throttle position sensor x type 2004
#1
throttle position sensor x type 2004
Hey folk
i got the same issue for every one P0121 code and the famous lamb mode, since the throttle assembly is over $800 i am not dump to change the whole part while what i need is only the TPS.
i have done my homework and i found that.
the lexus GS400 TPS is same as the X type.
it has four pin which is 1- power 2-ground 3-idle 4-signal
can any one find what is the volt reading for the x type and lexus also the ohm reading.
here is the photo i found online.
http://www.tomsforeign.com/images/pr.../161659_2_.jpg
http://www.tomsforeign.com/images/pr.../173444_4_.jpg
lexus gs400
http://cdn0.autopartsnetwork.com/ima...1739174OES.JPG
i got the same issue for every one P0121 code and the famous lamb mode, since the throttle assembly is over $800 i am not dump to change the whole part while what i need is only the TPS.
i have done my homework and i found that.
the lexus GS400 TPS is same as the X type.
it has four pin which is 1- power 2-ground 3-idle 4-signal
can any one find what is the volt reading for the x type and lexus also the ohm reading.
here is the photo i found online.
http://www.tomsforeign.com/images/pr.../161659_2_.jpg
http://www.tomsforeign.com/images/pr.../173444_4_.jpg
lexus gs400
http://cdn0.autopartsnetwork.com/ima...1739174OES.JPG
The following users liked this post:
Stuart Beattie (04-23-2014)
#2
Welcome to the forum HCW,
(I've moved your tech question to the X-Type section as it is model specific.)
Please follow this link to the New Member Area - Intro a MUST section New Member Area - Intro a MUST - Jaguar Forums - Jaguar Enthusiasts Forum to post an introduction about yourself and your vehicle to all members.
Graham
(I've moved your tech question to the X-Type section as it is model specific.)
Please follow this link to the New Member Area - Intro a MUST section New Member Area - Intro a MUST - Jaguar Forums - Jaguar Enthusiasts Forum to post an introduction about yourself and your vehicle to all members.
Graham
#4
You might want to look at this thread
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...acement-77560/
I don't know about the Lexus, I read somewhere it looks the same externally but isn't.
If you can get your hands on one the details in the above thread will let you check it.
https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...acement-77560/
I don't know about the Lexus, I read somewhere it looks the same externally but isn't.
If you can get your hands on one the details in the above thread will let you check it.
The following users liked this post:
Stuart Beattie (04-23-2014)
#5
One other thought. I was having what appeared to be similar issues with mine. I cleaned the throttle body and the issues disappeared. My throttle body has been changed twice now, and it's expensive.
The cleaning did help keep it from sticking and that seemed to be the crux of the problem (in my case)
The cleaning did help keep it from sticking and that seemed to be the crux of the problem (in my case)
#6
#7
just found an after market new throttle body for cheap $211 + shipping
the brand is OES i wounder if any one have try it?
here is the link
04 2004 Jaguar X Type Throttle Body - Fuel Injection - Genuine - PartsGeek
the brand is OES i wounder if any one have try it?
here is the link
04 2004 Jaguar X Type Throttle Body - Fuel Injection - Genuine - PartsGeek
Trending Topics
#9
#11
#12
jaguar x type '04 awd 3.0 throttle body
Brand New Genuine Throttle Body for Jaguar s Type x Type | eBay
That is $500... Did anybody use this?
That is $500... Did anybody use this?
#14
#15
THROTTLE POSITION SENSOR 1 SIGNAL: IDLE = 0.74 V; FULL THROTTLE = 3.97 V
THROTTLE POSITION SENSOR 2 SIGNAL: IDLE = 1.65 V; FULL THROTTLE = 4.20 V
but ohm reading for Lexus:
Click Link To See Picture
Last edited by Cambo; 04-16-2014 at 03:13 AM. Reason: Picture was huge!
#16
#17
Just an FYI, I could not take it anymore. So, today I took the TPS off of the throttle body and removed the metal cover. The TPS is well made internally, and mine did not show significant signs of wear, even under a microscope. It looked good.
Yes, at 40 power, I could just barely see rub marks on the surface of the resistive trace. But, they were absolutely tiny and immeasurable, and I'd consider them insignificant.
I had to break the metal cover off, peel it back and inspect. I re-assembled with JB-Weld Quik and a hot glue gun. It might hold, it might not. At this point, I don't care. Didn't work properly anyway.
I'll find out tomorrow on the way to work...
UPDATE: The internal cleaning certainly helped. It did not malfunction at all. Reliability remains to be seen. But so far, I'm thankful for one day of pleasant driving...
Yes, at 40 power, I could just barely see rub marks on the surface of the resistive trace. But, they were absolutely tiny and immeasurable, and I'd consider them insignificant.
I had to break the metal cover off, peel it back and inspect. I re-assembled with JB-Weld Quik and a hot glue gun. It might hold, it might not. At this point, I don't care. Didn't work properly anyway.
I'll find out tomorrow on the way to work...
UPDATE: The internal cleaning certainly helped. It did not malfunction at all. Reliability remains to be seen. But so far, I'm thankful for one day of pleasant driving...
Last edited by cujet; 07-15-2013 at 07:20 PM.
#19
If that question is directed at me...
Yes, I've casually checked the wiring at the plug for both the TPS and the stepper motor. I cleaned them (they were clean before) with contact cleaner, and used some contact enhancer called "Stabilant 22". It's works very well on problem contacts.
However, I have not disassembled the connectors and removed the wires to check for a good crimp junction. The problem does not seem to be the connector, but the TPS itself.
BY THE WAY, it's still working perfectly!!
Yes, I've casually checked the wiring at the plug for both the TPS and the stepper motor. I cleaned them (they were clean before) with contact cleaner, and used some contact enhancer called "Stabilant 22". It's works very well on problem contacts.
However, I have not disassembled the connectors and removed the wires to check for a good crimp junction. The problem does not seem to be the connector, but the TPS itself.
BY THE WAY, it's still working perfectly!!
#20
This pic is from the other TPS thread on this forum.
This is exactly how mine looked inside when "peeled apart". Remember, those traces lay on top of the wipers. However, mine had no visible wear on the resistive traces. And the wipers were in better shape.
As I mentioned, I put a bit more pre-load on the wipers to ensure a good contact. In essence, I bent them up about 2mm with a pair of tweezers.
Still working great.
Last edited by cujet; 07-17-2013 at 09:25 PM.