S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 ) 1999 - 2008 2001 - 2009
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

unexpected slowness at the dragstrip ('03 STR)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #41  
Old 09-14-2010, 06:31 AM
bfsgross's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 5,084
Received 431 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

Popular guy huh? Well, you've been much sought after for good technical advice. Good job JagV8 and thank you very much for helping us out.
 
  #42  
Old 09-14-2010, 07:05 AM
JagV8's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 26,767
Received 4,531 Likes on 3,941 Posts
Default

Thanks. Though it may have been more a case of being "slow" to reply due to the different time zone (I was asleep).
 
  #43  
Old 11-09-2010, 08:40 PM
Phil_Deeznuutz's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: south Jersey
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default trackday #2...

I went to Atco Raceway tonight, posted a 13.651 with the new exhaust and filter. While this was initially encouraging (a .24 sec improvement over the last trip), the time was virtually identical to that of the last trip when considering density altitude.

So...I guess my question is, how accurate are DA calculators?
 
  #44  
Old 11-09-2010, 08:52 PM
Mafioso's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Carrollton TX
Posts: 1,080
Received 43 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Grab both slips and compare using the DA calculators
 
  #45  
Old 11-09-2010, 09:16 PM
Michael Star's Avatar
Veteran member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 2,327
Received 251 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

Just for a comparison, I ran a 14.2 @103 and a 2.6 60' time. It was hard for me to try to hook up.
 
  #46  
Old 11-09-2010, 09:23 PM
Phil_Deeznuutz's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: south Jersey
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mafioso
Grab both slips and compare using the DA calculators
I did this before my last post -- it was the result of this comparison that led me to note that today's time was virtually identical to the last when considering DA.

I have what I am assuming are the stock tires (Continental Sportcontact 2, with markings that indicate they were produced for the European market). What kinds of tires are y'all running at the track?
 
  #47  
Old 11-10-2010, 08:31 AM
clubairth1's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: home
Posts: 9,168
Received 2,366 Likes on 1,864 Posts
Default

HTML Code:
Jag claimed 400 HP for the 06-08 STR with VVT 10 HP power increase with my math.
We need to be careful here. There is some confusion about the engine ratings at this time. DIN .Vs. SAE, etc. Also remember when a number of cars had their published HP ratings changed? This was a voluntary rating change and some car companies changed and some did not. Basically the Jap cars were over rated and the V-8's from the US and Europe were underrated. So the VVT addition to the STR should gain some power but other than the rating change the later cars are no faster in the real world. I really suspect that Jaguar did not exploit the full value of the VVT system.

See the quote below about what happened.


SAE certified power

In 2005, the SAE introduced "SAE Certified Power" with SAE J2723[15]. This test is voluntary and is in itself not a separate engine test code but a certification of either J1349 or J1995 after which the manufacturer is allowed to advertise "Certified to SAE J1349" or "Certified to SAE J1995" depending on which test standard have been followed. To attain certification the test must follow the SAE standard in question, take place in a ISO9000/9002 certified facility and be witnessed by an SAE approved third party.
A few manufacturers such as Honda and Toyota switched to the new ratings immediately, with multi-directional results; the rated output of Cadillac's supercharged Northstar V8 jumped from 440 to 469 hp (330 to 350 kW) under the new tests, while the rating for Toyota's Camry 3.0 L 1MZ-FE V6 fell from 210 to 190 hp (160 to 140 kW). The ES330 and Camry SE V6 were previously rated at 225 hp but the ES330 dropped to 218 hp (163 kW) while the Camry declined to 210 hp (160 kW). The first engine certified under the new program was the 7.0 L LS7 used in the 2006 Chevrolet Corvette Z06. Certified power rose slightly from 500 to 505 hp (370 to 377 kW).
While Toyota and Honda are retesting their entire vehicle lineups, other automakers generally are retesting only those with updated powertrains. For example, the 2006 Ford Five Hundred is rated at 203 horsepower, the same as that of 2005 model. However, the 2006 rating does not reflect the new SAE testing procedure as Ford is not going to spend the extra expense of retesting its existing engines. Over time, most automakers are expected to comply with the new guidelines.
SAE tightened its horsepower rules after some engineers noticed parts of the old test could be subjected to different interpretations. Under the old testing procedures, there were small factors that required a judgment call: how much oil was in the crankcase, how the engine controls were calibrated and whether a vehicle was tested with premium fuel. In some cases, such can add up to a change in horsepower ratings. A road test editor at Edmunds.com, John Di Pietro, said decreases in horsepower ratings for some '06 models are not that dramatic. For vehicles like a midsize family sedan, it is likely that the reputation of the manufacturer will be more important.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Poet
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
6
06-07-2019 07:54 PM
Manjag
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
11
10-01-2015 05:34 PM
JaguarSV8
New Member Area - Intro a MUST
9
10-01-2015 01:58 AM
SoCalJagS
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
4
09-27-2015 09:20 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: unexpected slowness at the dragstrip ('03 STR)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 AM.