XJR typical driveline loss? (Automatic Transmission)
#1
![Question](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/icons/icon5.gif)
Didn't find this in a quick search, but has anyone determined the typical "driveline loss" % for the X300 XJR?
In other words, if the engine makes 322HP, what is the typical rear wheel dyno HP stock, and the resulting % delta?
Just curious.
.
In other words, if the engine makes 322HP, what is the typical rear wheel dyno HP stock, and the resulting % delta?
Just curious.
.
#2
#3
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, answering my own question ![Smile](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Here are some interesting data points:
Welcome to Jag-lovers - Members Photo Viewing Page
Welcome to Jag-lovers - Members Photo Viewing Page
1996 XJR
Before "andybracket"
~263PS (~259HP) measured rear wheel
~471NM (~347ftlb)
After "andybracket"
279.6PS (~276HP) measured rear wheel
483.1NM (~359ftlb)
Welcome to Jag-lovers - Members Photo Viewing Page
1996 XJR
Max RWHP 257.6 or 242HP , not sure
336ftlb reported as max it appears.
Welcome to Jag-lovers - Members Photo Viewing Page
1997 XJ6
192.42hp
224.47ftlb
So, some simple math for the HP side for the XJR:
X300 XJR rated HP is 322HP, producing ~258 rear wheel HP is a 20% loss.
X300 NA rated HP is 245HP, producing ~192 rear wheep HP is also close enough to 20%.
That seems very typical.
![Smile](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Here are some interesting data points:
Welcome to Jag-lovers - Members Photo Viewing Page
Welcome to Jag-lovers - Members Photo Viewing Page
1996 XJR
Before "andybracket"
~263PS (~259HP) measured rear wheel
~471NM (~347ftlb)
After "andybracket"
279.6PS (~276HP) measured rear wheel
483.1NM (~359ftlb)
Welcome to Jag-lovers - Members Photo Viewing Page
1996 XJR
Max RWHP 257.6 or 242HP , not sure
336ftlb reported as max it appears.
Welcome to Jag-lovers - Members Photo Viewing Page
1997 XJ6
192.42hp
224.47ftlb
So, some simple math for the HP side for the XJR:
X300 XJR rated HP is 322HP, producing ~258 rear wheel HP is a 20% loss.
X300 NA rated HP is 245HP, producing ~192 rear wheep HP is also close enough to 20%.
That seems very typical.
The following users liked this post:
swaschka (07-11-2014)
#4
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 24,894
Received 10,952 Likes
on
7,196 Posts
The following users liked this post:
al_roethlisberger (07-10-2014)
#5
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, 20% is not too bad really in my opinion. I was pleasantly surprised.
I'd rather have the "bulletproof" 4L80E than a lot of alternatives. Plus being a descendent of the TH400, there are a lot of parts and knowledge after several decades of existence
![Smile](https://www.jaguarforums.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
99xk8guy
XK8 / XKR ( X100 )
11
06-05-2023 06:28 AM
FS[Western US]: FREE- 99 XJR ECM and TCM
XJsc-guy
PRIVATE For Sale / Trade or Buy Classifieds
6
09-25-2015 11:09 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)