XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

Tensioners Again!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-15-2017, 01:53 PM
David Stevens's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: WV
Posts: 97
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Tensioners Again!

I've been reading a lot about replacing the secondary tensioners on our x308's. Lately I have stumbled on a post saying sometime in 2002 they fixed the problem and if your x308 had a VIN number greater than xxxxxx you should be good. I have a x308 vdp with 121000 on the clock. I've spent the winter doing preventive and fixing things. Coil packs, shock mounts, Interiour etc. I was ready to tackle the tensioners but I'm treading lightly. Anyway my VIN ends in 40511. Can anyone shed a light before I break it apart. Is mine a factory fix or do I need to look anyway.

Thanks all for helping me.
David
 
  #2  
Old 03-15-2017, 02:23 PM
Addicted2boost's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,671
Received 1,063 Likes on 819 Posts
Default

F41862 and higher have the updated tensioners. Assuming they haven't been updated in the past, you have the plastic tensioners.
 
The following users liked this post:
David Stevens (03-17-2017)
  #3  
Old 03-15-2017, 02:25 PM
David Stevens's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: WV
Posts: 97
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

My luck at least I was planning on that anyway.

Thank you much
 
  #4  
Old 03-16-2017, 05:55 PM
ericjansen's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Taiwan, R.O.C.
Posts: 3,247
Received 1,352 Likes on 927 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David Stevens
My luck at least I was planning on that anyway
With that settled, a word of advise: If you opt to do the secondaries yourself with the zip-tie method, be absolutely sure you rotate the relevant camshaft in such position that ALL lobs are without tension (no valve pressed).

Only in this position you can lift the camshaft, and torque it back without putting stress in it.
Doing otherwise might result into a broken camshaft!
 
The following users liked this post:
David Stevens (03-17-2017)
  #5  
Old 03-16-2017, 08:23 PM
JBzXJ40's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Auckland NZ/ Houston, TX
Posts: 859
Received 317 Likes on 243 Posts
Default

If you're just doing secondary tensioners, you need to make sure the flat spots on the cams are facing at 12 in relation to cylinder head position. You're going to need to hold the cams in place, loosen the bolt on the exhaust cam and remove. Take the sprocket out, and you can sneak the tensioner out without loosening any cam caps. Done it this way many many times. However its best to do the whole lot. Have seen primaries fail in the past.
 
The following users liked this post:
David Stevens (03-17-2017)
  #6  
Old 03-16-2017, 08:56 PM
Amphicar770's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 259
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Others may beg to differ but renting the tools makes the job very easy and eliminates the risks associated with the zip tie method.
 
The following users liked this post:
David Stevens (03-17-2017)
  #7  
Old 03-17-2017, 03:29 AM
Daim's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Bremen, Germany
Posts: 5,906
Received 2,181 Likes on 1,584 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Amphicar770
Others may beg to differ but renting the tools makes the job very easy and eliminates the risks associated with the zip tie method.
Especially as the lower tensioners are most likely cracked as well.
 
The following users liked this post:
David Stevens (03-17-2017)
  #8  
Old 03-17-2017, 11:06 AM
RJ237's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Douglasville Ga.
Posts: 8,681
Received 2,801 Likes on 2,236 Posts
Default

The primaries are not subjected to the high temp from the cylinder heads and are likely to last a lot longer.
 
The following users liked this post:
David Stevens (03-17-2017)
  #9  
Old 03-17-2017, 11:27 AM
Daim's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Bremen, Germany
Posts: 5,906
Received 2,181 Likes on 1,584 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RJ237
The primaries are not subjected to the high temp from the cylinder heads and are likely to last a lot longer.
Tell my former tensioners then, that they shouldn't crack They did. As well as the guides... The guides were actually falling apart.
 
The following users liked this post:
David Stevens (03-17-2017)
  #10  
Old 03-17-2017, 06:31 PM
ericjansen's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Taiwan, R.O.C.
Posts: 3,247
Received 1,352 Likes on 927 Posts
Default

I do agree that it is better to have them all exchanged, they might not fail as fast as the secondaries, but their plastics disintegrate in the same fashion.

However, the big difference is that the secondaries can fail catastrophically without warning, where the primaries should (..) start giving an indication by rattling without such catastrophe.

I myself only changed the top ones so far, with the primaries and new chains still in the box ..
Basically because I don't have the facilities to do them all myself, and as I still did not find the person I trust to do it for me.
 

Last edited by ericjansen; 03-17-2017 at 06:34 PM.
  #11  
Old 03-17-2017, 07:41 PM
nilanium's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 1,421
Received 492 Likes on 374 Posts
Default

Bought the car at 98k with a rattle caused by the primary guide failing. Secondaries were the original plastic style, with a slight cracking but no obvious failure yet. Not sure if either were replaced in the car's past. That middle piece on the right was fished out of the oil pan. Luckily it was the guide side and not the tensioner side that failed, if it had been the tensioned side then it's possible the chain could have skipped.
 
  #12  
Old 03-17-2017, 08:00 PM
RJ237's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Douglasville Ga.
Posts: 8,681
Received 2,801 Likes on 2,236 Posts
Default

It's possible the engine had overheated in the past. But I'm not disagreeing with you in that it's better to change everything. If I hear a rattle at startup I will certainly be ordering the parts, but until then I have other things to take up my limited budget.
 
  #13  
Old 03-18-2017, 09:29 AM
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Damon /Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,254
Received 2,191 Likes on 1,357 Posts
Default

updated style tensioners does NOT MEAN BULLETPROOF!!!
 
The following users liked this post:
motorcarman (03-19-2017)
  #14  
Old 03-19-2017, 09:27 AM
yeldogt's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NE
Posts: 1,887
Received 343 Likes on 297 Posts
Default

Brutal: Have you ever seen any documentation from Jaguar regarding the final metal tensioners?

I was told many years ago that no x308 got the final metal .. only the second generation. When I discussed the August 2001 changeover -- my friend (a long time Jaguar parts manager told me ... no) he even confirmed with the head mechanic that they had replaced many 2002's.
 
  #15  
Old 03-19-2017, 11:04 AM
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wise County,TX
Posts: 12,112
Received 8,092 Likes on 4,881 Posts
Default

From Engine (0108130000) onward.... ALL 4.0 engines had Silent Running Primaries and all metal bodied tensioners!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The newer style oil pump was used with the newer chain setup.

bob
 
The following users liked this post:
Brutal (03-20-2017)
  #16  
Old 03-19-2017, 02:08 PM
Sean B's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sunny Southport UK
Posts: 4,775
Received 1,357 Likes on 1,068 Posts
Default

Yep as Bob states from August 13th 2001 starting with chassis number F41862 all AJ27 were upgraded to AJ27S with the forthcoming stroked 4.2 timing gear and pump. There aren't many compared to prior units but they are about.
The 2002MY in the UK are MY2001 and it'd have to be a late USA MY02 to have that version of the engine. The USA MY03 cars will have them, but they'll be rare as the production in the UK finished summer 2002 with the forthcoming X350 and changeover of factory from Brown's to Whitley.
 

Last edited by Sean B; 03-19-2017 at 02:11 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Jhartz (03-19-2017)
  #17  
Old 03-19-2017, 09:16 PM
yeldogt's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NE
Posts: 1,887
Received 343 Likes on 297 Posts
Default

The 02 XJR I bought new has a late August 01 production date -- F45829. My other one is much later .....

41863 was the start of 02 production in 8/01

Got the engine number from the dealer years ago -- In my files ..... someplace.
 

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 AM.