XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 ) 2003 - 2009

Bg44 k

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-15-2012 | 10:59 AM
Fairlane500's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 291
Likes: 10
From: New Brunswick Canada
Default Bg44 k

Which would be preferable? - To run a can of BG44 K through a tank of gas over 7 days of mixed city and highway driving, or to run it through on a 4 hour trip at 120 Kmph/ 75 Mph? Perhaps there's no difference, but I read on a post that using it over a longer period of time will allow it to do more good.

Opinions solicited

Thanks!
 
  #2  
Old 04-15-2012 | 01:36 PM
N9921x's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 168
Likes: 19
From: Colorado
Default

Longer gooder.

Chemical reaction time to do the work.

 
  #3  
Old 04-15-2012 | 03:30 PM
jahummer's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,280
Likes: 2,400
From: Florida
Default

With my limited knowledge, I would say both. Over time gives it a chance to sit and dissolve "gunk". Continuously run from beginning to end at once allows cleaning without fuel system starts and stops.

I am still curious how one solvent diluted with another solvent makes for a better solvent that does no damage, but that's another discussion.
 
  #4  
Old 04-15-2012 | 04:37 PM
Mikey's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,058
Likes: 2,266
From: Perth Ontario Canada
Default

My answer is 'neither'. Save your money. If your car is running poorly due to clogged injectors, get it fixed properly. If it's running normally, why do you need it? Pump gas has all the cleaning additives required for a healthy engine.
 
  #5  
Old 04-15-2012 | 05:10 PM
user 2029223's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,922
Likes: 256
Default

What do the product directions say?

Seriously, if the directions aren't specific enough, why not go to the mfg'r. web site and see if they address different ways to use their product ?
 
  #6  
Old 04-15-2012 | 06:47 PM
motorcarman's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 8,431
From: Wise County,TX
Default

Jaguar issued a TSB years ago for cleaning the injectors.

bob gauff
 
Attached Files
  #7  
Old 04-16-2012 | 09:24 AM
Brutal's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,254
Likes: 2,198
From: Damon /Houston, Texas
Default

Damn bob you comep with some old tsb's. How about a newer more relavant to this issue from jaguar that specifalyl recommended bg44k.
Jtb 00241. And no mikey gas additive are not enough to fix. And its not just a clogged injector, but bepodits on the tips esp. The direct injectors
 
  #8  
Old 04-16-2012 | 09:57 AM
N9921x's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 168
Likes: 19
From: Colorado
Default

Originally Posted by Brutal
Damn bob you comep with some old tsb's. How about a newer more relavant to this issue from jaguar that specifalyl recommended bg44k.
Jtb 00241. And no mikey gas additive are not enough to fix. And its not just a clogged injector, but bepodits on the tips esp. The direct injectors
Agree.
 
  #9  
Old 04-16-2012 | 10:37 AM
Mikey's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,058
Likes: 2,266
From: Perth Ontario Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Brutal
Damn bob you comep with some old tsb's. How about a newer more relavant to this issue from jaguar that specifalyl recommended bg44k.
Jtb 00241. And no mikey gas additive are not enough to fix. And its not just a clogged injector, but bepodits on the tips esp. The direct injectors
I'd like to see a full and complete copy of that TSB. Here's the summary:

Summary:

JAGUAR: ON SOME VEHICLES, THE ENGINE IS MALFUNCTIONING BY EXHIBITING HARD STARTING, POOR FUEL ECONOMY, MISFIRE, AND/OR A ROUGH IDLE CONDITION. FUEL CONTAMINATION OR POOR FUEL QUALITY LEADS TO CLOGGED FUEL INJECTORS AND RESTRICTING FUEL INJECTOR FLOW

Which addresses a vehicle with an existing problem specifically due to contamination or poor fuel quality. That's a different kettle of fish than adding something to the gas on cars suffering none of the stated problems.
 
  #10  
Old 04-16-2012 | 03:26 PM
SuperTrav's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 452
Likes: 31
From: Dallas
Default

I contend that there are deposits that will build up over time of which the standard cocktail of additives in today's fuels do not prevent from accumulating. I further posit that BG 44K, and almost NONE of the other additives in the marketplace, do a great job of removing some or even most of these accumulations, and present a good preventative option.

BG touts a bevy of test results and testimonials to support their claims of:
http://www.bgprod.com/blendr/magicPill.html
" ...recent independent tests have documented its ability to scrub corrosion from fuel sending units, remove choking substrate deposits from catalytic converters, and restore ignition efficiency."

Furthermore, I believe increasingly that BG's pressurized intake and fuel induction cleaning agents/procedures are an excellent preventative maintenance practice that can and will hold in abeyance the need for: fuel injector removal and cleaning or failure and replacement, throttle body failure and necessary rebuilding/replacement, etc.
 

Last edited by SuperTrav; 04-16-2012 at 03:34 PM.
  #11  
Old 04-16-2012 | 07:26 PM
Mikey's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,058
Likes: 2,266
From: Perth Ontario Canada
Default

Great theory- but where's the evidence to prove it? Probably not one in a 1000 owners uses any additives in the gas of any type. Blame it on being ignorant, cheap, or irresponsible, they just don't. If this neglect resulted in any operational problems we'd all know about via the media in agonizing detail and would tar and feather whatever brand of gas retailer that seemed to deserve it the most.

Reality? As stated above, I don't use them, don't know anybody that uses them and don't know of anybody that has a problem. Do a search on this board looking for people complaining about problems that were traced to clogged injectors.

As always- if there was a need and a benefit, why would the gas companies NOT take advantage of the huge marketing opportunities to put the miracle juice directly into the gas?

Speaking of marketing- are you surprised that the BG products website concluded that their own products works the best? What else would they say- it's cr*p and you're an idiot if you buy it?

Excuse the rant, this subject is one of my favorite hot buttons.
 
  #12  
Old 04-16-2012 | 08:32 PM
Norri's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 118,043
Likes: 6,392
From: PHX some of the time
Default

I got you this Mikey

 
  #13  
Old 04-16-2012 | 08:33 PM
u102768's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 1,491
From: New Zealand
Default

Originally Posted by Mikey
I'd like to see a full and complete copy of that TSB.
This copy does only seem to be specific to the 5L engine but here you go.
 
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
303-00 JTB00241.pdf (28.9 KB, 689 views)
  #14  
Old 04-16-2012 | 09:13 PM
Mikey's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,058
Likes: 2,266
From: Perth Ontario Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Norri
I got you this Mikey

Just for me? It's PERFECT! Hey- I can see my house from up here!


Originally Posted by u102768
This copy does only seem to be specific to the 5L engine but here you go.
Thanks. Again, it addresses an existing condition thought be caused by contamination or poor fuel quality. It attempts to fix the condition by cleaning them in-situ with specific tools and equipment. There's no connection between this and the proposed addition of the same fluid to the gas tank.

I do have some professional 'history' with this subject- gas turbine engines have fuel injection nozzles not much different than the latest generation of direct injected piston engines. After monitoring fuel nozzle durability, reliability and performance for a period of over 25 million flying hours on the assembled fleet of engines, NO additives were deemed effective in removing deposits when simply combined with the fuel. The fluid was just far too diluted to have any effect. In situ cleaning, similar to what Jaguar is proposing in the TSB, was only marginally more effective than doing nothing. The only effective method to get them clean was a pyrolyitic process that baked them at around 900*F similar to a self cleaning oven. This was done in conjunction with other scheduled work 'whether they needed it or not' despite a mound of evidence indicating that performance was unaffected.

I better stop now or Norri will take my new soapbox away
 
  #15  
Old 04-16-2012 | 10:43 PM
motorcarman's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 8,431
From: Wise County,TX
Default

Originally Posted by Brutal
Damn bob you comep with some old tsb's. How about a newer more relavant to this issue from jaguar that specifalyl recommended bg44k.
Jtb 00241. And no mikey gas additive are not enough to fix. And its not just a clogged injector, but bepodits on the tips esp. The direct injectors

Brutal
I lost my username/password in 2006 when I left the dealer so I don't have any newer TSBs.

Same problems with newer fixes???????????????????

bob gauff
 
  #16  
Old 04-17-2012 | 01:02 AM
u102768's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 1,491
From: New Zealand
Default

Originally Posted by Mikey
There's no connection between this and the proposed addition of the same fluid to the gas tank.
FWIW, there was also Special Service Message 47638 released in April last year titled "5.0 Gasoline Fuel Additive - Clogged Fuel Injectors" that said:

Jaguar engineering now approve the use of BG 44K Power Enhancer Cleaner (which is sold in an 11oz/325ml can or bottle).

Further information on the additive can be found on the BG Products website BG Company

Please follow all instructions on the product labeling prior to use.

Please clear all stored diagnostic trouble codes prior toreleasing the vehicle.

NOTE: Jaguar recommends only using the above products a maximum of twice every 15,000 miles or 24,000km’s.
 
  #17  
Old 04-17-2012 | 01:14 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 24,979
Likes: 11,023
From: Pacific Northwest USA
Default

BG Products work. I was a non-believer myself, at one time.

Still, though, I think removing injectors for professional cleaning is best.

Cheers
DD
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flstfi
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
11
01-15-2013 07:44 PM
LRL
XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 )
6
12-20-2012 08:48 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:57 PM.