Radiator coolant tank level sensor
#1
#2
I believe that when it is immersed in coolant it keeps a ground circuit open....no light...if the coolant drops and it is dry, so to speak, it closes and completes the ground....light on....loose or corroded plug in or faulty sensor could cause a continually light.,.you could use an ohm meter to verify operation
The following users liked this post:
rgsaz (04-05-2019)
The following users liked this post:
rgsaz (04-05-2019)
#4
#5
when you have the radiator out, inspect the trans cooler lines really good.... especially the rubber to metal crimps....the sway bar bushings are a breeze to replace at the same time....if you decide to replace the rubber portion of the lines, there are some detailed posts on that job here on the forum...one i wrote up even....9 times out of 10 ,when you disturb those lines, they leak and you won't find out until start up
Last edited by scottjh9; 04-05-2019 at 08:27 PM. Reason: Addition
#6
All seriousness aside, can you see any details inside the wet portion of the sensor? Maybe a thin rod centered inside a hollow tube? Does the outer tube have drain holes? If so, the sensor probably operates on capacitance. The rod and tube form the anode and cathode. The coolant is the electrolyte. When the coolant is low, that changes the overall capacitance.
In theory, such a sensor should last forever unless a film accumulated or some debris got caught between the two pieces.
Just a guess. Offered for free, and worth every penny.
#7
Interesting question. However, there's only room in this forum for one guy who overthinks everything and tries to understand things that don't really matter. You're gonna have to knock me off my throne if you want to claim my title!
All seriousness aside, can you see any details inside the wet portion of the sensor? Maybe a thin rod centered inside a hollow tube? Does the outer tube have drain holes? If so, the sensor probably operates on capacitance. The rod and tube form the anode and cathode. The coolant is the electrolyte. When the coolant is low, that changes the overall capacitance.
In theory, such a sensor should last forever unless a film accumulated or some debris got caught between the two pieces.
Just a guess. Offered for free, and worth every penny.
All seriousness aside, can you see any details inside the wet portion of the sensor? Maybe a thin rod centered inside a hollow tube? Does the outer tube have drain holes? If so, the sensor probably operates on capacitance. The rod and tube form the anode and cathode. The coolant is the electrolyte. When the coolant is low, that changes the overall capacitance.
In theory, such a sensor should last forever unless a film accumulated or some debris got caught between the two pieces.
Just a guess. Offered for free, and worth every penny.
Trending Topics
#9
Aha, that makes sense, there are some wires inside the sensor! Bob
That is the detail I was looking for and thanks for the reply. That will help me with diagnosing the "little devil" Bob of Arizona
Interesting question. However, there's only room in this forum for one guy who overthinks everything and tries to understand things that don't really matter. You're gonna have to knock me off my throne if you want to claim my title!
All seriousness aside, can you see any details inside the wet portion of the sensor? Maybe a thin rod centered inside a hollow tube? Does the outer tube have drain holes? If so, the sensor probably operates on capacitance. The rod and tube form the anode and cathode. The coolant is the electrolyte. When the coolant is low, that changes the overall capacitance.
In theory, such a sensor should last forever unless a film accumulated or some debris got caught between the two pieces.
Just a guess. Offered for free, and worth every penny.
All seriousness aside, can you see any details inside the wet portion of the sensor? Maybe a thin rod centered inside a hollow tube? Does the outer tube have drain holes? If so, the sensor probably operates on capacitance. The rod and tube form the anode and cathode. The coolant is the electrolyte. When the coolant is low, that changes the overall capacitance.
In theory, such a sensor should last forever unless a film accumulated or some debris got caught between the two pieces.
Just a guess. Offered for free, and worth every penny.
#10
Got to thinking some more. The sensor in your first picture doesn't look big enough to work on capacitance. There has to be a fixed space between the two components.
My latest TheoryDuJour™, subject to wind direction and my medication levels, is a simple temperature sensor. When immersed in coolant, the temperature at the reservoir should be comparable to the reading at the engine.
Look at post #3 here, about halfway down, for a picture of the temperature sensors in the climate control system:
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/s...2/#post1714571
Does the tip of the coolant sensor look anything like that, with two wires in a shiny bead? If so, measure the resistance between the two contacts. Is it anything like 30,000 ohms at 77F? Apparently that is a standard for automotive temperature sensors. There's a chart with that picture at the link above.
I've looked all the training guides at Jagrepair.com, but none had any details of the coolant level sensor. I tried other models, too, but no joy.
Back to that crackpot capacitance theory, which is SO yesterday. Commercial aviation fuel quantity indication uses capacitance probes. Jet fuel always has a little bit of water in it, and it can throw off the quantity indication if a drop of water bridges the two halves of a probe. This would typically happen right after fueling, when the flight was ready to go. On the L1011 (giving away my age), the probes (a dozen or so per tank) were suspended from access plates on the top of the wing. For erratic quantity indication, the service manual instructed you to strike each access plate with a massive rubber hammer. This would knock the water droplet loose and the indication would return to normal. Talk about some strange looks from the passengers, though...
My latest TheoryDuJour™, subject to wind direction and my medication levels, is a simple temperature sensor. When immersed in coolant, the temperature at the reservoir should be comparable to the reading at the engine.
Look at post #3 here, about halfway down, for a picture of the temperature sensors in the climate control system:
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/s...2/#post1714571
Does the tip of the coolant sensor look anything like that, with two wires in a shiny bead? If so, measure the resistance between the two contacts. Is it anything like 30,000 ohms at 77F? Apparently that is a standard for automotive temperature sensors. There's a chart with that picture at the link above.
I've looked all the training guides at Jagrepair.com, but none had any details of the coolant level sensor. I tried other models, too, but no joy.
Back to that crackpot capacitance theory, which is SO yesterday. Commercial aviation fuel quantity indication uses capacitance probes. Jet fuel always has a little bit of water in it, and it can throw off the quantity indication if a drop of water bridges the two halves of a probe. This would typically happen right after fueling, when the flight was ready to go. On the L1011 (giving away my age), the probes (a dozen or so per tank) were suspended from access plates on the top of the wing. For erratic quantity indication, the service manual instructed you to strike each access plate with a massive rubber hammer. This would knock the water droplet loose and the indication would return to normal. Talk about some strange looks from the passengers, though...
#11
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Crossroads of America
Posts: 19,581
Received 13,205 Likes
on
6,553 Posts
Hi Bob,
I'd have to dig a spare X350 reservoir out of the storage shed to confirm this, but I recall that the sensor is a reed switch. It is activated by a floating magnetic ring that rides on the outside of a cylinder molded into the reservoir. The magnet/float is in contact with the coolant and rises and falls with coolant level. The sensor/switch fits up into the inside of the cylinder and is not in contact with coolant. The sensor/switch is normally open. When the magnet floats at a level above the switch, the circuit remains open. When the coolant level falls, the magnet does likewise and activates the reed switch, triggering the Low Coolant warning lamp.
Here's a document I found with a quick search that explains the reed switch operation:
Littlefuse Reed Switch Coolant Level Sensor
This video shows the floating magnetic ring in a cut-open GM reservoir:
Cheers,
Don
I'd have to dig a spare X350 reservoir out of the storage shed to confirm this, but I recall that the sensor is a reed switch. It is activated by a floating magnetic ring that rides on the outside of a cylinder molded into the reservoir. The magnet/float is in contact with the coolant and rises and falls with coolant level. The sensor/switch fits up into the inside of the cylinder and is not in contact with coolant. The sensor/switch is normally open. When the magnet floats at a level above the switch, the circuit remains open. When the coolant level falls, the magnet does likewise and activates the reed switch, triggering the Low Coolant warning lamp.
Here's a document I found with a quick search that explains the reed switch operation:
Littlefuse Reed Switch Coolant Level Sensor
This video shows the floating magnetic ring in a cut-open GM reservoir:
Cheers,
Don
Last edited by Don B; 04-09-2019 at 08:55 AM.
The following users liked this post:
kr98664 (04-07-2019)
#12
Ahaa, got out my trusty dremel and removed the non-conductive cover to see what was inside. Not sure what the item is that shows up in the circuit? When I checked the two pins at the bottom with my multmeter, there was not a complete circuit. I checked and no coolant flows into the space occupied by the sensor. Looks like a metal tab is at the very bottom of the insert slot. Mystery to me? Thanks for your replys, very interesting.
Bob
end view With the black cover in place
Bob
end view With the black cover in place
#13
That certainly looks like a reed switch to me. Does the reservoir have the floating magnet on the outside of the tube? Even if you can't see it, you should be able to shake the reservoir and feel/hear it.
If feeling adventurous, you could solder a new reed switch into that holder. They are not expensive at all. You'd have to play with a magnet to orient the switch correctly. No continuity = low coolant message? If so, you'd have to orient the switch so when the magnet (coolant level) is up, you have continuity between the contacts. You'd save a lot of money over the cost of a new reservoir assembly.
If feeling adventurous, you could solder a new reed switch into that holder. They are not expensive at all. You'd have to play with a magnet to orient the switch correctly. No continuity = low coolant message? If so, you'd have to orient the switch so when the magnet (coolant level) is up, you have continuity between the contacts. You'd save a lot of money over the cost of a new reservoir assembly.
#14
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Crossroads of America
Posts: 19,581
Received 13,205 Likes
on
6,553 Posts
Bob, You may be able to test your reed switch by re-mounting it in the reservoir, orienting the reservoir so the magnet falls to its lowest level, then testing the sensor/switch to see if it is now closed (low resistance across its terminals indicating continuity). If your reed switch is working, the problem could be that the magnet is stuck in the reservoir or there is a short somewhere in the wiring for the sensor.
Cheers,
Don
Last edited by Don B; 04-09-2019 at 08:55 AM.
#15
I was just going by his previous comments of having the message and finding no continuity between the switch terminals. Of course, that's with the switch removed, so there's no actuating magnet currently in play.
How about this, to be sure? Turn the key to run, with the vehicle plug still disconnected. That's the same as the switch itself being open. Then jumper the two contacts on the vehicle plug. That's the same as the switch being closed. See which condition turns on the message.
If indeed the switch is bad, check this out:
https://www.rockauto.com/en/catalog/...el+sensor,2184
Does that look like the same part? It's for a 2004 Range Rover.
OEM #PCJ500020
Standard Motor Products #FLS169
The following 2 users liked this post by kr98664:
Don B (04-08-2019),
S-Type Owner (09-18-2019)
#17
You are right.. I cut mine open to look inside.
Hi Bob,
I'd have to dig a spare X350 reservoir out of the storage shed to confirm this, but I recall that the sensor is a reed switch. It is activated by a floating magnetic ring that rides on the outside of a cylinder molded into the reservoir. The magnet/float is in contact with the coolant and rises and falls with coolant level. The sensor/switch fits up into the inside of the cylinder and is not in contact with coolant. The sensor/switch is normally open. When the magnet floats at a level above the switch, the circuit remains open. When the coolant level falls, the magnet does likewise and activates the reed switch, triggering the Low Coolant warning lamp.
Here's a document I found with a quick search that explains the reed switch operation:
Littlefuse Reed Switch Coolant Level Sensor
This video shows the floating magnetic ring in a cut-open GM reservoir:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qXaqpg7D34
Cheers,
Don
I'd have to dig a spare X350 reservoir out of the storage shed to confirm this, but I recall that the sensor is a reed switch. It is activated by a floating magnetic ring that rides on the outside of a cylinder molded into the reservoir. The magnet/float is in contact with the coolant and rises and falls with coolant level. The sensor/switch fits up into the inside of the cylinder and is not in contact with coolant. The sensor/switch is normally open. When the magnet floats at a level above the switch, the circuit remains open. When the coolant level falls, the magnet does likewise and activates the reed switch, triggering the Low Coolant warning lamp.
Here's a document I found with a quick search that explains the reed switch operation:
Littlefuse Reed Switch Coolant Level Sensor
This video shows the floating magnetic ring in a cut-open GM reservoir:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qXaqpg7D34
Cheers,
Don
Last edited by Don B; 04-09-2019 at 08:57 AM.
#18
#20
Thankjs
Thanks for that, quite good prices on Rock Auto.
Now my brain hurts, trying to do the mental aerobics. Thanks...
I was just going by his previous comments of having the message and finding no continuity between the switch terminals. Of course, that's with the switch removed, so there's no actuating magnet currently in play.
How about this, to be sure? Turn the key to run, with the vehicle plug still disconnected. That's the same as the switch itself being open. Then jumper the two contacts on the vehicle plug. That's the same as the switch being closed. See which condition turns on the message.
If indeed the switch is bad, check this out:
https://www.rockauto.com/en/catalog/...el+sensor,2184
Does that look like the same part? It's for a 2004 Range Rover.
OEM #PCJ500020
Standard Motor Products #FLS169
I was just going by his previous comments of having the message and finding no continuity between the switch terminals. Of course, that's with the switch removed, so there's no actuating magnet currently in play.
How about this, to be sure? Turn the key to run, with the vehicle plug still disconnected. That's the same as the switch itself being open. Then jumper the two contacts on the vehicle plug. That's the same as the switch being closed. See which condition turns on the message.
If indeed the switch is bad, check this out:
https://www.rockauto.com/en/catalog/...el+sensor,2184
Does that look like the same part? It's for a 2004 Range Rover.
OEM #PCJ500020
Standard Motor Products #FLS169