XJ XJ8 / XJR ( X308 ) 1997 - 2003

+*+*+Project Crusher by Buckhead Imports Performance, XJR with 2.9 Whipple 700HP+*+*+

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #101  
Old 10-24-2012, 09:28 PM
adam699's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 824
Received 84 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thundercat
@ sean, being carefull in the break in process. after they will pull the heads and retorque.

@adam, there is a box under the supercharger that 2 pipes come out of and run to the boost coolers on each side.
Show us more pics. I'm glad that this project is finally showing more momentum.

What rear end did you end up going with? I recall you said 3.55s. Did you get the TCM reprogrammed?
 
  #102  
Old 10-24-2012, 11:33 PM
Baloo's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 57
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SteveM
Ummm, you need to click on it. It is a video, albeit fuzzy.
Ha ha, you got me there, I was being stupid
 
  #103  
Old 10-24-2012, 11:38 PM
XJR Prototype's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Grove City, Ohio
Posts: 366
Received 33 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sean B
To BMW M cars the machining is for 'dyno ready' results, the 6 cylinder cast iron block is a known quantity, these AJ's aren't...

This guy lives high power builds - I learnt to check things with my machine shop from this series. 1000bhp is no joke from 3.2litres...
Secrets Behind The HPF 1000 RWHP Daily Driven BMW M3 Race Engines Part Two - YouTube

I've known about all that for years from the turbo world, I have a built eclipse too

I know that you can't really take what works for other platforms and apply it to another, but most boosted cars share the same basic building techniques like the video you posted, as what they do is the same in the turbo 4 banger world.

I am however, clueless on this v8 platforms ability to take power and certain tricks that could be useful in helping it hold together... but I just don't see why pulling the heads is necessarily a given if everything is done correctly the first time.

Until I'm lifting them under load they are staying put
 
  #104  
Old 11-05-2012, 11:20 PM
sparkenzap's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: atlanta ga
Posts: 4,502
Received 1,064 Likes on 867 Posts
Default

Who says that sound was even Thundercat's car? Heck, the planet might run out of petrol before the car runs again.
 

Last edited by sparkenzap; 11-05-2012 at 11:25 PM.
  #105  
Old 11-06-2012, 12:19 AM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,616
Received 1,068 Likes on 761 Posts
Default

Just re-torqueing will take some time as you need to remove the cams, pulling the heads even more, and from history, time is not what they seem to have.

Then some good time is needed to make everything work together electronically wise, it’s one thing to have the engine started, it’s another to having all tuned right, so I wouldn’t be surprised if it stays quiet here until next year before some dynos will pop up, but who knows.
 
  #106  
Old 11-06-2012, 12:21 AM
adam699's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 824
Received 84 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Plus he has to wait for christmass for the rest of the parts....
 
  #107  
Old 11-06-2012, 01:40 PM
Thundercat's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 259
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Going back together today. should be on the road by Friday. No more parts needed. pulling the cams sounds like a HUGE pain in the As*!
 
  #108  
Old 11-06-2012, 04:56 PM
sparkenzap's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: atlanta ga
Posts: 4,502
Received 1,064 Likes on 867 Posts
Default

So, some video will be shot, proving us doubters wrong, right? This Friday, right?
 
  #109  
Old 11-06-2012, 05:05 PM
XJR Prototype's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Grove City, Ohio
Posts: 366
Received 33 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

It's not nice to keep the car **** all to yourself... SHARE
 
  #110  
Old 11-06-2012, 11:52 PM
Baloo's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 57
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sparkenzap
So, some video will be shot, proving us doubters wrong, right? This Friday, right?
He did not say THIS friday. He meant next February 29th. 2022. See I've cracked the code.
 
  #111  
Old 11-07-2012, 02:59 AM
adam699's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 824
Received 84 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

I think the Mayans did their calendar waiting for this car.
 
The following users liked this post:
Rlover (11-07-2012)
  #112  
Old 11-07-2012, 09:40 PM
WaterDragon's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Gatos, CA
Posts: 1,761
Received 279 Likes on 194 Posts
Default

Thundercat will still have the last laugh when his car is on the road in 2012, and then even more so on the track which I predict will be early 2013.

and the Mayan calendar was to end in 2013, not begin.

That being said, I would be shocked to see a video of that car on the road this friday.
 

Last edited by WaterDragon; 11-07-2012 at 09:42 PM.
  #113  
Old 11-08-2012, 07:35 PM
adam699's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 824
Received 84 Likes on 71 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WaterDragon
Thundercat will still have the last laugh when his car is on the road in 2012, and then even more so on the track which I predict will be early 2013.

and the Mayan calendar was to end in 2013, not begin.

That being said, I would be shocked to see a video of that car on the road this friday.
I know. They've been waiting for this car to be completed way longer than this forum....
 
  #114  
Old 11-12-2012, 12:00 PM
sparkenzap's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: atlanta ga
Posts: 4,502
Received 1,064 Likes on 867 Posts
Default

Being a procrastinator myself, I can surely understand this project taking a long time. But, all of the original hype makes this lack of outcome pretty funny.
 
  #115  
Old 11-12-2012, 01:41 PM
avos's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,616
Received 1,068 Likes on 761 Posts
Default

Had to look up that word (some pun intended)

 
  #116  
Old 11-13-2012, 09:20 AM
Thundercat's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 259
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Car exploded.
 
  #117  
Old 11-13-2012, 11:28 AM
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PHX some of the time
Posts: 117,691
Received 6,339 Likes on 5,524 Posts
Default



Any more details?
 
  #118  
Old 11-13-2012, 02:57 PM
Sean B's Avatar
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sunny Southport UK
Posts: 4,791
Received 1,370 Likes on 1,077 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thundercat
Car exploded.
stop it! lets see it out and about lad
 
  #119  
Old 11-13-2012, 04:59 PM
peterlonz's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 16
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have just spent some time reading this thread & frankly I am disappointed.
I can't imagine any serious owner considering even considering allowing BIP to undertake vehicle performance mods.
I can't even see from the profile who BIP is, & I don't know what a "Whipple 2.9" is.

Performance improvements are generally broadly classed as mild, extended or extreme & I assume this poster can offer all.
Extreme will usually include brake, suspension & transmission mods as well as engine output & a "good job" will result in a driveable & reliable vehicle where all handling & braking issues are matched to the power plant.
700 bph is 167 hp per litre for a 4.2 jag engine, so I guess the original engine was of higher capacity. Whatever it started as the hp per litre looks too high for a road car.
If posters equiped to do such mods introduce themselves here they need to take the forum members more seriously.
 
  #120  
Old 11-13-2012, 06:10 PM
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Damon /Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,254
Received 2,193 Likes on 1,359 Posts
Default

Google it peter if you dont know what a whipple is and 700hp too much. Please. I have a 87 suburban with a fuel injected 383 and nitrous thats 700hp and its a tow vehicle. And currently rebuilding the 4litrev6 engine in my 05 nissan frontier(navara) and going to a much larger blower from ken bell
(2.6) size in litres. And looking to up the output to the rear wheels from 330 to 400+ and this is in a 4x4 5500# truck i drive daily and offroad and rock crawl with....bip has stuff out there and other cars theyve done to. But you cant get anything done if youre online allday either aas i know sometimes tooo well
 


Quick Reply: +*+*+Project Crusher by Buckhead Imports Performance, XJR with 2.9 Whipple 700HP+*+*+



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.