2012 XFR or Loaded Portfolio
#1
2012 XFR or Loaded Portfolio
I'm about to pull the trigger on a new XF, but I can't decide between a loaded Portfolio and an XFR. Now that you can get the R seats and most of the exterior trim on the Portfolio (new Sport Package), I'm torn between the two.
If I didn't already have a 510 hp XKR, it would be a no-brainer and I'd just get the XFR. The Portfolio is about $70,000 MSRP (pretty much all options except adaptive cruise) and the XFR is about $85,000 (Black Package and carbon fiber veneer). Don't want the S/C model because I'd add B&W stereo, aero add-ons, and other options that would bring it very close to the R price anyway.
If I'm used to 510 hp, will the 385 hp seem too slow? It seemed OK in the test drive of a 2011. A $15,000 difference is not insubstantial, but it's hard to put a price on potentially having buyer's remorse ("I shoulda bought the R"). Would resale value be better on an XFR compared to a Portfolio with $10K in options?
If I didn't already have a 510 hp XKR, it would be a no-brainer and I'd just get the XFR. The Portfolio is about $70,000 MSRP (pretty much all options except adaptive cruise) and the XFR is about $85,000 (Black Package and carbon fiber veneer). Don't want the S/C model because I'd add B&W stereo, aero add-ons, and other options that would bring it very close to the R price anyway.
If I'm used to 510 hp, will the 385 hp seem too slow? It seemed OK in the test drive of a 2011. A $15,000 difference is not insubstantial, but it's hard to put a price on potentially having buyer's remorse ("I shoulda bought the R"). Would resale value be better on an XFR compared to a Portfolio with $10K in options?
#2
#4
Nope...has to be new (business tax purposes). Plus, I prefer the refreshed design. The more I think about it, I really don't think the hp difference is going to matter that much in Chicagoland traffic. Plus, on the days that I have the urge to surge, there's an XKR175 waiting to be taken out and played with.
I could shave a few grand off of the Portfolio by sticking with the standard stereo. Is the standard sound system lousy or just not quite as good as the B&W?
I could shave a few grand off of the Portfolio by sticking with the standard stereo. Is the standard sound system lousy or just not quite as good as the B&W?
#6
#7
Although I am sure the B&W would be even better--the "standard" stereo in the XF is fantastic! And this is from someone who is crazy enough to have spent more than 50k on my home audio system.
Nope...has to be new (business tax purposes). Plus, I prefer the refreshed design. The more I think about it, I really don't think the hp difference is going to matter that much in Chicagoland traffic. Plus, on the days that I have the urge to surge, there's an XKR175 waiting to be taken out and played with.
I could shave a few grand off of the Portfolio by sticking with the standard stereo. Is the standard sound system lousy or just not quite as good as the B&W?
I could shave a few grand off of the Portfolio by sticking with the standard stereo. Is the standard sound system lousy or just not quite as good as the B&W?
Trending Topics
#8
#9
#10
Now I just have to decide on the color.
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
carbon fiber
I'm about to pull the trigger on a new XF, but I can't decide between a loaded Portfolio and an XFR. Now that you can get the R seats and most of the exterior trim on the Portfolio (new Sport Package), I'm torn between the two.
If I didn't already have a 510 hp XKR, it would be a no-brainer and I'd just get the XFR. The Portfolio is about $70,000 MSRP (pretty much all options except adaptive cruise) and the XFR is about $85,000 (Black Package and carbon fiber veneer). Don't want the S/C model because I'd add B&W stereo, aero add-ons, and other options that would bring it very close to the R price anyway.
If I'm used to 510 hp, will the 385 hp seem too slow? It seemed OK in the test drive of a 2011. A $15,000 difference is not insubstantial, but it's hard to put a price on potentially having buyer's remorse ("I shoulda bought the R"). Would resale value be better on an XFR compared to a Portfolio with $10K in options?
If I didn't already have a 510 hp XKR, it would be a no-brainer and I'd just get the XFR. The Portfolio is about $70,000 MSRP (pretty much all options except adaptive cruise) and the XFR is about $85,000 (Black Package and carbon fiber veneer). Don't want the S/C model because I'd add B&W stereo, aero add-ons, and other options that would bring it very close to the R price anyway.
If I'm used to 510 hp, will the 385 hp seem too slow? It seemed OK in the test drive of a 2011. A $15,000 difference is not insubstantial, but it's hard to put a price on potentially having buyer's remorse ("I shoulda bought the R"). Would resale value be better on an XFR compared to a Portfolio with $10K in options?
Carbon fiber is a super strong material that's also extremely lightweight.
Carbon fiber is basically very thin strands of carbon -- even thinner than human hair. The strands can be twisted together, like yarn.
Although carbon fiber is very expensive, it’s very popular. It has a fantastic weight-to-strength ratio.
Its strength and weight make it ideal for electric cars, sports cars and luxury cars.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)