainly help a little, but results will depend on how much more airflow you have over stock obvioulsy, and the TB is just part of the intake.
 
  #38  
Old 10-11-2012, 01:34 AM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,453 Likes on 2,426 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JagV8
So the bigger TB... does it have the same sensors as the OE TB? Or what? (The PCM needs to see the right signal from each, and they're different on purpose.)
That would be a question for Avos, since he is the only one who has fitted an non-OEM TB...I would guess that the OEM TPS needs to be mounted on the new TB.

What I was trying to explain, is that the factory TB at 75mm, can be modified to 80mm by Maxbore. That would be the same housing & TPS as original, so no compatibility problems, just more flow.

SS in Australia sells an aftermarket 80mm TB to replace the factory 75mm TB on the V8 Falcons, for $675. So it's an example of why the Maxbore looks like a good value proposition, and that a bigger TB is a sensible modification worth looking into, it is being done on other engines (& it's the next mod on my list).

A bigger TB, along with improved intake elbow (i.e. Qwiketz, Mafioso, etc) is going to be a winning combination.
 
  #39  
Old 10-11-2012, 01:59 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,738
Received 4,516 Likes on 3,927 Posts
Default

The Falcon doesn't use the same Denso PCM as the STR does it?
 
  #40  
Old 10-11-2012, 03:09 AM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,453 Likes on 2,426 Posts
Default

Unfortunately no, and Ford uses a different TCM for the ZF 6HP26 too, we can't use any of the fantastic aftermarket goodies the Aussies have...

But it is still a good example of what we should be aiming for....
 


Quick Reply: At dyno now (PTuning)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:24 AM.