XF and XFR ( X250 ) 2007 - 2015

Low milage 09 or high milage 10?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-09-2013, 10:06 AM
pumba's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Low milage 09 or high milage 10?

Hello

Buying my first Jag
So far I narrowed my search to two potential cars:

1) '09 4.2L, 42000km milage
nice condition, some scratches, nothing major

2) '10 5.0L 98000km milage
Immaculate condition, like new. Hard to believe that this car has almost 100K on it

Same price. I also getting extended warranty so for next 2-3 years I'll be covered. Both Premium Luxiry.

I really like the fact that '09 has low mileage but also love the way 5.0L engine drives, but my concern is higher milage on '10 car.

Should I be even concerned about 98000km milage or is it perfectly fine?

I myself usually put around 15000km / year
 
  #2  
Old 08-09-2013, 10:31 AM
TheLegend's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Bolingbrook, IL
Posts: 133
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Those miles are to high. I say continue your search.
 
  #3  
Old 08-09-2013, 11:01 AM
pumba's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those mileages are in kilometers. Here is conversion to miles:

1) '09 : 42000km = 26000 miles
2) '10 : 98000km = 60000 miles
 
  #4  
Old 08-09-2013, 11:15 AM
Swimref's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 583
Received 109 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

I would absolutely take the newer model with the better engine. From your description it sounds like it has mostly highway miles, which are much easier on it than the short trip mileage you probably have on the '09. You stated it looks almost new indicating it has been cared for and probably not used as much in stop-and-go type driving. Presumably the option level is similar, but if one had the B & W audio and the other did not that would be worth considering. I am surprised you can get a newer and much better ('09 early bugs largely gone by '10, and the DI engine is far superior) model without having to pay more. If you ever intend to sell the car in the future you would get more for the newer better one as well.
 
  #5  
Old 08-09-2013, 11:55 AM
caviarjag's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Westchester
Posts: 335
Received 55 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

I would disagree. Resale on high mileage jaguars is terrible. From a close personal friend at a senior level at a dealer, they can't give these cars away with high miles, particularly XKs. If you plan on keeping the car long term, I would take the 2010. Otherwise, if you plan on keeping it less than 4 years or so, go for the lower miles. Of course, this is all moot if you plan on putting a ton of miles on it.
 
  #6  
Old 08-09-2013, 12:17 PM
swaite3's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I just was in a similar situation, I was between a 2009 supercharged and a 2010 5.0 na. I went with the 09 SC because it had more options plus it had the spice interior I really like with only 33k miles on it and looked like new w/cpo warr
 

Last edited by swaite3; 08-09-2013 at 02:02 PM.
  #7  
Old 08-09-2013, 01:44 PM
chXFS's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 424
Received 99 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

2009 sc ftw
 
  #8  
Old 08-09-2013, 01:45 PM
axr6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 2,367
Received 594 Likes on 422 Posts
Default

Both engines are very good. You choice depends on how much would you use the extra power from the larger, 5.0 V8? The 4.2L is plenty enough for most drivers. (I know, I have had both)

As an other poster suggested resale values are rock bottom for higher mileage Jaguars so, if selling the car is in your future plans, that should be taken into account.

For my present personal use I would likely take the lower mileage 4.2L.

Albert
 
  #9  
Old 08-09-2013, 01:51 PM
BritCars's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Boston, MA USA
Posts: 2,420
Received 441 Likes on 389 Posts
Default

What's the price premium of a 'typical' mileage 2010 Premium Luxury vs. the one you are looking at here? Of course caviarjag is right that high miles drive down the price significantly, but that's of course why you are able to find a one-year newer model with the better engine for the same price! So resale value is worse - but your purchase price is also a lot lower than for a low-mileage one.

If it were me I would still strive for the 2010 with the 5.0L engine as I do think it's much better. But I would hold off on a 60k mile vehicle and keep shopping around for something with more moderate miles - maybe not low mileage but at least average.
 
  #10  
Old 08-09-2013, 04:18 PM
XJL's Avatar
XJL
XJL is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Southern California, USA
Posts: 832
Received 142 Likes on 109 Posts
Default

I would not buy the 2009 because it's the first year for the XF and there were several issues that you could avoid dealing with. The 2012 has way to many miles and no matter what the condition is, I am sure you can find one with lower miles AND in great condition.

Just be patient and keep looking..........Don't rush into a major purchase like this without finding the right car.
 
  #11  
Old 08-10-2013, 08:51 AM
pumba's Avatar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you everybody. Looks like there pros and cons in every choice

2010 model with low milage would cost me about $7000-9000 more, which I can not afford.

So I drove them both again and the way '10 drives matches my driving style perfectly.
I am also getting set of brand new tires + navigation update + $2000 discount on 2010 so I decided to go with '10. BTW, it has B&W sound also

Signed papers yesterday. Yohoo !!!!
Happy to join Jaguar family!
 
  #12  
Old 08-10-2013, 11:11 AM
jagular's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 2,606
Received 283 Likes on 261 Posts
Default

Jaguar engines and transmissions easily run to high mileages. If they depreciate rapidly due to high mileages that's an excellent reason to buy one used, great value. 100,000 km is a psychological number and means absolutely nothing. Buy the newer car and pocket the savings. The depreciation has already been experienced by earlier owners.
 
The following users liked this post:
Swimref (08-10-2013)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wolfy
XJ ( X351 )
58
05-28-2024 08:06 AM
rsa760041
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
23
09-25-2015 01:33 PM
ccfulton
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
4
09-20-2015 05:15 PM
avern1
X-Type ( X400 )
12
09-08-2015 06:25 PM
hen555
XF and XFR ( X250 )
2
09-07-2015 11:13 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Low milage 09 or high milage 10?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:02 PM.