XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 ) 1995-1997

X300 Long term fuel trim mysteries

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 06-24-2013, 12:03 PM
RJ237's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Douglasville Ga.
Posts: 8,699
Received 2,819 Likes on 2,246 Posts
Default

Mine is still showing +55 or so, but the mileage is good and it runs well, so I just ignore it.
 
  #22  
Old 07-26-2013, 07:25 PM
jeremiahjaguar's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Los Angeles, Ca.
Posts: 307
Received 56 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Sorry its been some time but i would like to give you the update. Long story short my indy jag mechanic/shop doesnt have the software to make the adaptions. Although he does remember doing such adaptions back in 95 when he worked at the local jag dealer. I cant find anyone local that has the ability to reset Both the Fuel Mass Flow Rate (FMFR) and the Air Mass Flow Rate. this makes me crazy
 
  #23  
Old 11-08-2013, 01:17 PM
EZDriver's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Holly Lake Ranch, Texas
Posts: 2,125
Received 278 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RJ237
My LTFT has now gone from 53.9 to -100 on both banks measured by the Ultrgauge.
Next week I'm going to get the Autoenginuity out, because that doesn't make sense.
Hi RJ,

Still concerned about stalling. But it happens so seldom now I haven't worked the problem much lately. Yesterday I decided to get the Ultraguage out and monitor fuel trims. Following that I did a search and found your results which I am responding to. What I found was The short term trims were plus and minus around zero which I think is normal. But the Long term started out at +57.81. After I drove for a while the Long term had jumped to -99.1. After a stop of a few hours the Lt went back to around 58. I would change now and then a couple of tenths. Now all this is on both banks. I really don't understand the -99, but then again I really don't understand exactly how the fuel trims are supposed to work. During all my driving yesterday the car ran great. No stall at all which it doesn't do very often anyway.

My reason for starting to monitor the fuel trims is to see if there is a glitch when a stall happens. I believe the stall that I have is due to a very short term fuel interuption. Maybe the fuel trims will tell me that.

Just thought I'd bring you up to date on what I have been doing.

Bob
 
  #24  
Old 11-08-2013, 02:24 PM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,915
Received 10,973 Likes on 7,209 Posts
Default

Purely "FWIW"....

I've convinced myself to simply ignore LTFT readings on my '95 XJR. First, there's some question as to whether or not the typical scan tools are translating data correctly on these early OBDII cars. Next, the '95 OBDII system was apparently not fully developed to begin with. Third, I'm not sure that any of the readings will make sense or be trustworthy without first a full recalibration using the Jaguar WDS (or equivalent) equipment.

If the STFTs look good, I'm happy, happy, happy (apologies to Phil Robertson)

Under the best of circumstances it can sometimes be difficult to get your head around cause-and-effect with OBD systems. When the system is known for anomalies, though, it gets even more difficult.

Cheers
DD
 
  #25  
Old 11-08-2013, 02:54 PM
RJ237's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Douglasville Ga.
Posts: 8,699
Received 2,819 Likes on 2,246 Posts
Default

I think we have consensus. Many months ago I took my car to visit sparkenzap. He put it on his wds and even that didn't seem to interface very well. My car runs great, mileage is good, but as good as the XK8, and STFT reasonable with the Ultragauge.
 
  #26  
Old 11-09-2013, 05:49 PM
EZDriver's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Holly Lake Ranch, Texas
Posts: 2,125
Received 278 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RJ237
I think we have consensus. Many months ago I took my car to visit sparkenzap. He put it on his wds and even that didn't seem to interface very well. My car runs great, mileage is good, but as good as the XK8, and STFT reasonable with the Ultragauge.
Hey guys, I think I figured it out. I remember when I first got my scan tool I couldn't figure out why the mileage numbers were so far off. Finally observed that the mileage numbers were off by a factor of 100. The 100 error is probably in the fuel flow measurement and calculation. And, I think that 100 factor error carries over into the long term trim numbers. If you move the decimal two places to the left you get numbers that look pretty good and reasoneable.

What do you think?
 
  #27  
Old 11-09-2013, 06:01 PM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,915
Received 10,973 Likes on 7,209 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EZDriver
Hey guys, I think I figured it out. I remember when I first got my scan tool I couldn't figure out why the mileage numbers were so far off. Finally observed that the mileage numbers were off by a factor of 100. The 100 error is probably in the fuel flow measurement and calculation. And, I think that 100 factor error carries over into the long term trim numbers. If you move the decimal two places to the left you get numbers that look pretty good and reasoneable.


I'm not clear on what "mileage numbers" are with respect to scan tool readings.

Are you talking about the trip computer readings? I think those are a calculation based on injector pulse width.

LTFT is a measurement of fueling corrections over a long term.

Not sayin' you're wrong. Just sayin' I don't get the connection.



What do you think?


At minimum.....If you're happy, I'm happy


Cheers
DD
 
  #28  
Old 11-15-2013, 11:43 AM
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,114
Received 973 Likes on 644 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by EZDriver
Hey guys, I think I figured it out. I remember when I first got my scan tool I couldn't figure out why the mileage numbers were so far off. Finally observed that the mileage numbers were off by a factor of 100. The 100 error is probably in the fuel flow measurement and calculation. And, I think that 100 factor error carries over into the long term trim numbers. If you move the decimal two places to the left you get numbers that look pretty good and reasoneable.

What do you think?
Your first sentence is absolutely true. You 'think' you figured it out. I've thought that a few times over the years regarding the AJ16 engines we have. Doug has, too. But we always find something 10 minutes later that blows up our theory.
Doug and I have conversed in a number of threads on this matter, but I'm in a unique position as I have all the original equipment Jag put out to work on 'em close at hand. [when I can cajole it into working, which is a challenge sometimes]

A comment was made that maybe the fuel trims aren't that valuable when dealing with the AJ16. That's basically accurate. The comment about the MAF PID seemingly being two decimals off; also accurate.

Anyway, I think I have enough stuff collected to maybe help explain the inexplicable operation of the system. With all that's going on and the weekend coming up, it will take me a few days, but I'll get something posted here that might help.

In the meantime, elsewhere on the Forum there are a couple of papers I wrote on fuel trims. Search 'fuel trim primer +quiz' and they will turn up. Go through them and you will get some idea how trims work. But bear in mind, the early systems in the AJ16 are much more rudimentary than any later car.

Cheers,
 
The following 3 users liked this post by xjrguy:
EZDriver (11-16-2013), MountainMan (09-30-2014), RJ237 (11-15-2013)
  #29  
Old 11-17-2013, 12:57 PM
jeremiahjaguar's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Los Angeles, Ca.
Posts: 307
Received 56 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

I too have dismissed long term fuel trims and the Maf as not important as long as short term fuel trims read normal, figured thats just they way things are. Now, I monitored intake air temps and fuel trims because I was going go place a larger lower pulley for my supercharger, my short term go lean the faster I go, bouncing back and forth from 1 thru 13. I decided to replace the maf with a used one I had and short term fuel trims now remain -1 thru -15, now I have plenty of fuel. I cant wrap my mind around the fact my long terms fuel trims remain wacky and dont make sense. but evidently the maf must be good for something because I now have stft that I can live with. BTW I thought the spare used MAF I had was no good because something sounds loose inside it but it works better than the new after market one. Any thoughts?"
 
  #30  
Old 09-27-2014, 11:24 AM
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,114
Received 973 Likes on 644 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
Purely "FWIW"....

I've convinced myself to simply ignore LTFT readings on my '95 XJR. First, there's some question as to whether or not the typical scan tools are translating data correctly on these early OBDII cars. Next, the '95 OBDII system was apparently not fully developed to begin with. Third, I'm not sure that any of the readings will make sense or be trustworthy without first a full recalibration using the Jaguar WDS (or equivalent) equipment.

If the STFTs look good, I'm happy, happy, happy (apologies to Phil Robertson)

Under the best of circumstances it can sometimes be difficult to get your head around cause-and-effect with OBD systems. When the system is known for anomalies, though, it gets even more difficult.

Cheers
DD
Doug,

Hey Buddy, I finally got some of this fuel trim stuff pinned down. Ended up posting in this thread here. I still didn't get all of what I wanted, because I'm currently without our PDU. Sorry.

I hope it helps you a bit in understanding your '95.

https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...rs-etc-126997/

Cheers,
 

Last edited by xjrguy; 09-27-2014 at 11:36 AM.
  #31  
Old 09-27-2014, 11:52 AM
Doug's Avatar
Veteran Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,915
Received 10,973 Likes on 7,209 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xjrguy
I hope it helps you a bit in understanding your '95.

https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/x...rs-etc-126997/

Ahhh, good info, many thanks. It'll take me a bit to absorb it all, though


Cheers
DD
 
  #32  
Old 10-04-2014, 09:53 AM
Vee's Avatar
Vee
Vee is offline
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 4,948
Received 1,579 Likes on 1,227 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug
Contacted dealer and set things up for Friday but my schedule changed.

Might be just as well as the dealer wants about $400 to recalibrate the TPS, reorient the O2 sensors, and pull/clear the air bag code. More than I wanted to spend right now, to be honest.

I might see what I can do on my own regarding the air bag light and continuing living with the LTFT as I have been for the last few years!

Cheers
DD
Man, that stinks! Recalibrating the TPS and reorienting the O2 sensors and shutting off the ABS light is probably less than 1 hours worth if time with the dealer computer!

I understand they have to make money, but $400?!?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wolfy
XJ ( X351 )
58
05-28-2024 08:06 AM
aholbro1
XJ XJ6 / XJR6 ( X300 )
17
08-05-2021 05:02 AM
dsnyder586
XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 )
55
04-04-2019 02:38 PM
OkieTim
S-Type / S type R Supercharged V8 ( X200 )
3
09-08-2015 04:48 PM
OkieTim
Jaguar Forums Feedback & Suggestion Center
2
09-02-2015 12:48 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
 


Quick Reply: X300 Long term fuel trim mysteries



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 PM.