XJ ( X351 ) 2009 - 2019

X351 XJ with the 2.0L Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-07-2014, 07:58 PM
Cambo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 8,638
Received 4,454 Likes on 2,426 Posts
Default X351 XJ with the 2.0L Turbo

I'm currently in Korea on business & have been chatting with the MD of our local company, he's up for a new car & has been thinking long & hard about the XJ...but I was more than surprised when he asked me "how is the 2.0L in the XJ?"

Yes, in Korea the XJ comes with the 2.0L turbo 4-cylinder as seen in the XF, the Freelander and the Evoque.

Jaguar Korea have 6 model XJ's in the lineup.

Luxury SWB - 2.0L Turbo, 240HP
Premium Luxury LWB - 3.0L V6 Diesel 275HP or 3.0L V6 S/C 340HP
Premium Luxury SWB - 3.0L V6 Diesel 275HP or 3.0L V6 S/C 340HP
Portfolio AWD LWB - 3.0L V6 S/C 340HP with AWD
XJR SWB - 5.0L S/C 550HP
SuperSport LWB - 5.0L S/C 510HP

I had a feeling that the 2.0L would show up in the XJ somewhere....there you go...
 
  #2  
Old 07-08-2014, 12:10 PM
XJsss's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Reynolds Lake Oconee, GA USA
Posts: 1,812
Received 516 Likes on 414 Posts
Default

If it was me I'd go for the Diesel.
 
  #3  
Old 07-09-2014, 10:53 AM
axr6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 2,367
Received 594 Likes on 422 Posts
Default

I had loaner XFs with the 2.0 Turbo and I did not like them. The turbo had substantial lag, the idle had the typical 4-cylinder roughness and it is simply not what I would expect from a Jaguar. I would NOT buy a Jaguar with this engine regardless of the price.
 
  #4  
Old 07-14-2014, 07:17 PM
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Mooresville, NC (Race City USA), home of most NASCAR teams.
Posts: 1,818
Received 481 Likes on 368 Posts
Default

I just had a flashback. I owned a 1987 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe with a 2.3 L I-4 engine and a 5 speed manual transmission which, totally stock, went from zero to 60 MPH in 7.5 seconds. Twenty-seven years latter the Jaguar X351 SWB with a 2.0 L I-4 turbo can go from zero to 60 MPH in 7.5 seconds. Doesn't seem like much progress in 27 years, does it? By the way, the '87 Turbo Coupe had four wheel anti-lock disc brakes, had automatic ride control, got 18/26 EPA MPG, had a highly aerodynamic sexy body, could go 133 MPH, and was very affordable. Why would I buy an expensive Jaguar today with a 2.0L I-4 engine that doesn't perform any better than an affordable Thunderbird I purchased 27 years ago?
 
  #5  
Old 07-14-2014, 07:29 PM
JgaXkr's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Boston Mass
Posts: 1,627
Received 263 Likes on 203 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by johndahlheimer
I just had a flashback. I owned a 1987 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe with a 2.3 L I-4 engine and a 5 speed manual transmission which, totally stock, went from zero to 60 MPH in 7.5 seconds. Twenty-seven years latter the Jaguar X351 SWB with a 2.0 L I-4 turbo can go from zero to 60 MPH in 7.5 seconds. Doesn't seem like much progress in 27 years, does it? By the way, the '87 Turbo Coupe had four wheel anti-lock disc brakes, had automatic ride control, got 18/26 EPA MPG, had a highly aerodynamic sexy body, could go 133 MPH, and was very affordable. Why would I buy an expensive Jaguar today with a 2.0L I-4 engine that doesn't perform any better than an affordable Thunderbird I purchased 27 years ago?
Unless you are planning to move to Korea its not an option.
 
  #6  
Old 07-14-2014, 08:02 PM
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Mooresville, NC (Race City USA), home of most NASCAR teams.
Posts: 1,818
Received 481 Likes on 368 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JgaXkr
Unless you are planning to move to Korea its not an option.
Just making a point; not intending to move to Korea. But I suspect the 2.0 L turbo I-4 may be introduced in the USA in the foreseeable future at the same price as the current 3.0 V-6, if Jaguar's engine downsizing continues. First you you can't get a 5.0 L V-8 anymore without coughing up an additional $10,000.00, then the 3.0 L V-6 will cost you $10,000.00 more than the 2.0 L I-4. We are in a world market, and Jaguar, owned by an Indian company, has positioned themselves with a 2.0 L I-4 engine to address Obama's mandated future fuel economy requirements in the good old USA. Suddenly Jaguar's '15 performance equals that of an '87 T-Bird, a 28 year retrogression.
 
  #7  
Old 07-15-2014, 09:44 AM
axr6's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 2,367
Received 594 Likes on 422 Posts
Default

Just dropped off my '12 XJL for its yearly free service and got an other XF 2.0 as a loaner. Just as I stated before, there is NO WAY that I would purchase an XF or an XJ with this 4-banger. It just reminded me how rough it was, and the occasional turbo lag that made me feel like the engine stalled for a couple of seconds. The V6 is definitely better but, neither of them comes close to the smoothness and the general feel of the 5.0. It is a shame that premier cars like these Jags are being forced to go with those lesser engines.

Now I am really glad that I purchased both the XJL and the XF in 2012 when the NA V8 was still available. If I were contemplating a purchase right now, I would rather get a used '12 than a new model with the smaller engines.
 
The following users liked this post:
Jffcurt (07-15-2014)
  #8  
Old 06-02-2024, 08:31 AM
QP7's Avatar
QP7
QP7 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 258
Received 35 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

I'm now also looking at a 2.0 litre... Has anyone driven one in a X351? Looks lovely and the SC in the 3.0 s beautifully smooth, no lag...
 
  #9  
Old 06-02-2024, 08:44 AM
Thermo's Avatar
Veteran member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Great Mills, MD
Posts: 14,379
Likes: 0
Received 3,887 Likes on 3,194 Posts
Default

QP7, stick with your 3.0L. Reading what others are saying, you are taking a fairly big step down. Yes, the seats and whatnot will still be there, but the motor is going to be underwelming.
 
  #10  
Old 06-02-2024, 03:50 PM
QP7's Avatar
QP7
QP7 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 258
Received 35 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Agreed - although it's not for me !!

Thank you, Thermo !!!

 
  #11  
Old 06-02-2024, 04:26 PM
User 42324's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 476
Received 108 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

It was introduced for countries with big taxation on bigger engines.
 
  #12  
Old 06-04-2024, 03:30 AM
QP7's Avatar
QP7
QP7 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2023
Posts: 258
Received 35 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Yes, and I'm not at all concerned about performance - merely reliability compared to the 3.0 and 5.0 and whether parts are still and /or readily available. e.g. coolant system.
 
  #13  
Old 06-04-2024, 09:04 AM
Vasara's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Finland, Helsinki
Posts: 594
Received 224 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

The inline 2.0 petrol is far most reliable engine available on x351 platform.
And still used widely on different Ford platforms, so parts are well available.

Edit: Performance wise with 240hp alumium body x351 are still ok. (there are lot of less powerfull vehicles on road)
 

Last edited by Vasara; 06-04-2024 at 09:09 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Obi
F-Type ( X152 )
49
11-26-2022 10:36 AM
zimt
XF (X260)
9
11-06-2022 03:23 PM
zimt
XF and XFR ( X250 )
7
11-06-2022 03:21 PM
zimt
UK & Eire
0
08-20-2022 07:55 AM
Cambo
Jaguar Engines & transmissions
1
03-09-2015 04:55 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: X351 XJ with the 2.0L Turbo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.