TATA beancounters are destroying Jaguar already
#1
TATA beancounters are destroying Jaguar already
It appears 2012 changes show how little these people understand about the car business, or basic marketing principles in general.
The important rule is always: don't ever take away what you already gave!!!!
1) Warranty coverage is reduced from 5 to 4 years
2) Discontinue free maintenance program
Just these 2 downgrades clearly demonstrate the company infers, or downright admits the product is unreliable, and costs dearly to maintain. If this is true or not, is irrelevant.
Stupid is what stupid does. Any garden variety BMW salesman with half a brain will eat Jaguar for lunch.
In addition, this cost reduction drive is dumbing down the car in other ways - just one example is fold-down rear seat becomes an option.
I'm sure we will find other stupid changes.
The important rule is always: don't ever take away what you already gave!!!!
1) Warranty coverage is reduced from 5 to 4 years
2) Discontinue free maintenance program
Just these 2 downgrades clearly demonstrate the company infers, or downright admits the product is unreliable, and costs dearly to maintain. If this is true or not, is irrelevant.
Stupid is what stupid does. Any garden variety BMW salesman with half a brain will eat Jaguar for lunch.
In addition, this cost reduction drive is dumbing down the car in other ways - just one example is fold-down rear seat becomes an option.
I'm sure we will find other stupid changes.
#2
That's really too bad. One of the selling points getting me over the worries about the reliability/expense issue (vs. BMW) was the maintenance and warranty. My std. response to friends chiding me about leaving BMW for Jag is my car's 5/50 warranty and maintenance. BMW is the natural competitor to Jag, so taking away sales from BMW should be a priority. My last 3 cars had been BMWs. This Jag could be a blip....
#3
Very few car manufacturers include a free maintance program. BMW has it becuase their cars a expensive to maintain. Lexus doesn't and it has no problems selling cars.
The reduction to a 4 year waranty makes sense too not too many people offer a 5 year warranty and some new cars just come with a 3 year warranty. They're probably doing it as they want to move people to leasing cars as opposed to buying a new one outright.
The reduction to a 4 year waranty makes sense too not too many people offer a 5 year warranty and some new cars just come with a 3 year warranty. They're probably doing it as they want to move people to leasing cars as opposed to buying a new one outright.
#4
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 117,564
Received 6,330 Likes
on
5,516 Posts
I agree that reducing the warranty period may not be seen as a good thing, but they are matching the 4 year/50K that BMW offers.
It looks like you are mistaken regarding the maintenance being withdrawn.
"Jaguar Platinum Coverage includes all factory recommended scheduled maintenance for four years or 50,000 miles, whichever occurs first."
Jaguar USA - JAGUAR PLATINUM COVERAGE#
It looks like you are mistaken regarding the maintenance being withdrawn.
"Jaguar Platinum Coverage includes all factory recommended scheduled maintenance for four years or 50,000 miles, whichever occurs first."
Jaguar USA - JAGUAR PLATINUM COVERAGE#
#6
4/50 is the industry standard. To be honest, the extra years is irrelevant for most people. Mileage is much better, and nobody gives bumper to bumper coverage more than 50,000 miles. I think they should have kept free maintenance, but it's expensive and they have to then add it to the price of the car. Don't be fooled...BMW is making you pay for it's free maintenance. BMW's are way overpriced relative to the competition. Jaguar is still covering SCHEDULED maintenance but no more brakes, etc. It's a middle approach, but if it helps maintain lower MSRPs, then it's fine.
Only BMW does everything so let's stop using the Tata thing. In fact, anyone at Jaguar will tell you that Jaguar is much more independent and truly British under Tata than Ford.
Only BMW does everything so let's stop using the Tata thing. In fact, anyone at Jaguar will tell you that Jaguar is much more independent and truly British under Tata than Ford.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Jag's making headway but I'm sure they dream of catching up with their competitors much quicker in the sales department.
#9
??
Jaguar Posts Strong UK Sales Figures AS XJ Establishes Firm Segment Lead
http://profit.ndtv.com/news/show/jag...n-pound-156738
Jaguar sells elsewhere than in the US you know.
Jaguar Posts Strong UK Sales Figures AS XJ Establishes Firm Segment Lead
http://profit.ndtv.com/news/show/jag...n-pound-156738
Jaguar sells elsewhere than in the US you know.
Last edited by jagular; 09-09-2011 at 06:24 PM.
#10
??
Jaguar Posts Strong UK Sales Figures AS XJ Establishes Firm Segment Lead
Jaguar Land Rover's FY '11 profit zooms to 1 bn pound - NDTV Profit
Jaguar sells elsewhere than in the US you know.
Jaguar Posts Strong UK Sales Figures AS XJ Establishes Firm Segment Lead
Jaguar Land Rover's FY '11 profit zooms to 1 bn pound - NDTV Profit
Jaguar sells elsewhere than in the US you know.
Let's just focus on global sales to be fair. Your article says Jag was up 3% worldwide Q1 . Did you know that BMW was up 21% for the same period? How about that Mercedes was up almost 13% worldwide? Audi? Yeah, they were up double digits as well (18.4%)
Men lie, women lie. Numbers don't.
Last edited by duke_dallas; 09-09-2011 at 09:04 PM.
#11
Jaguar does not pretend to be a volume manufacturer such as Mercedes, BMW, or Audi. They only have 3 models! I think a fair comparison would be comparing Jaguar sales to the equivalent 3 models from these other car makers. That would be more appropriate.
Nothing is more irritating than numbers being used to make a point based on a flawed analysis.
Nothing is more irritating than numbers being used to make a point based on a flawed analysis.
The following users liked this post:
newbiegurl (09-02-2012)
#12
I think the saying is there's lies, danged lies and statistics.
Rates of change of sales are essentially meaningless numbers.
The only numbers that actually matter to businessmen appear on the bottom line.
Ford never made any money from Jaguar. GM made money only for FIAT and has now been broke, officially. Chrysler has been broke at least three times now.
Jaguar is turning a profit now. Jaguar has released two new models since Ford sold them and has three more almost ready to release. The XK makes money, the XF makes lots of money and the new XJ is making money.
Have you seen the Top Gear web site? They show actual pictures of the new sportscars Jaguar is building for next year and the year after. An awd sedan is also due to come out.
Tata is doing the right thing by Jaguar.
Rates of change of sales are essentially meaningless numbers.
The only numbers that actually matter to businessmen appear on the bottom line.
Ford never made any money from Jaguar. GM made money only for FIAT and has now been broke, officially. Chrysler has been broke at least three times now.
Jaguar is turning a profit now. Jaguar has released two new models since Ford sold them and has three more almost ready to release. The XK makes money, the XF makes lots of money and the new XJ is making money.
Have you seen the Top Gear web site? They show actual pictures of the new sportscars Jaguar is building for next year and the year after. An awd sedan is also due to come out.
Tata is doing the right thing by Jaguar.
The following users liked this post:
4newjagownr (05-22-2012)
#13
Jaguar does not pretend to be a volume manufacturer such as Mercedes, BMW, or Audi. They only have 3 models! I think a fair comparison would be comparing Jaguar sales to the equivalent 3 models from these other car makers. That would be more appropriate.
Nothing is more irritating than numbers being used to make a point based on a flawed analysis.
Nothing is more irritating than numbers being used to make a point based on a flawed analysis.
YOY sales numbers are a good tool because statistically it compares the company to itself and allows you to see how it's trending in comparison to the rest of the industry. Jaguar had 3 models in the Q1 2010 (actually maybe it was 2 depending on when the new XJ touched down) and they had 3 models in Q1 2011. Merc, BMW and Audi had a similar number of models in their respective portfolios from year to year as well yet their sales increased by double digit percentages while Jags didn't. The significance of this number in an analysis of how well Jag is doing seems plain to me. Why is Jag mostly missing out on the luxury car sales growth party?
And to Jagular's comment, is this success beyond their wildest dreams?
Last edited by duke_dallas; 09-10-2011 at 01:05 AM.
#14
#15
Jaguar is also profitable. The SUV business is still inexplicably highly profitable for all makers. Inexplicably because so many people are paying premium prices for inferior vehicles that don't meet all the safety and environmental standards that apply to cars. If the SUV had to be built like a car nobody would buy one unless they needed off road capability.
Fact is Tata is doing much better with Jaguar than Ford ever did (or Leyland for that matter). This thread is about the idea that Tata is ruining Jaguar by offering inferior warranties. On the contrary, Tata can offer inferior warranties because customers are buying the cars anyway... the Tata Jaguars are better built also.
Fact is Tata is doing much better with Jaguar than Ford ever did (or Leyland for that matter). This thread is about the idea that Tata is ruining Jaguar by offering inferior warranties. On the contrary, Tata can offer inferior warranties because customers are buying the cars anyway... the Tata Jaguars are better built also.
#16
Reading the replies here, I'm scratchin my head. I was refering to the negative implications from marketing stand point. Some people think backwards here, I think.
If the Tata Jaguar is a much better car, then why not increase the warranty coverage rather than reduce it. Increasing will not cost the company more money 'if the cars are generally better...' That's what I would do with my products. Long warranties are an important marketing tool
It's all about comparison points to help your dealers sell more cars against the competition. Tata is making it harder.
In the USA, in this business, perception is everything.
When you are coming from behind, like Jaguar is , you must give more than the established brands.
And yes, I do think the XF is a better product than the BMW , MB, Audi direct competitors. That does not help Jaguar unfortunately to increase market share.
Word of mouth does not save brands in this business.
If the Tata Jaguar is a much better car, then why not increase the warranty coverage rather than reduce it. Increasing will not cost the company more money 'if the cars are generally better...' That's what I would do with my products. Long warranties are an important marketing tool
It's all about comparison points to help your dealers sell more cars against the competition. Tata is making it harder.
In the USA, in this business, perception is everything.
When you are coming from behind, like Jaguar is , you must give more than the established brands.
And yes, I do think the XF is a better product than the BMW , MB, Audi direct competitors. That does not help Jaguar unfortunately to increase market share.
Word of mouth does not save brands in this business.
#17
#18
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 117,564
Received 6,330 Likes
on
5,516 Posts
Did we find some evidence that the warrranty is inferior?
#19
A longer warranty inplies that you think the car will have reliability issues. Besides, why offer a longer warranty if none of your competitors are?
Increasing a warranty is also expensive as they ahve to account for warranty on their accounting books. So they need to "prefund" the warranty expense account and it'll show up as a liability.
Increasing a warranty is also expensive as they ahve to account for warranty on their accounting books. So they need to "prefund" the warranty expense account and it'll show up as a liability.
#20
Whether the cost savings outweighs the profit realized from having best in class warranty as a marketing tool is debatable.