XJ XJ6 / XJ8 / XJR ( X350 & X358 ) 2003 - 2009

Regular gas?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 10-09-2011 | 06:47 PM
Adam78's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 165
Likes: 12
From: Brick, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by bmw745ion19s
sorry if mine or anyone elses comments seemed to be kinda harsh at first, we are genuinely glad you showed up to actually ask and learn then to just assume and have 1 more XJ treated bad lol

i fell bad for all the bruised horses out there though.
lol i take no offence. I am on a few classic camaro forums and see a lot of almost obvious questions get asked time and time again. And i am in love with this car, i only want to treat her right!
 
  #22  
Old 10-09-2011 | 09:35 PM
vserduchka's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 16
Likes: 1
From: Palm Beach, FL
Default

Is there any additive available to bring 93 octane up to 95?
 
  #23  
Old 10-10-2011 | 12:03 AM
Mikey's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,058
Likes: 2,266
From: Perth Ontario Canada
Default

What vehicle do you need 95 for?
 
  #24  
Old 10-10-2011 | 09:06 AM
Chuck08XJR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 193
Likes: 14
From: Houston
Default

If gas mileage is a major issue then maybe not the right type of car. IMHO
 
The following users liked this post:
stoffer (10-10-2011)
  #25  
Old 10-10-2011 | 09:14 AM
jahummer's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,280
Likes: 2,400
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by rick1965

If premium cost 15 cents more per gallon and they are an ave driver and use 1 tank a week. then they are spending all 3 dollar more per week on a luxery or performance are for gas. I am sure everyone waste more than that a week.
Not that I mind spending more for premium and not that it is like this everywhere, but the difference in price around here is a heck of a lot more than 15 cents. Just last night I went to a Shell station, 87 was 3.249, 89 was 3.499 & 93 was 3.749. That's more like $12.50 per tank fill up...
 
  #26  
Old 10-10-2011 | 10:05 AM
Chuck08XJR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 193
Likes: 14
From: Houston
Default

Just buy premium and enjoy
 
  #27  
Old 10-10-2011 | 12:34 PM
stoffer's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 41
Likes: 2
From: outside of TX for the moment
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
OK, I'll bite :-)

Which parts wear out faster if a lower octane fuel is used ?

Cheers
DD

detonation can take out a piston...
 
  #28  
Old 10-10-2011 | 12:40 PM
Mikey's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,058
Likes: 2,266
From: Perth Ontario Canada
Default

The cars have knock sensors that retard the ignition so that detonation does not occur. The result is less power and increased fuel consumption, but only while the knock sensor is actually doing something, most likely less than 5% of driving.
 
  #29  
Old 10-10-2011 | 12:44 PM
stoffer's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 41
Likes: 2
From: outside of TX for the moment
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck08XJR
If gas mileage is a major issue then maybe not the right type of car. IMHO

 
  #30  
Old 10-10-2011 | 01:41 PM
Chuck08XJR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 193
Likes: 14
From: Houston
The following users liked this post:
stoffer (10-10-2011)
  #31  
Old 10-10-2011 | 02:40 PM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 24,976
Likes: 11,021
From: Pacific Northwest USA
Default

Originally Posted by stoffer
detonation can take out a piston...

That's engine damage, not "wear out" . There's a difference :-)

Cheers
DD
 
  #32  
Old 10-10-2011 | 02:56 PM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 24,976
Likes: 11,021
From: Pacific Northwest USA
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck08XJR
Just buy premium and enjoy

That's what I do.

However, buying premium because we enjoy buying premium does not magically make true the myths and misunderstanding about high octane fuel :-)

Cheers
DD
 
  #33  
Old 10-10-2011 | 02:59 PM
stoffer's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 41
Likes: 2
From: outside of TX for the moment
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
That's engine damage, not "wear out" . There's a difference :-)

Cheers
DD

you'd be suprised what people this is "worn out" VS "damaged"
 
  #34  
Old 10-10-2011 | 03:10 PM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 24,976
Likes: 11,021
From: Pacific Northwest USA
Default

Originally Posted by Chuck08XJR
If gas mileage is a major issue then maybe not the right type of car. IMHO


Yeah, probably true....but I've gone back and read all the postings and can't find anyone who says it's a "major issue" for them.


Cheers
DD
 
  #35  
Old 10-10-2011 | 03:38 PM
Chuck08XJR's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 193
Likes: 14
From: Houston
Default

Was not intended for anyone here was a basic opinion
 
  #36  
Old 10-10-2011 | 04:15 PM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 24,976
Likes: 11,021
From: Pacific Northwest USA
Default

Originally Posted by stoffer
you'd be suprised what people this is "worn out" VS "damaged"

I think I get the gist of what you're trying to say.

I agree that some people interpret things differently. Most people, though, would not hold a burned, melted piston in their hand and say "See, the darn thing just wore out" :-)

My question stems from a couple people remarking that increased wear and tear would result from the use of a lower octane fuel. I'm just asking for examples so we can discuss them :-)

Cheers
DD
 
  #37  
Old 10-10-2011 | 05:04 PM
Fraser Mitchell's Avatar
Veteran Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,434
Likes: 2,468
From: Crewe, England
Default

Here in the UK we can buy 95 or 97 octane. I believe the standard is different to the USA. Here it is called RON (Research Octane Number). What is the US standard, and the numbers equivalent to ours ?

FWIW the UK "Super" is about 6-8 pence a litre more than "Regular". I filled up with it once by mistake, (from nearly empty right up to full). It seems to give slightly better fuel consumption, but not enough to offset the extra price.
 
  #38  
Old 10-10-2011 | 05:30 PM
Mikey's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 11,058
Likes: 2,266
From: Perth Ontario Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Fraser Mitchell
Here in the UK we can buy 95 or 97 octane. I believe the standard is different to the USA. Here it is called RON (Research Octane Number). What is the US standard, and the numbers equivalent to ours ?
See post #11 above.
 
  #39  
Old 10-10-2011 | 10:59 PM
xjrguy's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 973
From: Indianapolis, IN
Default

Originally Posted by bmw745ion19s
sorry if mine or anyone elses comments seemed to be kinda harsh at first, we are genuinely glad you showed up to actually ask and learn then to just assume and have 1 more XJ treated bad lol

i fell bad for all the bruised horses out there though.
I don't think you have too much to apologize for, BMW. I pretty much will back you up on all your comments.......well, actually I may have to take exception to the premature part wear thing; I might be able to give you some spark plug wear, but that's about it.

If they designed it for premium.......feed it premium, that's my take. In the big picture, the cost difference is insignificant.

Likewise, kudos to the OP for having the courage to ask.

Cheers,
 
  #40  
Old 10-22-2011 | 12:14 PM
Glendoramike's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 273
Likes: 75
From: California
Default

If your ride has computer controls, then the computer makes adjustments to make up for this. With variable cam timing, the intake valve closing is retarded to make your dynamic compression ratio drop down to around 8 to 1.

Knock can also come from pre-ignition which isn't controled by the spark timing.

Remember, your computer will be trying to advance the cam timing for more low end power and then the knock sensors will cause it to retard the timing. This will go back and forth and it isn't so swell for the motor.

 


Quick Reply: Regular gas?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM.