Lowering an STR
#1
Lowering an STR
I have acquired a set of nearly new H & R lowering springs. I know my car would benefit from a spring refresh anyway but before I fit these I'd be interested to hear from anyone who has lowered an STR, especially using these springs, and what they thought of the results. From my limited research, it has no effect on electronic suspension.
#2
The following users liked this post:
User 42324 (12-17-2019)
#3
Your ‘2004 (facelift)' description is a bit confusing.
If it has the later facelift it is a 05MY year car. The vin number will tell you. If it is 41N***** at the end it is a 04MY pre-facelift car. If it is 51N***** it is an 05 (4.75) model year car.
The vin number change is given as N13089 onwards.
See my vin number details below for an example of a 05 (4.75) model year ‘facelift’ car that was built in early 2004.
My guess would be you also have a 05 (4.75) model year car that was built in 2004.
There is a 5mm difference in the ride height, the later cars were lower. See this official jaguar specifications book, the S-type ride heights you need are on PDF page 85 and 86.
http://www.jagrepair.com/images/Auto..._2007_2004.pdf
If it has the later facelift it is a 05MY year car. The vin number will tell you. If it is 41N***** at the end it is a 04MY pre-facelift car. If it is 51N***** it is an 05 (4.75) model year car.
The vin number change is given as N13089 onwards.
See my vin number details below for an example of a 05 (4.75) model year ‘facelift’ car that was built in early 2004.
My guess would be you also have a 05 (4.75) model year car that was built in 2004.
There is a 5mm difference in the ride height, the later cars were lower. See this official jaguar specifications book, the S-type ride heights you need are on PDF page 85 and 86.
http://www.jagrepair.com/images/Auto..._2007_2004.pdf
#4
It does get a bit confusing, as JLR releases different model years at different times in various markets; my 2003, X202, is a 2003 MY here in the States, but would be a 2002.5 in GB. With these cars the VIN is always the key for getting the correct parts and technical knowledge.
It would also helpful if you would indicate your general location in the world in your profile, thus not requiring the readers of the forum to "guess"...
It would also helpful if you would indicate your general location in the world in your profile, thus not requiring the readers of the forum to "guess"...
#5
Your ‘2004 (facelift)' description is a bit confusing.
If it has the later facelift it is a 05MY year car. The vin number will tell you. If it is 41N***** at the end it is a 04MY pre-facelift car. If it is 51N***** it is an 05 (4.75) model year car.
The vin number change is given as N13089 onwards.
See my vin number details below for an example of a 05 (4.75) model year ‘facelift’ car that was built in early 2004.
My guess would be you also have a 05 (4.75) model year car that was built in 2004.
There is a 5mm difference in the ride height, the later cars were lower. See this official jaguar specifications book, the S-type ride heights you need are on PDF page 85 and 86.
http://www.jagrepair.com/images/Auto..._2007_2004.pdf
If it has the later facelift it is a 05MY year car. The vin number will tell you. If it is 41N***** at the end it is a 04MY pre-facelift car. If it is 51N***** it is an 05 (4.75) model year car.
The vin number change is given as N13089 onwards.
See my vin number details below for an example of a 05 (4.75) model year ‘facelift’ car that was built in early 2004.
My guess would be you also have a 05 (4.75) model year car that was built in 2004.
There is a 5mm difference in the ride height, the later cars were lower. See this official jaguar specifications book, the S-type ride heights you need are on PDF page 85 and 86.
http://www.jagrepair.com/images/Auto..._2007_2004.pdf
#6
#7
It's one of my concerns too so it would be good to hear from anyone that has done it.
I'm happy enough with the ride and handling as standard but I've refreshed most of the suspension with the exception of the shocks and springs. With the car on 114K it's pretty certain the latter two items could do with replacement sooner rather than later. The H & R springs just fell into my lap along with a pair of much lower mileage shocks so that prompted me to do the job sooner rather than later. If I had waited I would almost certainly have stayed with standard.
I'm happy enough with the ride and handling as standard but I've refreshed most of the suspension with the exception of the shocks and springs. With the car on 114K it's pretty certain the latter two items could do with replacement sooner rather than later. The H & R springs just fell into my lap along with a pair of much lower mileage shocks so that prompted me to do the job sooner rather than later. If I had waited I would almost certainly have stayed with standard.
Trending Topics
#8
It's one of my concerns too so it would be good to hear from anyone that has done it.
I'm happy enough with the ride and handling as standard but I've refreshed most of the suspension with the exception of the shocks and springs. With the car on 114K it's pretty certain the latter two items could do with replacement sooner rather than later. The H & R springs just fell into my lap along with a pair of much lower mileage shocks so that prompted me to do the job sooner rather than later. If I had waited I would almost certainly have stayed with standard.
I'm happy enough with the ride and handling as standard but I've refreshed most of the suspension with the exception of the shocks and springs. With the car on 114K it's pretty certain the latter two items could do with replacement sooner rather than later. The H & R springs just fell into my lap along with a pair of much lower mileage shocks so that prompted me to do the job sooner rather than later. If I had waited I would almost certainly have stayed with standard.
I have an '05 STR and had H&R Springs added about two years ago with aprox. 60K on the odometer. My OEM springs were fine but for me the handling did not match the performance of the car. Bottom line is the car handles better, still rides comfortable but now in a more predictable manner, and looks better. It's probably the best mod I've done on the car and felt it should have come this way from Jaguar. The CATS shocks are very good and well integrated with the car so I would not touch those unless they are worn out. As far as speed bumps, you might have to slow more than you do now over the worst speed bumps as the car will sit lower. Crummy pic but the only one I could find quickly.
#9
#10
Wings -- firstly that car does look way nice and i love the ride hight .
+ you guys are so lucky to not have a front no# plate messing things up at the front .
it looks so clean .
though as stated above , nor would it clear our speed humps here , or the curbs around our car parks in NZ.
i have a 25mm rubber lip on my STR and it scrapes almost to the painted bumper on some driveways .
i have always wanted to close the Gape on my STR's arches .
but this rubber lip has made me too weary .
maybe mine has succumbed to saggy springs too?
these springs are stock.
+ you guys are so lucky to not have a front no# plate messing things up at the front .
it looks so clean .
though as stated above , nor would it clear our speed humps here , or the curbs around our car parks in NZ.
i have a 25mm rubber lip on my STR and it scrapes almost to the painted bumper on some driveways .
i have always wanted to close the Gape on my STR's arches .
but this rubber lip has made me too weary .
maybe mine has succumbed to saggy springs too?
these springs are stock.
Last edited by Datsports; 12-19-2019 at 04:41 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tee-eye
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
13
03-08-2013 04:01 PM
androulakis
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
14
02-04-2011 10:29 AM
androulakis
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
3
08-14-2010 10:56 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)