XJ ( X351 ) 2009 - 2019

5.0 SC Power Upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 02-28-2022 | 05:19 PM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 422
From: San Diego
Default

Stock 5.0 sc can go past 600hp with Alpha Jag Tune

https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...g-time-256504/
 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 112.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 SC (Alpha Jag ECU, TCU tune, crank pulley), 600+ HP, 11.6 sec 1/4th mi 122mph, 7.6sec 1/8th mi
  #22  
Old 02-28-2022 | 05:22 PM
ampiko's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AlexJag
Stock 5.0 sc can go past 600hp with Alpha Jag Tune

https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...g-time-256504/
What about the torque, is that limited under 700Nm/515lb-ft ? Thanks
 
  #23  
Old 02-28-2022 | 06:25 PM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 422
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by ampiko
What about the torque, is that limited under 700Nm/515lb-ft ? Thanks
it's not, torque numbers would be similar
 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 112.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 SC (Alpha Jag ECU, TCU tune, crank pulley), 600+ HP, 11.6 sec 1/4th mi 122mph, 7.6sec 1/8th mi
  #24  
Old 02-28-2022 | 06:32 PM
ampiko's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AlexJag
it's not, torque numbers would be similar
remarkable! so tempting, enticing! but then need to respect the torque limit on the transmission,,, hmmm
 
  #25  
Old 02-28-2022 | 09:05 PM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 422
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by ampiko
remarkable! so tempting, enticing! but then need to respect the torque limit on the transmission,,, hmmm
we have multiple XF, xfr jaguars with over 700 hp ,including one with nitrous pushed very hard at tracks and doing 10s in 1/4 mi and here are no transmission issues . So 600 is not a problem at all for this transmission.
 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 112.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 SC (Alpha Jag ECU, TCU tune, crank pulley), 600+ HP, 11.6 sec 1/4th mi 122mph, 7.6sec 1/8th mi

Last edited by AlexJag; 02-28-2022 at 10:11 PM.
  #26  
Old 03-01-2022 | 10:01 AM
XJsss's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,817
Likes: 516
From: Reynolds Lake Oconee, GA USA
Default

In all the tunes I have seen they limit the torque to the 516 foot pounds. One of the most popular is VAP a sponsor here. There are a lot of references to them on F Type forum.
 
  #27  
Old 03-01-2022 | 10:51 AM
dmchao's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 600
Likes: 94
Default

Say what you will - if your transmission is a newer trans, then that power may be attainable.
The 6HP28 is listed on ZF's data sheet as being capable of 550 ft lbs. There are always engineering factors of safety, but there are tradeoffs when heat and friction exceed expectations, so it's not something that someone can say is "no problem".

The newer 8 speeds can handle more.
 
  #28  
Old 03-01-2022 | 12:40 PM
ampiko's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dmchao
Say what you will - if your transmission is a newer trans, then that power may be attainable.
The 6HP28 is listed on ZF's data sheet as being capable of 550 ft lbs. There are always engineering factors of safety, but there are tradeoffs when heat and friction exceed expectations, so it's not something that someone can say is "no problem".

The newer 8 speeds can handle more.
I have read that both 8-sp and 6-sp units are rated at 700Nm/515lb-ft. No difference in load limit. Can you share the info source of 550 rating. I hope that it is true
 
  #29  
Old 03-01-2022 | 12:58 PM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 422
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by XJsss
In all the tunes I have seen they limit the torque to the 516 foot pounds. One of the most popular is VAP a sponsor here. There are a lot of references to them on F Type forum.
I could care less what VAP does. I was asked the question regarding the limit on the transmission on my tuning. My answer is the six speed can handle quite more than 516lb and do it safely..
 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 112.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 SC (Alpha Jag ECU, TCU tune, crank pulley), 600+ HP, 11.6 sec 1/4th mi 122mph, 7.6sec 1/8th mi
  #30  
Old 03-01-2022 | 04:07 PM
ampiko's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AlexJag
I could care less what VAP does. I was asked the question regarding the limit on the transmission on my tuning. My answer is the six speed can handle quite more than 516lb and do it safely..
I have heard that the trans can handle way more even upto 25% higher. Alex, does your tune remove the soft-limit in the gearbox that prevents the torque to go beyond 700Nm?
 
  #31  
Old 03-01-2022 | 04:43 PM
dmchao's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 600
Likes: 94
Default

Originally Posted by ampiko
I have read that both 8-sp and 6-sp units are rated at 700Nm/515lb-ft. No difference in load limit. Can you share the info source of 550 rating. I hope that it is true
Sorry, I believe you are right. To be honest, I thought the 8 sp had higher input torque max.

https://www.wardsauto.com/news-analy...p-transmission
I truthfully could not find a more definitive confirmation, but this is an old article. I confirmed in person as my best friend works for ZF and designs torque converters. He had a spec sheet issued by ZF I was reviewing and ballpark max is 550 ft lb. Anything more is just engineering data they typically don't release to anyone but the OEM. Again, yes you can go higher than max. The rest is risk/reward and dealing with the unknowns. I argue that 516/550 for a transmission will not make a material impact. This is not a tire where they rate 4/5 times lower than max burst. They do go above and beyond listed for all transmissions.

8HP70 is listed as 516 ft lb on paper.

I don't believe most limit to 516 because that's all that can be done, but I am betting most do that due to the chain of liability that can cause emotional or financial heartburn down the road since that's what ZF lists. I won't put words in others mouths though.
 

Last edited by dmchao; 03-01-2022 at 04:50 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Panthro (07-27-2024)
  #32  
Old 03-01-2022 | 04:57 PM
ampiko's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dmchao
Sorry, I believe you are right. To be honest, I thought the 8 sp had higher input torque max.
https://www.wardsauto.com/news-analy...p-transmission
I truthfully could not find a more definitive confirmation, but this is an old article. I confirmed in person as my best friend works for ZF and designs torque converters. He had a spec sheet issued by ZF I was reviewing and ballpark max is 550 ft lb. .
Thanks for sharing. Must be one of the first published data and then retracted to 515lb-ft later on, for liability/legal reasons....
 
  #33  
Old 03-02-2022 | 01:12 AM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 422
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by ampiko
Thanks for sharing. Must be one of the first published data and then retracted to 515lb-ft later on, for liability/legal reasons....
Just for reference on the earlier zf on 4.2xkr The torque is over 500 with our tune And it's handling it just fine and taking quite a bit of abuse
 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 112.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 SC (Alpha Jag ECU, TCU tune, crank pulley), 600+ HP, 11.6 sec 1/4th mi 122mph, 7.6sec 1/8th mi
  #34  
Old 03-02-2022 | 10:47 AM
ampiko's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AlexJag
Just for reference on the earlier zf on 4.2xkr The torque is over 500 with our tune And it's handling it just fine and taking quite a bit of abuse
Which ZF is it?
 
  #35  
Old 03-02-2022 | 10:45 PM
AlexJag's Avatar
Sponsor
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,260
Likes: 422
From: San Diego
Default

4.2 cars use zf 6hp26
 
__________________
2008 XKR Convertible, (mods: AlphaJagTuning ECU Tune , 1.5lb pulley, (200cel cats( are now melted), xpipe, Bosch 001 pump, 180 Thermostat.
Drag strip : 7.9sec 1/8mi 90 MPH . 1/4 mile 12.55 at 112.98mph
432rwh Dyno on Mustang Dynometer , Approx 511 crank HP.
2013 XJ 5.0 SC (Alpha Jag ECU, TCU tune, crank pulley), 600+ HP, 11.6 sec 1/4th mi 122mph, 7.6sec 1/8th mi
The following users liked this post:
dmchao (03-03-2022)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RussellxjLSC
XJ ( X351 )
14
03-11-2020 07:50 PM
AL NZ
XJ ( X351 )
5
09-09-2018 07:32 PM
AlexJag
XK / XKR ( X150 )
12
03-14-2018 10:01 PM
BostonKiller
XF and XFR ( X250 )
4
09-02-2015 02:18 AM
barryf43
XJ ( X351 )
15
03-07-2013 02:02 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: 5.0 SC Power Upgrade



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 AM.