Meet me at the bar
#21
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,266 Likes
on
1,845 Posts
The video was a decent explanation of fundamental front suspension dynamics and does point out why double wishbone set ups suffer far less shock tower deflection than other types.
Two flaws to the discussion though
1) there is no evidence presented that the shock towers deflect towards each other in a sufficient amplitude to cause a negative effect in handling. More importantly and more likely in extreme manouevers, if the towers were to deflect in parallel, as one strut loads while the other unloads, a strut bar would have no effect.
2) the two strut bars he uses as props are curved somewhat like a bow and not straight. Compressive loads would simply cause them to deflect rather than transmitting the full force to the opposite tower.
Like curb feelers, lots of 'show' but little 'go'.
#23
#25
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,266 Likes
on
1,845 Posts
The problem therein is obtaining unbiased objective data. A double blind test would almost be required involving multiple sessions of before and after.
With most mods, people would rather believe their uncalibrated butt dyno which consistently tells them that no, they didn't just waste $200 on a widget. There's been recent discussions of adding cold air intakes on older XJ cars if you want to see this effect in action.
With most mods, people would rather believe their uncalibrated butt dyno which consistently tells them that no, they didn't just waste $200 on a widget. There's been recent discussions of adding cold air intakes on older XJ cars if you want to see this effect in action.
#27
#28
#30
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,266 Likes
on
1,845 Posts
The following users liked this post:
Busa (06-10-2016)
#31
Every now and then recent members make statements based on little knowledge about S-Types as if their previous sometimes sketchy knowledge is relevant to S-Types when it patently isn't. Members generally don't like to say "you are talking out of your @ss" and so we get threads like this. The new members generally haven't bothered to read existing threads or the many detailed technical documents that would have saved them the embarrassment of posting.
By way of ludicrous example, a recent member referred to carbs. Now when did a modern production road car last have carbs? 20+ years ago? 30+?
It's odd, really, because reading existing detailed info provides immediate knowledge and also points to things that DO work, whereas posting has a tendency to make them look lazy, often arrogant, idiots.
By way of ludicrous example, a recent member referred to carbs. Now when did a modern production road car last have carbs? 20+ years ago? 30+?
It's odd, really, because reading existing detailed info provides immediate knowledge and also points to things that DO work, whereas posting has a tendency to make them look lazy, often arrogant, idiots.
Last edited by JagV8; 06-10-2016 at 01:00 AM.
#33
#34
That is why I am not a fan of Harley Davidson's.
I think most people don't know that even on premium brands every compenent is still designed down to the very minimum cost.
Jaguar are no exception this.
Profit is the name of the game.
If you want a laugh, this site covers the very worst of British and some EU car modifications. I think Clarkson mentioned this site.
Barryboys.co.uk ? Index page
Barry is urban slang for chav.
Caution there might be some swearing on here. Not work safe.
Last edited by Busa; 06-10-2016 at 03:56 AM.
#35
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Perth Ontario Canada
Posts: 11,058
Received 2,266 Likes
on
1,845 Posts
The following users liked this post:
Jumpin' Jag Flash (06-10-2016)
#36
From a historical perspective, Jaguar significantly changed the front sub-frame and suspension during the gen I to gen II face lift. (2003) You can see differences in the attached images. My “online readings” indicate that they made the front end 10% stiffer. I presume part of this was to handle the STR engine, and to correct some sub-frame flex being passed onto the front suspension. If there was an issue with shock tower stiffness, I am sure Jaguar would have introduced a strut tower cross brace. As far as I can tell, the shock tower’s uni-body sheet metal stayed the same during the change.
The following users liked this post:
Jumpin' Jag Flash (06-10-2016)
#37
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 6 (0 members and 6 guests)