S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Transmission Fluid Change

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-14-2010 | 01:29 PM
FloridaJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 350
Likes: 14
From: Houston Area
Default Transmission Fluid Change

I got my transmission serviced on my 03 Jaguar S-type at 64k miles this week. So far so good. I went to a local outfit and got the job done for about $240.00, which includes about 4 quarts of the Jaguar fluid. So far so good. I think I'll be okay. I plan on repeating this at 90k.

The mechanic said that the fluid was in pretty good condition although obviously new fluid will be better.

Being that I want to keep the car for at least 10 years from today, I think that this is a good course of action.

My opinion is that transmission fluids, like oils have improved over the years and can stand longer drain intervals than in the past. I obviously don't want to push it too much, but am confident about the plan forward.

So, the word to the wise is to get the fluid changed at 60k or so, although you will probably be good to 75k. Of course, this advise is free and should be taken with a grain of salt.
 
  #2  
Old 05-14-2010 | 01:40 PM
androulakis's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,964
Likes: 507
From: Hamilton, NJ
Default

Doesn't the trans hold over 10 quarts of fluid? That was the impression I have gotten.

George
 
  #3  
Old 05-14-2010 | 01:46 PM
JOsworth's Avatar
Veteran member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,390
Likes: 194
From: Akron, Ohio USA
Default

George, you took the words out of my mouth... I know you would have to flush it to get the stuff not sitting in the pan or torque converter...But I would think a simple pan drop would get at least 6 or 7 out...
 
  #4  
Old 05-14-2010 | 02:06 PM
Jon89's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,692
Likes: 4,434
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Flushing a transmission always carries a certain amount of inherent risk with it. When you dredge up old fluid and pull it through the valve bodies, you always run the risk of stirring up debris and causing it to clog areas that were clean before. I always stick with drain-and-fills on my vehicles. I believe it is much, much safer in the long run. Yeah, you do indeed leave more of the old fluid behind that way, but as long as you're getting more than 50% new fluid into your pan, most transmission experts will tell you that you're good to go....
 
  #5  
Old 05-14-2010 | 02:15 PM
joycesjag's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,007
Likes: 1,717
From: Sunny South Carolina
Default

I would have had them toss in a new electrical connector sleave!!!!!
 
  #6  
Old 05-14-2010 | 05:31 PM
DTB's Avatar
DTB
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 60
Likes: 1
From: West Hills, CA
Default

What process did they use to service the trans? Prob would be worth the extra money to have the filter/pan replaced at the same time plus you'd prob get more fluid out too. Did they use the actual Jag fluid or something compatible? Seems like the fluid alone (if it were from the dealer) would have been close to what you paid.
 
  #7  
Old 05-14-2010 | 08:19 PM
FloridaJag's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 350
Likes: 14
From: Houston Area
Default

The fluid alone is close to what I paid. I am not sure if this trans has a filter or just a screen. In any case, some new trans fluid is better than none at all. Since I will be doing this every 30k instead, I should be getting the junk out or at least keep it from getting much worse.

The car does take 10 quarts total, but I am sticking to drains and refills.
 
  #8  
Old 05-15-2010 | 08:16 AM
JOsworth's Avatar
Veteran member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,390
Likes: 194
From: Akron, Ohio USA
Default

Originally Posted by FloridaJag
The car does take 10 quarts total, but I am sticking to drains and refills.
I think everyone missed the point of my question. I wasn't questioning the choice of methods. I was questioning the amount of fluid drained. I would think dropping the pan would drain more than 4 quarts. That's closer to a third of the capacity instead of the typical 50% from a pan drop.
 
  #9  
Old 05-15-2010 | 01:32 PM
androulakis's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,964
Likes: 507
From: Hamilton, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by JOsworth
I think everyone missed the point of my question. I wasn't questioning the choice of methods. I was questioning the amount of fluid drained. I would think dropping the pan would drain more than 4 quarts. That's closer to a third of the capacity instead of the typical 50% from a pan drop.
Yeah I agree with that. I wonder how accurate the fill method was. I know you have to basically put fluid in the trans until it overflows at a certain temp (no dipstick), but was the fluid that came out captured and measured and replaced?

Btw notice any difference in performance?

George
 
  #10  
Old 05-15-2010 | 03:40 PM
MyBlackCat's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 552
Likes: 61
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by JOsworth
I think everyone missed the point of my question. I wasn't questioning the choice of methods. I was questioning the amount of fluid drained. I would think dropping the pan would drain more than 4 quarts. That's closer to a third of the capacity instead of the typical 50% from a pan drop.
Back in the "dark ages" when I worked as a tech a trans service (drop pan and change filter) the refill was 1 gallon or 4 quarts.These were TH350 and TH400 transmissions. They seemed larger dimensionally than our Jags.
A rebuilt would hold substantially more with torque converter included.
 
  #11  
Old 05-15-2010 | 08:29 PM
chucky60's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 127
Likes: 17
From: MA
Default 2000 4.0

When I had the pan dropped and the filter done on the 4.0 2000 it needed 5 quarts of mercon V
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bamforp
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
31
08-14-2024 06:36 PM
aholbro1
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
17
08-05-2021 06:02 AM
Wes Steenrod
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
6
09-06-2015 07:52 PM
pnwrs2000
XJ6 & XJ12 Series I, II & III
5
09-03-2015 12:55 PM
SouthernGypsy
XJS ( X27 )
5
09-03-2015 11:54 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.